F. H. Arnold et al.
and RH-47) that showed the highest turnovers with different enantiose-
lectivity were grown on a 500 mL scale and purified as described above.
[4] V. B. Valodkar, G. L. Tembe, R. N. Ram, H. S. Rama, Catal. Lett.
2003, 90, 91–94.
[
[
5] C. A. Martinez, J. D. Stewart, Curr. Org. Chem. 2000, 4, 263–282.
6] S. J. Elliott, M. Zhu, L. Tso, H. H. T. Nguyen, J. H. K. Yip, S. I.
Chan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9949–9955.
Quantification of epoxides by the NBP method: Epoxides were quanti-
fied using NBP under conditions described in the “High-throughput ep-
oxide formation assay” section. Enzymatic reactions were performed on
a 0.6 mL scale in 1.7 mL tubes. Calibration of the epoxide was conducted
using a standard reagent of 1,2-epoxyhexane.
[
[
[
7] K. McClay, B. G. Fox, R. J. Steffan, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000,
6
6, 1877–1882.
8] A. Schmid, K. Hofstetter, H. J. Feiten, F. Hollmann, B. Witholt,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 732–737.
9] A. F. Dexter, F. J. Lakner, R. A. Campbell, L. P. Hager, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6412–6413.
Chiral gas chromatography: A CycloSil-B chiral capillary column (Agi-
lent Technologies, 30 m length, 0.32 mm ID, 0.25 mm film thickness) and
a Flame Ionization Detector (FID) were used. The reaction products
were determined and quantified by using standard racemic epoxides and
alcohols. The absolute configurations of epoxides were determined by
comparing the reaction product with a standard (R)-enantiomer-enriched
epoxide in the case of 1,2-epoxyhexane and 1,2-epoxyoctane. For 1,2-ep-
oxypentane and 1,2-epoxyheptane, the standard (S)-enantiomer-enriched
epoxides were prepared using the yeast strain Rhodosporidium toruloides
[
10] K. Furuhashi, Biological Routes to Optically Active Epoxides, Wiley,
New York, 1992, pp. 167–186.
11] A. Archelas, R. Furstoss, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1997, 51, 491–525.
12] M. Tokunaga, J. F. Larrow, F. Kakiuchi, E. N. Jacobsen, Science
[
[
1
997, 277, 936–938.
[
[
13] A. W. Munro, D. G. Leys, K. J. McLean, K. R. Marshall, T. W. B.
Ost, S. Daff, C. S. Miles, S. K. Chapman, D. A. Lysek, C. C. Moser,
C. C. Page, P. L. Dutton, Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 250–257;
V. B. Urlacher, S. Lutz-Wahl, R. D. Schmid, Appl. Microbiol. Bio-
technol. 2004, 64, 317–325.
14] M. W. Peters, P. Meinhold, A. Glieder, F. H. Arnold, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 13442–13450.
15] E. T. Farinas, M. Alcalde, F. Arnold, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 525–528.
16] D. C. Haines, D. R. Tomchick, M. Machius, J. A. Peterson, Biochem-
istry 2001, 40, 13456–13465.
(
ATCC 10657) expressing an epoxide hydrolase that is known to hydro-
[
34]
lyze (R)-epoxides preferentially. Conditions for GC analysis for 1,2-ep-
oxyhexane were: isothermal at 708C for 2.5 min, linear gradient to 2008C
in 13min and isothermal at 200 8C for 5 min. The conditions were slightly
modified for different epoxides. The separation of the R and S enantio-
mers of the epoxides gave the following retention times: 5.04 and
5
.14 min (1,2-epoxypentane), 5.21 and 5.29 min (1,2-epoxyhexane), 14.17
[
[
and 14.35 min (1,2-epoxyheptane) and 19.39 and 19.46 min (1,2-epoxyoc-
tane).
Analysis of alkene epoxidation and alkane hydroxylation: Oxidations of
[
[
[
17] F. Zocher, M. M. Enzelberger, U. T. Bornscheuer, B. Hauer, R. D.
1
-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, styrene, and n-hexane were
Schmid, Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 391, 345–351.
performed on 1 mL scale in phosphate buffer (pH 8, 100 mm) containing
P450, substrate, and 1% ethanol in 1.7 mL tubes. Reactions were started
by adding NADPH (dissolved in buffer). After reaction, a solution of 1-
octanol in ethanol (10 mL; 10 mm) was added as the internal standard
and chloroform (300 mL) was also added to extract products. The tubes
were vortexed vigorously for 1 min, and subsequently centrifuged for
18] M. Alcalde, E. T. Farinas, F. H. Arnold, J. Biomol. Screening 2004, 9,
1
41–146.
19] S. Graham-Lorence, G. Truan, J. A. Peterson, J. R. Falck, S. Z. Wei,
C. Helvig, J. H. Capdevila, J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 1127–1135;
Q. S. Li, J. Ogawa, R. D. Schmid, S. Shimizu, FEBS Lett. 2001, 508,
49–252.
20] R. Sinigalia, R. A. Michelin, F. Pinna, G. Strukul, Organometallics
987, 6, 728–734; R. I. Kureshy, N. H. Khan, S. H. R. Abdi, S. T.
Patel, P. Iyer, E. Suresh, P. Dastidar, J. Mol. Catal. A 2000, 160,
17–227.
2
1
min at 14000 rpm. The lower organic layer was collected and analyzed
[
by gas chromatography to determine total catalytic turnover numbers,
product distributions, and enantiomeric excess. Reactions were per-
formed in triplicate.
1
2
Epoxidation with NADPH regeneration: E coli cells were grown in a TB
culture (500 mL), and P450 expression was induced as described above.
Cells were collected, suspended in phosphate buffer (20 mL, 100 mm,
pH 8), and disrupted by sonication. The cell lysate was recovered by cen-
trifugation, and P450 concentration was measured by CO binding (SH-
[21] Y. Nishiyama, Y. Nakagawa, N. Mizuno, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113,
3751–3753; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3639–3641.
[22] Enzymes are rapidly inactivated. Initial rates on 1-hexene epoxida-
À1
tion are very high (80 turnovers min for S-44 and 160 turnovers
À1
min for R-47).
4
4, 63 mm, RH-47, 30 mm). Epoxidation reactions were performed in a vial
[23] P. R. Ortiz de Montellano, M. A. Correia, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.
Toxicol. 1983, 23, 481–503.
(
12 mL), with phosphate buffer (100 mm, pH 8), E. coli cell lysate con-
taining P450 and the alcohol dehydrogenase from Thermoanaerobium
brockii (purchased from Sigma). The contents were mixed and the vial
sealed with a crimp cap (Agilent Technologies). Oxygen was initially
pressurized from the top and added every few hours using a syringe. 1-
Hexene was dissolved in 2-propanol (1m), and the solution was slowly
added to the vial with a syringe over a few hours with stirring. A portion
of the reaction mixture was sampled from the vial and extracted with
chloroform, and the extract was analyzed by gas chromatography. Total
reaction volume was 9 mL.
[24] K. He, Y. A. He, G. D. Szklarz, J. R. Halpert, M. A. Correia, J. Biol.
Chem. 1996, 271, 25864–25872.
[25] W. A. van der Donk, H. M. Zhao, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14,
421–426.
[26] R. Wichmann, D. Vasic-Racki, Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 2005,
92, 225–260.
[27] L. S. al-Kassim, C. S. Tsai, Biochem. Cell Biol. 1990, 68, 907–913.
[28] K. Hofstetter, J. Lutz, I. Lang, B. Witholt, A. Schmid, Angew. Chem.
2004, 116, 2215–2218; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2163–2166.
[
29] D. Munzer, P. Meinhold, M. W. Peters, S. Fiechtenhofer, H. Griengl,
A. Glieder, F. H. Arnold, A. de Raadt, Chem. Commun. 2005, 20,
2
597–2599.
30] A. Glieder, E. T. Farinas, F. H. Arnold, Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20,
135–1139.
Acknowledgements
[
[
1
The authors thank Dr. Nathan Dalleska for assistance with gas chroma-
tography. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation
BES-0313567), the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petrole-
um Research Fund (ACS PRF Alternative Energy Postdoctoral Fellow-
ship for MWP) and the Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.
31] E. T. Farinas, U. Schwaneberg, A. Glieder, F. H. Arnold, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2001, 343, 601–606.
32] T. Omura, R. Sato, J. Biol. Chem. 1964, 239, 2370–2378.
33] R. Higuchi, B. Krummel, R. K. Saiki, Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16,
(
[
[
7
351–7367.
[
34] A. L. Botes, C. A. G. M. Weijers, P. J. Botes, M. S. van Dyk, Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3327–3336.
[
[
1] T. Katsuki, K. B. Sharpless, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5974–5976.
2] W. Zhang, J. L. Loebach, S. R. Wilson, E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 2801–2803.
Received: May 26, 2005
[
3] E. Rose, Q. Z. Ren, B. Andrioletti, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 224–230.
Published online: October 20, 2005
1220
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1216 – 1220