ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
reduction potential of 1 (Ered = 1.12 V vs. SCE) in the presence of
HOTf (2.5 mM), as given by eqn (8), where e is the elementary charge.
Lipscomb, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2008, 4, 186; (e) J. M. Bollinger, Jr. and
DOI: 10.1039/C9CC03245B
5
(b) T. Fujii, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Funahashi, T. Ozawa, T. Tosha, T.
Kitagawa and H. Masuda, Chem. Commun., 2006, 4428; (c) Y. M. Kim,
K.-B. Cho, J. Cho, B. Wang, C. Li, S. Shaik and W. Nam, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2013, 135, 8838.
–
∆Get = e(Ered – Eox
)
(8)
The driving force dependence of logarithm of the rate constants of
outer-sphere electron transfer (ket) from one-electron donors (i.e.,
ferrocene derivatives) to 1 in the presence of HOTf (2.5 mM) in
MeCN at 233 K is shown in Figure 3 (black circles), where the log ket
values11 are plotted against the –ΔGet values. The driving force
dependence of ket is well fitted by the black line in Figure 3 using eqn
6
7
8
Karlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 7055.
(
7) with the λ value of 2.32 eV.11 The rate constants of electron
transfer from anthracene derivatives (kox) to 1 are also plotted against
ΔGet values in Figure 3 (red circles), where the driving force
(a) D. Kumar, W. Thiel and S. P. de Visser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,
133, 3869; (b) Y.-M. Lee, S. Hong, Y. Morimoto, W. Shin, S.
Fukuzumi and W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 10668; (c) J.
Cho, J. Woo and W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134 ,11112.
(a) M. Guo, T. Corona, K. Ray and W. Nam, ACS Cent. Sci., 2019, 5,
–
dependence of kox is fitted with somewhat smaller reorganization
energy of λ = 1.53 eV (red line in Fig. 3). The smaller λ value for the
case of anthracene derivatives in the Marcus plot compared with that
of outer-sphere electron transfer from one-electron donors (i.e.,
ferrocene derivatives) to 1 may be accounted by much faster electron
1
3; (b) H. B. Gray and J. R. Winkler, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 1850;
(c) S. Fukuzumi, T. Kojima, Y.-M. Lee and W. Nam, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 2017, 333, 44; (d) M. Puri and L. Que, Jr., Acc. Chem. Res., 2015,
48, 2443.
(a) C.-W. Chiang, S. T. Kleespies, H. D. Stout, K. K. Meier, P.-Y. Li,
E. L. Bominaar, L. Que, Jr., E. Münck and W.-Z. Lee, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2014, 136, 10846; (b) S. Hong, K. D. Sutherlin, J. Park, E. Kwon,
M. A. Siegler, E. I. Solomon and W. Nam, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5,
exchange
between
9,10-dimethylanthracene
and
9,10-
8
–1 –1 18a
dimethylanthracene radical cation (5.0 10 M s ) compared to
that between ferrocene and ferrocenium cation (5.3 10 M s ) in
MeCN
9
6
–1 –1
1
8b
and small bond reorganization energy of anthracene
1
2c
derivatives, which are delocalized π-compounds.
5
440; (c) A. Kunishita, M. Kubo, H. Sugimoto, T. Ogura, K. Sato, T.
In conclusion, aromatic hydroxylation of anthracene by 1 has been
made possible in the presence of HOTf to produce anthraquinone,
which is the fully oxidized (six-electron oxidation) product of
anthracene. The reaction proceeds via the rate-determining PCET
from anthracene to 1, followed by the subsequent fast oxidation
reactions all the way to anthraquinone. In addition, no KIE (i.e., KIE
Takui and S. Itoh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 2788; (d) M. T.
Kieber-Emmons, J. Annaraj, M. S. Seo, K. M. Van Heuvelen, T. Tosha,
T. Kitagawa, T. C. Brunold, W. Nam and C. G. Riordan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 14230.
0 (a) M. Sankaralingam, Y.-M. Lee, W. Nam and S. Fukuzumi, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2018, 365, 41; (b) A. D. Ure and A. R. McDonald, Synlett,
1
1
2
015, 26, 2060.
1 T. Devi, Y.-M. Lee, W. Nam and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
018, 140, 8372.
derivatives to 1 were evaluated in comparison with the outer-sphere 12 (a) C. M. Bathelt, L. Ridder, A. J. Mulholland and J. N. Harvey, J. Am.
=
1) also suggests no involvement of C-H bond cleavage in the rate-
determining step, which is PCET. The rates of PCET from anthracene
2
electron-transfer reactions from one-electron donors to 1 in the
presence of HOTf in light of the Marcus theory of electron transfer.
This study provides valuable mechanistic insight into the
hydroxylation of aromatic substrates by metal-superoxo species via
the rate-limiting PCET process.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 15004; (b) M. Asaka and H. Fujii, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2016, 138, 8048; (c) N. Sharma, J. Jung, Y.-M. Lee, M. S. Seo,
W. Nam and S. Fukuzumi, Chem. Eur. J., 2017, 23, 7125.
1
1
3 (a) S. P. de Visser, K. Oh, A.-R. Han and W. Nam, Inorg. Chem., 2007,
4
6, 4632; (b) D. Kumar, G. N. Sastry and S. P. de Visser, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2012, 116, 718.
This work was supported by a SENTAN project from Japan Sci-
ence and Technology Agency (JST) to S.F. and JSPS KAKENHI (No.
4 (a) J. Cho, J. Woo and W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 5958;
(b) J. Cho, J. Woo and W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 11112;
(c) T. Devi, Y.-M. Lee, J. Jung, M. Sankaralingam, W. Nam and S.
Fukuzumi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 129, 3564.
1
6H02268 to S.F.) from MEXT, Japan, and the NRF of Korea through
CRI (NRF-2012R1A3A2048842 to W.N), GRL (NRF-2010-00353 to
W.N.), and Basic Science Research Program
2017R1D1A1B03029982 to Y.-M.L. and 2017R1D1A1B03032615
to S.F.).
1
5 (a) J. Park, Y. Morimoto, Y.-M. Lee, W. Nam and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 3903; (b) Y. Morimoto, H. Kotani, J. Park, Y.-
M. Lee, W. Nam and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 403.
6 H.-G. Korth and P. Mulder, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 7674.
7 It should be noted that, in the oxidation of anthracene by
(
1
1
IV
2+
References
[Cr (TMC)(O)] in the presence of HOTf at 233K, almost no reaction
occurred (see Fig. S9, ESI†), indicating that Cr(III)-superoxo complex
1
(a) X. Huang and J. T. Groves, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 2491; (b) S.
Sahu and D. P. Goldberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 11410; (c) S.
Hong, Y.-M. Lee, K. Ray and W. Nam, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2017, 334,
(1) is the actual reactive intermediate for the oxidation of anthracene.
1
8 (a) R. A. Marcus, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1964, 15, 155; (b) R. A.
Marcus and N. Sutin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Rev. Bioenerg., 1985,
2
5; (d) W. Nam. Acc. Chem. Res., 2015, 48, 2415.
8
1
11, 265; (c) R. A. Marcus, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32,
111; (d) J. Park, Y. Morimoto, Y.-M. Lee, W. Nam and S. Fukuzumi,
2
3
4
(a) D. A. Quist, D. E. Diaz, J. J. Liu and K. D. Karlin, J. Biol. Inorg.
Chem., 2017, 22, 253; (b) G. Yin, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 483; (c)
J. A. Kovacs, Acc. Chem. Res., 2015, 48, 2744.
(a) A. Mukherjee, M. A. Cranswick, M. Chakrabarti, T. K. Paine, K.
Fujisawa, E. Münck and L. Que, Jr., Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 3618; (b)
S. Fukuzumi and K. D. Karlin, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2013, 257, 187.
(a) C. E. Elwell, N. L. Gagnon, B. D. Neisen, D. Dhar, A. D. Spaeth,
G. M. Yee and W. B. Tolman, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 2059; (b) W. A.
van der Donk, C. Krebs and J. M. Bollinger, Jr., Curr. Opin. Struct.
Biol., 2010, 20, 673; (c) J. J. Liu, D. E. Diaz, D. A. Quist and K. D.
Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 3618.
1
9 (a) S. Fukuzumi, I. Nakanishi and K. Tanaka, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999,
1
03, 11212; (b) E. S. Yang, M.-S. Chan and A. C. Wahl, J. Phys.
Chem., 1980, 84, 3094; (c) S. Fukuzumi, S. Mochizuki and T. Tanaka,
Inorg. Chem., 1989, 28, 2459.
4
| J. Name., 2016, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016