X. Wang et al.
AppliedCatalysisA,General545(2017)79–89
condensation.
2.3. Catalytic activity
The catalytic conversions of propionic acid and 3-pentanone were
investigated in a fixed-bed quartz tube (o.d. =6 mm) reactor. The
catalyst sample (40–60 mesh) was packed in the middle of the reactor
and pretreated in flowing Ar at 350 °C for 0.5 h before adjusted to the
reaction temperature. Liquid reactant was fed from a 5 mL Hamilton
syringe using a KDS-100 syringe pump (KD Scientific), and was va-
porized before entering the reactor. Argon was used as the carrier gas
with a Feed/Ar molar ratio of 1/25. The space time (W/F, defined as
weight of catalyst (g) to the flow rate of the organic feed (g/h)) was
adjusted from 0.02 to 3.5 gcat·h/greactant (h) to monitor the major pro-
ducts evolution. The stream after reaction was maintained at 220 °C to
avoid any condensation and sampled frequently through a six-port
valve to an online gas chromatograph (GC 7890B, Agilent) for products
quantification. The GC was equipped with an HP-Innowax column
(60 m × 320 μm × 0.5 μm) and a flame ionic detector. N2 was used as
carrier gas for GC, and a column flow rate of 1.8 mL/min with a split
ratio of 20 was used. The column was heated from 40 to 240 °C in
several steps with different heating rates to achieve good separation of
products. The reaction effluents were finally trapped in a methanol
solvent at 0 °C in an ice-water bath. The resulting solution was injected
to an offline gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC–MS,
Shimadzu QP2010SE) for products qualification. The GC–MS was also
equipped with an HP-Innowax column (30 m × 320 μm × 0.5 μm),
and operated under a similar condition to that of online GC. The con-
version (%) is defined as 100% × [(moles of carbon of reactant in the
feed) − (moles of carbon of reactant in the effluent)]/(moles of carbon
of reactant in the feed). Because CO2 cannot be monitored by FID, and
taking into account the reaction stoichiometry of ketonization, the yield
(%) is defined as 100% × [6 × (moles of carbon of product in the ef-
fluent)]/[5 × (moles of carbon of reactant in the feed)] for the pro-
pionic acid feed. For the 3-pentanone feed, the yield (%) is defined as
100% × (moles of carbon of product in the effluent)/(moles of carbon
of reactant in the feed). The selectivity (%) is defined as 100% × yield/
conversion. The uncertainties from multiple runs were within 2%.
CO2 produced in the reaction was quantified for selected runs using
another 7890B GC, equipped with a thermal conductive detector and a
Porapak Q column. The carbon balance was estimated to be higher than
95%.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation
The HZSM-5 catalyst (denoted as HZ) was obtained by calcination of
NH4ZSM-5 (Zeolyst, CBV 8014, Si/Al = 40, SBET = 425 m2/g) at
550 °C for 8 h. Ion exchange of NH4ZSM-5 (2 g) with different con-
centrations (0.01, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 M) of NaNO3 solution (100 mL) was
carried out at 80 °C for 5 h. The resulting material was filtered, washed
with de-ionized water, and dried overnight at 100 °C. The ion-exchange
procedure was performed once in 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 M NaNO3 solution,
while it was repeated 4 times in 1 M NaNO3 solution to maximize the
degree of exchange. Finally, these samples were calcined at 550 °C for
8 h to obtain the HNaZSM-5 catalysts, which were denoted as HNaZ-1,
HNaZ-2, HNaZ-3 and HNaZ-4, respectively, corresponding to NaNO3
concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 M, respectively. The resulting
catalyst powder was pressed, crushed, and sieved to 40–60 mesh for
catalytic evaluation.
2.2. Catalyst characterization
Elemental analysis was done on a VISTA-MPX inductively coupled
plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES). The samples were
dissolved in HF solution and diluted before measurements. The powder
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured on a Rigaku D/max
2500 diffractometer, with a Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 200 mA) source.
Data was collected in 2θ range of 4−60° at a scanning rate of 4°/min.
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of gold-coated samples
were recorded on a FEI NANOSEM430 instrument. N2 adsorption was
carried out on a Tristar 3000 analyzer (Micromeritics) at liquid nitrogen
temperature. Prior to the experiments, samples were outgassed at
300 °C for 3 h.
The diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy
(DRIFTS) was conducted on a PerkinElmer Frontier spectrometer,
equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooled mercury cadmium telluride
(MCT) detector, a diffuse reflectance accessory and a reaction chamber
(Harrick). The catalyst powder was pretreated in flowing He (30 mL/
min) stream at 450 °C for 1 h. Following that, the sample was cooled to
20 °C, and the DRIFTS was recorded with 128 scans at a resolution of
2 cm−1. The spectrum of KBr powder was used as a reference. For the
experiments of pyridine adsorption, the sample after pretreatment was
cooled to 100 °C, and a background spectrum was recorded. The pyr-
idine vapor was introduced for 10 min and the sample was held at this
temperature for another 20 min. Then the temperature was increased to
150 °C and maintained for 30 min. The DRIFTS spectra of pyridine
Temperature-programmed reaction of propionic acid over HZ and
HNaZ-4 were studied in the TPD system, as described in previous sec-
tion. Catalyst sample of 50 mg (40–60 mesh) was pretreated in a
flowing He stream (30 mL/min) at 400 °C for 1 h before the tempera-
ture was reduced to 100 °C and propionic acid of 1 μL was injected
manually. The injection was repeated 16 times every 3 min to ensure
the saturated adsorption of propionic acid on the catalyst surface. The
sample was then flushed by flowing He (70 mL/min) for 1 h to remove
weakly adsorbed propionic acid. After that, the He flow rate was re-
duced to 30 mL/min, and the sample was kept at 100 °C for an addi-
tional 15 min to ensure the MS signals returned to the base line. Finally,
the sample was heated to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
adsorption were then recorded with 32 scans at a resolution of 8 cm−1
.
Temperature programmed desorption of NH3 (NH3-TPD) and iso-
propylamine (IPA-TPD) were performed in a quartz tube reactor
(o.d.= 6 mm), equipped with temperature controller and gas delivery
system, as has been reported in previous work [24]. The catalyst sample
of 50 mg (40–60 mesh) were pretreated in flowing He (30 mL/min) at
400 °C for 1 h and then cooled to 100 °C. The sample was then exposed
to NH3 (2% NH3/He, 30 mL/min) for 30 min or to IPA (2 μL/pulse,
pulse/3 min, 10 pulses). After that, the sample was flushed with He
flow for 1 h to remove weakly adsorbed NH3 or IPA, followed by
heating up to 650 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The effluent was monitored
by a Cirrus 200 mass spectrometer (MKS). Temperature Programmed
Oxidation (TPO) of spent catalyst sample was performed in the same
system. In this case, the sample (50 mg) was heated from 30 to 900 °C
in flowing 5% O2/He (30 mL/min) with a linear heating rate of 10 °C/
min. Quantification was carried out by injecting 250 μL of NH3, pro-
pylene, CO2 and CO pulses to the He stream using a six-port valve.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalysts characterization
Table 1 summarizes the chemical analysis results from ICP. The Si/
Al ratio is similar to the manufacture provided value of 40, and changes
slightly after Na exchange. The Na/Al ratio increases with the in-
creasing Na concentration as well as exchange cycles, indicating that Na
was successfully loaded onto the zeolites. Fig. 1 compares the XRD
patterns of HZ and HNaZ-4 samples. Although the peak intensity was
slightly reduced for HNaZ-4, it is evident that the MFI structure of ZSM-
5 zeolite was well preserved after ion exchange. The morphology of the
zeolite was shown in SEM images. The HZ particles have irregular shape
80