C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Scope and Limitations Using 2a
mixtures consisting of almost exclusively these latter isomers. The
mechanistic hypothesis in Scheme 2 helps rationalize the unusual
ability of 2 to convert geraniol to (E)-isogeraniol rather than to the
aldehyde, because formation of the enol isomer would require the
catalyst to form an allyl intermediate like 16-Z. Finally, we note
that, since isomerization of the longer substrates presumably occurs
by a random walk of the double bond up and down the chain en
route to the most stable isomer, the observed movement of the
double bond is actually just a lower estimate of the number of times
the catalyst acts on a substrate.
2
temp
C)
yield
(%)
entry
reactant
product
(%)
(
°
time
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1-pentene
3
5
7
(E)-2-pentene
(E, E)-4
(E)-6
8
10
14a
14b
(E)-12
14c
14d
14e
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
25
25
25
25
25
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
15 min
40 min
4 h
26 h
4 d
1 h
1 h
4 h
4 h
95
96
75
b
70:30c
d
9
61
95
97
90
84
97
e
13a
13b
11
13c
13d
13e
13f
In summary, catalyst 2 is unusual in its activity (in many cases
10
11
12
5
20
30
4 h
3.6 d
3 d
2-5 mol % is sufficient), selectivity, and unprecedented ability to
b
91
81
b
move unhindered double bonds over many positions. Ongoing
studies are designed to elucidate further the mechanism of action
and the capabilities of this bifunctional catalyst design, and these
will be reported in due course.
14f
a
1
Acetone-d6 solvent, yields determined by H NMR and internal standard
b
c
unless otherwise indicated. Isolated. Equilibrium ratio of 7 and 8, also
reached from either side within 2-4 h using 2 mol % of 2 at 70 °C.
Unreacted 9 (29%) and an unidentified isomer (10%) also present.
d
Acknowledgment. The NSF is thanked for support of this and
related work, and Dr. LeRoy Lafferty is thanked for assisting with
NMR experiments.
e
Isomerization could also be completed using 5 mol % of 2 for 1 d at
2
5 °C.
Scheme 2. Mechanistic Hypothesis
Supporting Information Available: Details of compound prepara-
tion, characterization, and use of the catalysts. This material is available
free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
(
(
(
(
1) Trost, B. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 695-705.
2) Uma, R.; Crevisy, C.; Gree, R. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 27-51.
3) Kuznik, N.; Krompiec, S. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2007, 251, 222-233.
4) Herrmann, W. A.; Prinz, M. In Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with
Organometallic Compounds, 2nd ed.; Cornils, B., Herrmann, W. A., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002; Vol. 3, pp 1119-1130.
5) Negishi, E.-I. In Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic
Synthesis; Negishi, E.-i., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2002;
Vol. 2, pp 2783-2788.
(
1
(
<2%) of (Z)-isomer are detected in 500 MHz H NMR spectra.
(
6) Suzuki, H.; Takao, T. In Ruthenium in Organic Synthesis; Murahashi,
S.-I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp 309-331.
7) Otsuka, S.; Tani, K. In Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.;
Beller, M., Bolm, C., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; Vol.
Remarkably, diallyl ether (entry 2) gave (E,E)-4 in high yield
without Claisen rearrangement of the intermediate allyl propenyl
(
ether17-19
and without any detectable (Z,E)-isomer, providing rapid
1, pp 199-209.
entry under neutral conditions to a little-explored class of com-
pounds which have typically been made as mixtures using strong
base.20
(
(
8) R u¨ ba, E.; Simanko, W.; Mauthner, K.; Soldouzi, K. M.; Slugovc, C.;
Mereiter, K.; Schmid, R.; Kirchner, K. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3843-
3850.
9) Gibson, T.; Tulich, L. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1821-1823.
Preliminary experiments are thus far consistent with the mecha-
nistic hypothesis advanced in Scheme 2. Rather surprisingly,
bubbling ethylene (∼25 equiv) into an acetone solution of 2 leads
to formation of free acetonitrile and an ethylene complex similar
to 15, rather than a chelate-opened species. Therefore, we propose
that the first step of the catalytic cycle is exchange of acetonitrile
for alkene, forming 15. The role of the basic nitrogen of the
imidazole could then be deprotonation at an allylic position, forming
(10) Iranpoor, N.; Mottaghinejad, E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 423, 399-
404.
(
11) In eq 1, isomerization to the enol requires a movement over n-1 positions,
all of which can be reasonably attributed to catalysis by metal. The final
enol-keto tautomerization may or may not involve metal catalyst but for
simplicity is included in the total count of n.
(12) The term “zipper” has also been applied to alkyne isomerization by
superstoichiometric amounts of strong bases: Brown, C. A.; Yamashita,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 891-892. Bifunctional reactivity may be
involved, but salts of simple amines also work: Abrams, S. R.; Nucciarone,
D. D.; Steck, W. F. Can. J. Chem. 1983, 61, 1073-1076.
(
(
(
13) Slugovc, C.; Rueba, E.; Schmid, R.; Kirchner, K. Organometallics 1999,
16 with an anionic allyl and a protonated heterocyclic ligand, which
18, 4230-4233.
14) Grotjahn, D. B.; Gong, Y.; Zakharov, L. N.; Golen, J. A.; Rheingold, A.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 438-453.
could then return the proton to either end of the allyl moiety and
promote isomerization. Preliminary experiments using propene
instead of ethylene show formation of 15 but no other detectable
complexes; thus, the concentration of 16 during the catalysis must
be low.
Additional compelling evidence for the role of the heterocycle
in the catalyst21 is that complex 1e is 330 times slower at
isomerizing 1-pentene than is 2 and, moreover, is 10000 times
slower at isomerizing pent-4-en-1-ol. Our mechanistic hypothesis
for high (E)-selectivity is that either the transition states (e.g., from
15) For examples of ligands we have made and tested here, see: Grotjahn,
D. B.; Incarvito, C. D.; Rheingold, A. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
4
1
0, 3884-3887. Grotjahn, D. B.; Lev, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
26, 12232-12233. Grotjahn, D. B.; Gong, Y.; DiPasquale, A. G.;
Zakharov, L. N.; Rheingold, A. L. Organometallics 2006, 25, 5693-
695.
5
(
16) See Supporting Information for details.
(17) Trost, B. M.; Zhang, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 6007-6010.
(
18) Schmidt, B. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 254, 53-57.
19) Nelson, S. G.; Bungard, C. J.; Wang, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
13000-13001.
(
(
20) Taskinen, E.; Virtanen, R. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 1443-1449.
21) Placement of the base in the catalyst is crucial: adding 1-methyl-4-tert-
butylimidazole to the 1-pentene isomerization by 1e made the reaction
even slower.
(
1
5 to allyl complex 16) or intermediates (e.g., 16) leading to (Z)-
alkene are sufficiently high in energy to leave the system shuttling
between terminal and (E)-alkene(s), creating “semi-thermodynamic”
JA073457I
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 129, NO. 31, 2007 9593