4
42 J ournal of Natural Products, 2001, Vol. 64, No. 4
Haribal et al.
+
+
2
(
46 (M + H) , 214, 168, 145, 84 (M + H - 162) ; HRESIMS
2,3,4,6-Tetr a -O-a cetyla llia r in osid e a n d Its tr a n s-Iso-
m er (2 a n d 4). To a solution of diethyl cynomethylphospho-
nate (100 mg, 0.564 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added LDA
+
M + Na) , m/z 268.0807; calcd for C10
Acid Hyd r olysis of Allia r in osid e (1). Alliarinoside (5 mg)
was heated with 1 M HCl (2 mL) at 80 °C for 3 h. The reaction
and
15 6
H O NNa 268.0797.
(1.5 M, 0.38 mL) at -78 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred
at -78 °C for 1 h, and then the aldehyde 7 (220 mg, 0.564
mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added at -78 °C. The reaction
mixture was stirred, slowly warmed to 0 °C, and quenched
mixture was extracted with 6 mL (3 × 2 times) of CHCl
3
EtOAc each. The aqueous solution was evaporated to dryness
under reduced pressure and used for preparation of a TMS
derivative. The TMS derivative was prepared by adding 1 mL
of TRI-SIL ‘Z’ to the residue and heating the mixture at 60 °C
for 20 min. The reaction mixture was directly injected into GC.
TMS glucose was confirmed by comparison with an authentic
material prepared in similar a manner. Another batch of
compound (1 mg) was hydrolyzed in the same way, and the
aqueous fraction was directly injected into the mass spectrom-
eter for analysis of hydrolysis products.
with saturated aqueous NH
rated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate
2 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with
brine (5 mL), dried (MgSO ), and concentrated in vacuo. The
4
Cl. The organic layer was sepa-
(
4
residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc-hex-
anes, 2:1) to yield the cis-alkenyl nitrile 2 (118 mg, 51%) as
colorless prisms, mp 84-86 °C, [R]
D
-4° (c, 0.4, CHCl
3
):
+
ESIMS 414 (M + H ), 331, 271, 169, 113, 98, 87, 79, 73, 60;
1
HRCIMS m/z 414.1390 (calcd for C18
NMR and 13C NMR identical to that of 2 obtained from natural
. Compound 2 was formed together with the trans-alkenyl
nitrile 4 (80 mg, 34%) as colorless needles, mp 86-88 °C, [R]
24 1
H N O10 414.1400); H
P er a cetyla ted Allia r in osid e (2). Alliarinoside (5 mg) was
heated in Ac O-pyridine (1:1, 3 mL) at 60 °C for 4 h. The
2
1
reaction mixture was worked up in the usual way to obtain 2
D
as a colorless crystalline compound: UV (MeOH) λmax 218 nm;
1
-
23.1° (c, 0.3, CHCl
6.0, 4.0 Hz, H-3), 5.63 (1H, dt, J ) 16.0, 2.4 Hz, H-2), 5.23
1H, dd, J ) 9.6, 9.6 Hz, H-3′), 5.10 (1H, dd, J ) 9.6, 9.6 Hz,
3 3
): H NMR (CDCl ) δ 6.71 (1H, dt, J )
1
H NMR (CDCl ) δ 6.58 (1H, ddd, J ) 11.2, 6.8, 5.6 Hz, H-3),
3
1
5
.48 (1H, dd, J ) 11.2, 1.6 Hz, H-2), 5.22 (1H, dd, J ) 9.6, 9.6
(
Hz, H-3′), 5.10 (1H, dd, J ) 9.6, 9.6 Hz, H-4′), 5.02 (1H, dd,
J ) 9.6, 8.0 Hz, H-2′), 4.59 (1H, ddd, J ) 14.4, 5.6, 1.6 Hz,
H-4a), 4.57 (1H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, H-1′), 4.53 (1H, dd, J ) 14.4,
H-4′), 5.06 (1H, dd, J ) 9.6, 8.0 Hz, H-2′), 4.56 (1H, d, J ) 8.0
Hz, H-1′), 4.52 (1H, ddd, J ) 16.8, 4.0, 2.4 Hz, H-4a), 4.26 (1H,
dd, J ) 12.4, 4.8 Hz, H-6a′), 4.23 (1H, ddd, J ) 16.8, 4.0, 2.4
Hz, H-4b), 4.16 (1H, dd, J ) 12.4, 2.4 Hz, H-6b′), 3.72 (1H,
ddd, 9.6, 4.8, 2.4 Hz, H-5′), 2.10, 2.07, 2.04, 2.03 (s 3H each
6
.8 Hz, H-4b), 4.26 (1H, dd, J ) 12.4, 4.8 Hz, H-6a′), 4.17 (1H,
dd, J ) 12.4, 2.4 Hz, H-6b′), 3.73 (1H, ddd, J ) 9.6, 4.8, 2.4
1
3
Hz, H-5′), 2.12, 2.06, 2.04, 2.01 (3H, s each, COCH
3
;
C NMR
1
3
COCH
1
7
(
4
3
); C NMR (CDCl
49.0 (C-3), 117.1 (C-1), 100.5 (C-1′), 100.4 (C-2), 72.7 (C-3′),
2.3 (C-2′), 71.2 (C-4′), 68.4 (C-4a), 68.4 (C-4b), 67.5 (C-5′), 61.9
); ESIMS
14 (M + H ), 331, 271, 169, 113, 98, 87, 79, 73, 60; HRCIMS
10 414.1400).
Hyd r olysis of 2 a n d 4. The acetylated compound (2, 5-6
mg) was dissolved in 0.5 mL of dry MeOH, and anhydrous K
CO was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature
3
) δ 170.8, 170.4, 169.5, 169.4 (CO),
(
(
(
(
4
CDCl ) δ 170.8, 170.4, 170.1, 169.7 (CO), 150.5 (C-3), 116
C-1), 102.1 (C-1′), 100.9 (C-2), 73.5 (C-2′), 72.6 (C-3′), 72.0
C-4′), 69.4 (C-4a), 69.4 (C-4b), 67.9 (C-5′), 62.7 (C-6a′), 62.7
3
C-6a′), 61.9 (C-6b′), 20.9, 20.9, 20.8, 20.8 (COCH
3
3
C-6b′), 20.7, 20.7, 20.6, 20.6 (COCH ); positive-ion ESIMS m/z
+
+
+
+
14 (M + H) , 383 (M + H - 31) , 372 (M + H - 42) , 84
m/z 414.1405 (calcd for C18
24 1
H N O
+
(
M + H - 330) .
-O-Allyl-2,3,4,6-tetr a-O-acetyl-â-D-glu copyr an oside (6).
To a mixture of tetra-O-acetyl-R-glucosyl bromide (5) (206 mg,
.5 mmol), allyl alcohol (44 mg, 0.75 mmol), and 4 Å molecular
sieves (150 mg) in CH Cl (5 mL) was added silver triflate (193
1
2
-
3
0
for 4 h. The reaction was monitored by ESIMS to detect the
formation of 1. The resultant mixture was filtered through
glass wool and separated by repeated HPLC to give 1.
Bioa ssa ys. Choice bioassays for feeding deterrent/inhibitor
activity were conducted with neonate larvae of P. napi olera-
cea. Two 1.5 cm disks of cabbage leaves were used as test
substrate. One disk was treated with the sample to be tested,
and the other was treated with solvent alone. Five to eight
replicates were used for each test. In the case of the natural
compound 0.1 g leaf equivalent of sample dissolved in 20 µL
of MeOH was applied on both sides of each test disk. For the
synthetic compound, although the amount was not verified, a
sample of UV absorbance similar to that for the natural
compound was used (to ensure comparable amount of natural
and synthetic alliarinoside). Two disks were mounted on insect
pins that were affixed to the bottom of waxed paper cups, 10
cm wide and 5 cm deep, lined with moistened filter paper. The
pins were placed in a way that there was a slight overlap of
two disks to enable neonate larvae to move from one disk to
the other. Eggs from P. napi oleracea were collected on a
Parafilm layer so that the hatching larvae had no contact with
the host plants. Either four or five freshly emerged neonates
were transferred to the disks. The cups were covered with an
airtight lid and placed in a larger box lined with moistened
paper napkins to keep the humidity high to prevent the disks
from desiccating. This box was kept in an incubator for 18 h
at 28 °C. Activity was expressed as numerical values based
on the area that was consumed. This was done visually as
follows: 0 ) no feeding; 1 ) <5% of the disk; 2 ) >5% and
<10%; and 3 ) >10%. Ranks were assigned to both control
and treated disks.
2
2
mg, 0.75 mmol) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred
vigorously at 0 °C for 40 min, and the mixture was filtered
through a pad of silica gel. The filtrate was washed with
saturated NaHCO and brine, dried with MgSO , and concen-
3 4
trated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatog-
raphy (EtOAc-hexanes, 1:2) to afford the glucoside 6 (106 mg,
5
5%) as colorless prisms, mp 86-88 °C, [R] -22.6° (c, 1.8,
D
1
3 3
CHCl ): H NMR (CDCl ) δ 5.81 (1H, dddd, J ) 17.2, 10.4,
6
.4, 4.8 Hz), 5.24 (1H, ddd, J ) 17.2, 3.2, 1.6 Hz), 5.17 (1H,
ddd, J ) 10.4, 3.2, 1.6 Hz), 5.16 (1H, d, J ) 9.6 Hz), 5.06 (1H,
t, J ) 9.6 Hz), 4.99 (1H, dd, J ) 9.6, 8.0 Hz), 4.53 (1H, d, J )
8
.0 Hz), 4.30 (1H, ddt, J ) 13.2, 4.8, 1.6 Hz), 4.23 (1H, dd,
J ) 12.4, 4.8 Hz), 4.11 (1H, dd, J ) 12.4, 2.4 Hz), 4.06 (1H, tt,
6
2
1
7
.4, 1.6 Hz), 3.66 (1H, ddd, J ) 9.6, 4.8, 2.4 Hz), 2.05 (3H, s),
13
.01 (3H, s), 1.99 (3H, s), 1.97 (3H, s); C NMR (CDCl ) δ
3
70.6, 170.3, 169.4, 169.3, 133.3, 117.6, 99.6, 72.9, 71.8, 71.3,
0.0, 68.4, 61.9, 20.7, 20.7, 20.6, 20.6.
2
-(2′,3′,4′,6′-Tet r a -O-a cet yl-â-D-glu cop yr a n osyl)et h a -
n a l (7). The olefin 6 (24 mg, 0.062 mmol) in CH Cl (2 mL)
2
2
was cooled to -78 °C, and ozone was bubbled into the solution
at -78 °C until the solution appeared blue. The reaction
mixture was purged with nitrogen as it warmed to room
temperature. Dimethyl sulfide (20 µL) was added, and the
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight.
After washing with water (2 mL) and brine (2 mL), the solution
was dried (MgSO
The residue was purified by chromatography (EtOAc-hexanes,
:1) to afford aldehyde 7 (20 mg, 83%) as colorless oil, [R]
4
), and the solvent was removed in vacuo.
1
-
1
D
1
23.5° (c, 0.7, CHCl
.6, 0.8 Hz), 5.24 (1H, t, J ) 9.6 Hz), 5.10 (1H, dd, J ) 9.6, 8.0
Hz), 5.09 (1H, t, J ) 9.6 Hz), 4.60 (1H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz), 4.28
1H, dd, J ) 17.2, 0.8 Hz), 4.25 (1H, dd, J ) 12.4, 5.2 Hz),
.19 (1H, dd, J ) 17.2, 1.6 Hz), 4.12 (1H, dd, J ) 12.4, 2.4
Hz), 3.72 (1H, ddd, J ) 9.6, 5.2, 2.4 Hz), 2.09 (3H, s), 2.09
3 3
): H NMR (CDCl ) δ 9.68 (1H, dd, J )
Sta tistica l An a lyses. Ranks assigned to disks were com-
pared by Wilcoxon’s nonparametric sign rank test for paired
samples (Siegel and Castallen).13
(
4
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported by NSF
grant no. DEB-9419797 to Dr. Alan Renwick and NIH grant
no. GM53830 to Dr. J errold Meinwald. We thank Dr. Bruce
Ganem for the use of the Perkin-Elmer IR spectrophotometer.
1
3
(
1
6
3H, s), 2.04 (3H, s), 2.02 (3H, s); C NMR (in CDCl
3
) δ 199.8,
70.6, 170.2, 160.4, 160.3, 100.9, 74.1, 72.5, 72.1, 70.9, 68.3,
1.3, 20.7, 20.7, 20.6, 20.6.