Hariharan and Palanichamy
Crystal Dimension of ZSM-5 Influences on Para Selective Disproportionation of Ethylbenzene
Table IV. Effect of time on stream on ethylbenzene conversion and
products selectivity.
high crystalline nature, large crystal dimension and high
surface area by the aid of fluoride ion precursor. This
large crystal size and high crystalline nature of the mate-
rial cause high yield to p-DEB selectivity. Previously there
were many investigation has reported for Dip-EB over
modified ZSM-5, but the present study was carried out in
the concern of crystal behaviors such as high crystallanity,
crystal size and it acid strengths for high para selectivity.
On their resulting observation, p-DEB was obtained bet-
ter catalytic yield except others. This high yield of p-DEB
was due to fast diffused on high crystalline material and
well defined crystals of low external acidity. Hence this
acid medium synthesized ZSM-5 could be applied to the
study of toluene-Dip and other alkyl aromatics.
Product selectivity (%)
Time on
stream (h−1
EB
Benzene+
ꢂ
conversion (%) p-DEB m-DEB o-DEB
others
1
2
3
4
5
6
33
33
30
29
30
27
46
46
49
51
55
58
13
13
12
12
10
9
3
2
1
2
3
2
38
38
38
35
32
31
Note: Reaction conditions: Catalyst-ZSM-5 (50); Catalyst 0.3 g; WHSV: 5.77 h−1
Temp = 628 K.
;
results are presented in Table III. The conversion decreased
with increase in WHSV. The selectivity to p-DEB is
showed a slight increase whereas that of m-DEB decreased.
Hence m-DEB was verified to occur by isomerisation of
p-DEB. Isomerization of p-DEB to m-DEB can readily
occur on the external surface acid sites, but m-DEB to
o-DEB might not be favored. It can be formed in the
channel intersections via direct electrophilic reaction of
ethyl cation with EB, but it cannot be diffused out. So,
its formation might occur certainly on the external acid
sites by electrophilic substitution. The low selectivity was
due to high probability for isomerization of p-DEB com-
pared to electrophilic substitution of EB was reported.36
Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge to Uni-
versity Grants Commissions (UGC) for financial aid to
carry out this work and DST-FIST for instrumentation
facility.
References and Notes
1. H. G. Karge, J. Ladebeck, Z. Sarbeck, Z. Sarbac, and K. Hatada,
Zeolites 2, 94 (1982).
2. H. G. Karge, K. Hatada, Y. Zhang, and R. Fiedorov, Zeolites 3, 13
(1983).
3. G. Mirth, J. Cejka, and J. A. Lercher, J. Catal. 24, 139 (1993).
4. J. Cejka, G. I. Kapustin, and B. Wichterlova, Appl. Catal. A 108, 187
Delivered by Publishing Technology to:(1P99u4r)d. ue University Libraries
The selectivity of others in the last column mainly con-
5. V. Marodinova, M. Popova, M. R. Mihalyi, G. P. Borbely, and
IP: 219.141.127.176 On: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:19:46
tained benzene.
C. Minchev, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 262, 75 (2004).
6. N. P. Rhodes and R. Rudham, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 90, 809
(1994).
7. N. P. Rhodes and R. Rudham, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 89, 255
(1993).
8. I. V. Mishin, H. K. Bayer, and H. G. Karge, Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
180, 207 (1999).
9. F. Chen, G. Coudurier, and C. Naccache, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.
49, 1387 (1989).
10. P. Wu, T. Komatsu, and T. Yashima, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.
92, 861 (1996).
11. J. A. Van Bokhoven, A. L. Roest, D. C. Koningsbererger, J. T. Miller,
and G. H. A. P. M. Nachtegaal, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 6743 (2000).
12. J. Weitkamp, S. Ernst, P. A. Jacobs, and H. G. Karge, Erdol. Kohle-
Erdgass-Petrochem. 39, 13 (1986).
13. W. Xia, B. Mei, and M. Muhler, Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2, 1
(2010).
14. M. S. Holm, S. Svellc, F. Joensen, P. Beato, C. H. Christensen,
S. Bordiga, and M. Bjorgen, Appl. Catal. A 356, 23 (2009).
15. J. Cejka, A. Vondrova, B. Wichterlova, H. G. Jerschewitz,
G. Lischke, and E. Schreier, Collec. Czech. Chem. Commun. 60, 412
(1995).
16. Y. Li, B. Xue, and X. He, Catal. Commun. 10, 702 (2009).
17. J. Gao, Lidong, J. Hu, W. Li, and J. Wang, Catal. Commun. 10, 1615
(2009).
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
3.5.3. Effect of Time on Stream
The effect of time on stream on conversion and product
selectivity was studied for 6 h at 623 K. The EB con-
version and products selectivity are presented in Table IV.
The conversion decreased with increase in time on stream
was due to coke formation. But during the initial 3 h of
time on stream the decrease in conversion was not sig-
nificant. Hence coke formation was suggested after 3 h.
The selectivity of p-DEB increased with the increase in
time on stream, but the increase was not high for the first
3 h. The enhanced selectivity towards the end of time on
stream was due to pore size reduction, as a result of coke
formation. In addition, coke formation might also block
the external acid sites completely. It was also verified by
decrease in the selectivity of m-DEB. Ethylene was also
observed for first 3 h, but after 3 h the release was not
observed. Though coke formation was noticed, the catalyst
can be reactivated and recycled for the Dip EB reaction.
18. A. Corma, G. Sastre, and P. M. Viruela, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
100, 75 (1995).
19. V. Marodinova, M. Popova, M. R. Mihalyi, G. P. Borbely, and
C. Minchev, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 262, 75 (2004).
20. N. Sharnappa, S. Pai, and V. V. Bokade, J. Nat. Gas Chem. 18, 369
(2009).
4. CONCLUSION
The shape selective Dip-EB was investigated over ZSM-
5 (50, 75 and 100) synthesized in acidic medium. This
catalyst was synthesized at pH between 4 and 6. The syn-
thesized materials were characterized by XRD, SEM, BET
and TGA techniques. The synthesized material established
21. W. W. Kaeding, J. Catal. 95, 512 (1985).
22. S. M. Csicsery, Pure and Appl. Chem. 58, 841 (1986).
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14, 2493–2500, 2014
2499