Organic Letters
abstraction of a benzylic hydrogen atom that directly
functionalizes the benzylic C−H bond.
3
The treatment of arylacetic acid 1a with 1-(benzyloxy)-1λ -
benzo[d][1,2]iodaoxol-3(1H)-one (IBB) in the presence of
Ru(bpy) ·2PF as the photoredox catalyst (PC) under blue
3
6
light irradiation afforded the resulting product 3a in a 78%
isolated yield (Table 1, entry 1). The yield significantly
a
Table 1. Screening of the Reaction Conditions
entry
photoredox catalyst (PC)
solvent
NMR yield (%)
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ru(bpy) ·2PF
CH Cl
78
3
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
CH Cl
21
31
15
23
28
60
36
34
13
10
2
PC1
PC2
PC3
PC4
CH Cl
2
CH Cl
2
CH Cl
2
CH Cl
2
Ru(bpy) ·2PF
ClCH CH Cl
3
6
2
2
Ru(bpy) ·2PF
CHCl3
3
6
6
6
6
Ru(bpy) ·2PF
CH CN
3
3
10
1
Ru(bpy) ·2PF
DMF
3
c
1
Ru(bpy) ·2PF
CH Cl
2
3
2
a
Reaction conditions are as follows: 1a (0.4 mmol), 2a (1 mmol), and
a
b
c
PC (0.01 mmol) in solvent (2 mL) for 24 h. Isolated yield. Without
blue light irradiation.
b
2
mmol scale.
decreased when the reaction was performed in the absence of
the catalyst (Table 1, entry 2). Notably, the addition of other
catalysts such as PC1−4 did not increase the yield compared
with that of the noncatalytic conditions (Table 1, entry 2 vs
entries 3−6). Then, the solvent effect was investigated.
Employing less polar 1,2-dichloroethane provided the product
in a 60% yield, whereas much more polar solvents such as
chloroform, acetonitrile, and DMF suppressed the reaction
tron-donating group-substituted benzoates reacted to give 3e−
3g in moderate yields. We then investigated the scope of the
arylacetic acid derivatives. Electron-donating methoxy- and
methyl-substituted phenylacetic acid were efficiently converted
to the corresponding products 4a and 4b in 63% and 72%
yields, respectively. Thienylacetic acid or naphthylacetic acid
was transformed into product 4c or 4d, respectively, in a
moderate yield. Diphenylacetic acid and adamantanecarboxylic
acid, which provides a secondary or tertiary radical, gave 4e
and 4f in a 43% and 35% yields, respectively. To show the
utility of the reaction, we converted a variety of pharmaceut-
(
Table 1, entries 7−10, respectively). It is notable that the
reaction slightly proceeded without the irradiation of blue light
Table 1, entry 11). Overall, the combination of the Ru(bpy)3·
PF catalyst and CH Cl as the solvent resulted in the best
(
9
2
icals that had an arylacetic acid moiety. Fortunately,
6
2
2
yield.
flurbiprofen, ketoprofen, and isoxepac were smoothly con-
verted to the corresponding products in moderate to good
yields (4g−4i, respectively).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we then investigated
the scope of the reaction (Figure 2). The reaction was
applicable to other hypervalent iodine compounds. The
reaction with chlorinated hypervalent iodine compound 2b
provided 3b in a 47% yield. Furthermore, not only the cyclic
reagent but also other hypervalent iodine reagents were utilized
in the reaction. The reaction of 1a with benzoate- or
naphthoate-substituted hypervalent iodine (2c or 2d, respec-
tively) gave the product in a 50% and 43% yield, respectively.
Gratifyingly, electron-withdrawing group-substituted or elec-
During the course of our study, we disclosed that the
10−12
benzylic C−H bond could be converted to a C−O bond
under similar reaction conditions via hydrogen atom transfer.
The treatment of 4-phenyltoluene (5a) with PIDA in CH Cl
1
3
2
2
in the presence of PC4 (for the structure, see Table 1) as the
catalyst under blue light irradiation afforded 6a in a 51% yield.
The reaction proceeded with a variety of substrates (Figure 3).
3
4-Propylbiphenyl (5b), which has secondary benzylic C(sp )−
5
114
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5113−5117