Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of Mersicarpine
3
Scheme 3. Mn(OAc) Mediated Cyclization of a Keto-Ester
The inauguration of our synthetic efforts toward mersi-
carpine is presented in Scheme 2. N-Acylindoline 9 was
Scheme 2. Radical Cyclization to Form a
Dihydropyridoindolone
3
). Indoline 13 was prepared in a similar fashion to malonic
derivative 9. As treatment of 13 with Mn(OAc) led to
3
decomposition of the starting material, the oxidation of 13
with DDQ to produce indole 14 was employed as an
alternative. The malonic radical cyclization of 14 proceeded
as expected when performed in acetic acid to yield 15 in
55% yield. We were disappointed to observe that all attempts
at decarboxylation of 15 yielded only decomposition prod-
ucts. Fortuitously, while attempting the malonic radical
cyclization of 14 in methanol, ester 11 was isolated, albeit
in low yield (Scheme 3). The apparent propensity of 15 to
undergo a retro-Claisen condensation was a useful observa-
tion given our inability to effect the desired decarboxylation
reaction.
efficiently prepared via the acylation of indoline 8 with
acryloyl chloride followed by the Michael addition of
dimethylmalonate in a high yielding, operationally simple
It now became apparent that the best route to mono-ketone
1
1
6 would be via a retro-Claisen condensation of diketone
8 (Scheme 4). Indole 18 was easily prepared in four steps
3
one-pot procedure. Subjection of 9 to Mn(OAc) in refluxing
from indoline 8. Gratifyingly, fragmentation of 18 through
a retro-Claisen condensation was indeed effective producing
methyl ketone 16 in 95% yield upon treatment with sodium
bicarbonate in methanol. Conjugate addition of 16 to
acrylonitrile yielded 19 (74%), which was quantitatively
reduced to secondary alcohol 20. Dehydration of 20 to 21
was exceptionally difficult and failed to succumb to a large
number of both standard and more elaborate measures.
Preparation of the methyl xanthate followed by Chugaev
elimination provided the most satisfactory results. Hydro-
genation of 21 over Adam’s catalyst saturated both the alkene
acetic acid promoted a tandem indoline oxidation/malonic
radical cyclization producing indole 10 in 67% yield. In
8
our experience, the direct N-acryloylation of indole is low
yielding and suffers from multiple side reactions. As a result,
the synthesis of substrates such as 10 by the aromatization
of indolines, either using DDQ or the one-pot procedure
depicted in Scheme 2, is advantageous.
All attempts to sequentially reduce or otherwise function-
alize the geminal diesters of 10 were unsuccessful, in part
due to the reductive and hydrolytic lability of the indole-
amide. Fortunately, Krapcho decarboxylation under micro-
wave conditions provided the monoester 11 in 65% yield.
We were pleased to find that conjugate addition of the ester
enolate of 11 into acrylonitrile could be effected to produce
and the nitrile producing, after Boc protection, carbamate
9
2
2. The eagerly anticipated oxidation of the N-acylindole
2 was extremely facile, proceeding in 93% yield upon
2
treatment with dimethyl dioxirane, prepared in situ from
12 bearing a latent aminopropyl group in the form of a
1
0
acetone and OXONE. Although 23 was obtained as a 1:1
mixture of diastereomers, we gambled that this would prove
inconsequential given the epimerizable nature of the hemi-
aminal. The final step, amine deprotection and presumed
imine formation, gave a single compound in 82% yield.11
cyanoethyl moiety. Unfortunately, once again the labile
nature of the indole-amide functionality made elaboration
of the remaining methyl ester unfeasible.
We reasoned that the use of an analogous keto-ester might
be a more effective strategy with the methyl ketone offering
facile options for conversion to an ethyl substituent (Scheme
(
9) Ackermann, J.; Aebi, J.; Dehmlow, H.; Hirth, G.; Maerki, H.-P.;
Morand, O.; Panday, N. U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. 2005, 2005065210.
(10) (a) Curci, R.; Fiorentino, M.; Troisi, L. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45,
4758-4760. (b) Waldemar, A.; Chantu, S.-M. R.; Zhao, C.-G. Org. React.
2002, 61, 219.
(11) (a) Sakaitani, M.; Ohfune, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5543-
5546. (b) Sakaitani, M.; Ohfune, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 870-876.
(
8) For comprehensive reviews of Mn(OAc)3 chemistry see (a) Snider,
B. B. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 339-363. (b) Snider, B. B. Manganese(III)-
based oxidative free-radical cyclizations in Transition Metals for Organic
Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Beller, M., Bolm, C., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH
&
Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; Vol. 1, pp 483-490.
1438
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008