X. Chen et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 2684–2688
2687
Wezenberg, S. J.; Kleij, A. W. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2713–2723; (d)
Melendez, J.; North, M.; Villuendas, P. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2577–2579; (e)
Clegg, W.; Harrington, R. W.; North, M.; Pasquale, R. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16,
6828–6843.
Table 2 (continued)
Entry Substrate
Product
Time Conversionb Selectivityb
(h)
(%)
(%)
4. (a) Dharman, M. M.; Yu, J. I.; Ahn, J. Y.; Park, D. W. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1754–
1757; (b) North, M.; Pasquale, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2946–2948.
5. (a) Sun, J.; Wang, J. Q.; Cheng, W. G.; Zhang, J. X.; Li, X. H.; Zhang, S. J.; She, Y. B.
Green Chem. 2012, 14, 654–660; (b) Sun, J.; Han, L. J.; Cheng, W. G.; Wang, J. Q.;
Zhang, X. P.; Zhang, S. J. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 502–507; (c) Sun, J.; Zhang, S. J.;
Cheng, W. G.; Ren, J. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3588–3591; (d) Sun, J.;
Cheng, W. G.; Fan, W.; Wang, Y. H.; Meng, Z. Y.; Zhang, S. J. Catal. Today 2009,
148, 361–367.
6. (a) Dai, W. L.; Yin, S. F.; Guo, R.; Luo, S. L.; Du, X.; Au, C. T. Catal. Lett. 2010, 136,
35–44; (b) Kleist, W.; Jutz, F.; Maciejewski, M.; Baiker, A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
2009, 3552–3561; (c) Shi, F.; Zhang, Q. H.; Ma, Y. B.; He, Y. D.; Deng, Y. Q. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4182–4183; (d) Qi, C. R.; Ye, J. W.; Zeng, W.; Jiang, H. F.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1925–1933; (e) Yang, Z. Z.; He, L. N.; Miao, C. X.;
Chanfreau, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2233–2240.
7. (a) Han, L.; Choi, H. J.; Choi, S. J.; Liu, B. Y.; Park, D. W. Green Chem. 2011, 13,
1023–1028; (b) Takahashi, T.; Watahiki, T.; Kitazume, S.; Yasuda, H.; Sakakura,
T. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1664–1666; (c) Xie, Y.; Ding, K. L.; Liu, Z. M.; Li, J. J.; An,
G. M.; Tao, R. T.; Sun, Z. Y.; Yang, Z. Z. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6687–6692; (d) Xie,
Y.; Zhang, Z. F.; Jiang, T.; He, J. L.; Han, B. X.; Wu, T. B.; Ding, K. L. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7255–7258.
8. (a) Liang, S. G.; Liu, H. Z.; Jiang, T.; Song, J. L.; Yang, G. Y.; Han, B. X. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 47, 2131–2133; (b) Song, J. L.; Zhang, Z. F.; Han, B. X.; Hu, S. Q.;
Li, W. J.; Xie, Y. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 1337–1341; (c) Wang, J. Q.; Yue, X. D.;
Cai, F.; He, L. N. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 167–172.
O
O
N
N
O
O
7d
0.5 99
97e
Ph
Ph
Ph
1g
2g
N
N
8d
2
99
98f
Ph
1h
2h
a
Reaction conditions: epoxides (0.1 mol), catalyst (2.0 mmol), 110 °C, CO2
2.0 MPa.
b
Determined by GC.
Reaction temperature: 120 °C.
Reaction temperature: 50 °C.
c
d
e
f
The byproduct was 3-ethyl-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one, determined by GC–MS.
The byproduct was 3-isopropyl-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one, determined by GC–
9. Parvulescu, V. I.; Hardacre, C. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2615–2665.
10. (a) Nunge, R. J.; Gill, W. N. AIChE J. 1963, 4, 469–474; (b) Yuan, X. L.; Zhang, S. J.;
Liu, J.; Lu, X. M. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2007, 257, 195–200.
MS.
11. (a) Altava, B.; Burguete, M. I.; Garcia-Verdugo, E.; Karbass, N.; Luis, S. V.;
Puzary, A.; Sans, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2311–2314; (b) Reviriego, F.;
Navarro, P.; Aran, V. J.; Jimeno, M. L.; Garcia-Espana, E.; Latorre, J.; Yunta, M. J.
R. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 8223–8231.
12. (a) Sun, J.; Perfetti, M. T.; Santos, W. L. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 3571–3575; (b)
Klis, T.; Serwatowski, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5223–5225; (c) Reilly, M. K.;
Rychnovsky, S. D. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4892–4895; (d) Fandrick, D. R.; Fandrick,
K. R.; Reeves, J. T.; Tan, Z. L.; Johnson, C. S.; Lee, H.; Song, J. H. J.; Yee, N. K.;
Senanayake, C. H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 88–91.
13. Shirae, Y.; Mino, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Fujita, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 5877–5879.
14. Cho, H. J.; Lee, S. M.; Jung, S.; Lee, T. K.; Yoon, H. J.; Lee, Y. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2011, 52, 1459–1461.
epoxides were the preferred substrates for the reaction and these
reactions could be completed in less than 6 h. While 1f, which
needs 24 h to reach 87% yield due to the higher hindrance origi-
nated from the two rings. The selectivity of all the reactions to
the cyclic carbonates was more than 99%. The catalyst also showed
excellent activity to the reactions of 1g, 1h aziridines and CO2 to
produce 5-aryl-2-oxazolidinones. The reactions could be processed
at mild conditions to achieve high conversion and regioselectivity.
In conclusion, a series of PS-bound diethanolamine based ionic
liquids were developed and used for the synthesis of cyclic carbon-
ates under mild conditions without any co-catalyst and any co-sol-
vents. Catalysts with different number of hydroxyl groups in the
cation of the IL had a remarkable influence on the reaction. Among
all the supported IL catalysts investigated, PS-DHEEAB was the
most effective. The catalyst could be applicable to a series of termi-
nal epoxides and aziridines with good activities. Moreover, the cat-
alyst could be recycled for six times without significant loss in
activity and selectivity. The result of this work is an example of
the application of diethanolamine based ILs as environmentally be-
nign alternatives in organic synthesis and catalysis.
15. Typical synthesis procedure of hydroxyl-functionalized ionic liquids: (a) For the
synthesis of PS-DHEEAB,
a mixture of PS (10.0 g, 53.4 mmol, 18.05% Cl
content), diethanolamine (5.6 g, 53.5 mmol) and acetonitrile (50 mL) was
heated at 80 °C for 24 h in a 125 mL three-necked flask with vigorous stirring.
After cooled down to room temperature, the solid residue was collected by
filtration and washed separately with water and acetone. Then, the solid was
dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 12 h and PS-DHEA was obtained. The loading
of diethanolamine attached on the PS was 3.7 mmol/g determined by nitrogen
content from elementary analysis (Vario EL, Elementar Analysensysteme
GmbH), 98% of the –Cl was reacted through the calculation. (b) Bromoethane
(5.9 g, 54.1 mmol), PS-DHEA (10.0 g) and acetonitrile (70 mL) were added into
a 125 mL three-necked flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, the mixture was
heated at 80 °C for another 24 h. After reaction, the reaction mixture was
cooled down to room temperature. The liquid phase was poured off, and the
solid residue was washed with ethyl acetate three times. Then, the solid was
dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 12 h and PS-DHEEAB was obtained. Based on
the similar procedure, PS-THEAB was synthesized respectively, using 2-
bromoethanol instead of bromoethane.
Acknowledgments
16. The amount of ionic liquid attached on the PS was determined from elemental
analysis: PS-DHEEAB (loading, 2.6 mmol/g), PS-THEAB (loading, 2.6 mmol/g),
PS-HEIMB (loading, 3.2 mmol/g), and PS-EIMB (loading, 3.2 mmol/g).
17. FT-IR spectroscopic studies were firstly carried out with PS-DHEEAB, support
PS and the active specie DHEDEAB. The results were compared with those of
the corresponding monomeric analogues. The samples were dried over
phosphorus pentoxide under vacuum at 70 °C for 48 h before detecting. Both
DHEDEAB and PS-DHEEAB display a typical strong peak corresponding to –OH
stretching frequency centered at about 3420 cmÀ1, and a typical peak centered
at 1265 cmÀ1 in PS corresponding to the stretching frequency of the functional
group –CH2Cl disappears in the spectra of PS-DHEEAB, suggesting the complete
modification of PS.
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Pro-
gram of China (2009CB219901), and the National Science Fund of
China (21006117 and 20936005). The authors gratefully acknowl-
edge Professor Suojiang Zhang for his guidance and meaningful
discussion in this work.
References and notes
18. Cycloaddition procedure for the reaction of propylene oxide (PO) with CO2: All the
1. (a) Sakakura, T.; Choi, J. C.; Yasuda, H. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2365–2387; (b)
North, M.; Pasquale, R.; Young, C. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1514–1539; (c)
Schaffner, B.; Schaffner, F.; Verevkin, S. P.; Borner, A. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110,
4554–4581.
2. (a) Decortesl, A.; Kleij, A. W. ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 831–834; (b)
Barkakaty, B.; Morino, K.; Sudo, A.; Endo, T. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 42–
44; (c) Miao, C. X.; Wang, J. Q.; Wu, Y.; Du, Y.; He, L. N. ChemSusChem
2008, 1, 236–241; (d) Melendez, J.; North, M.; Pasquale, R. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2007, 3323–3326.
coupling reactions were conducted in
a 100 mL stainless-steel reactor
equipped with a magnetic stirrer and automatic temperature control system.
A typical reaction was carried out as follows: In the reactor, an appropriate CO2
(ꢀ1.0 MPa) was added to a mixture of PO (7.0 mL, 0.1 mol), and catalyst
(2.0 mmol) at room temperature. Then, the temperature was raised to 110 °C
with the addition of CO2 from a reservoir tank to maintain a constant pressure
(2.0 MPa). After the reaction had proceeded for 2.0 h, the reactor was cooled to
ambient temperature, and the remaining CO2 and PO were removed and
absorbed in the saturation solution of Na2CO3. The catalyst was separated by
filtration, and the products were isolated and analyzed by Agilent 6890/5973
GC–MS equipped with a FID detector and a DB-wax. The catalyst was washed
3. (a) Wong, W. L.; Cheung, K. C.; Chan, P. H.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Lee, K. H.; Wong, K. Y.
Chem. Commun. 2007, 2175–2177; (b) Wong, W. L.; Chan, P. H.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Lee,
K. H.; Cheung, K. C.; Wong, K. Y. ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 67–70; (c) Haak, R. M.;