V. Ferraro, et al.
InorganicChemistryCommunications116(2020)107894
Fig. 4. Normalized PLE (violet line, λemission = 600 nm) and PL spectra (λexcitation = 375 nm) of [Cu(N^N)2]X (X = Cl, yellow line; X = BF4, dark yellow line) and
CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
the value of 74.5° found in the related [CuI(H2CPz2)2][ClO4]
(H2CPz2 = bis(pyrazol-1-yl)methane) [47] compound. In other words,
[Cu(N^N)2]+ is less planar and closer to tetrahedron regularity than the
bis(pyrazol-yl)methane compound. Accordingly, the τ4-descriptor for 4-
coordination [57] is 0.70 (extreme forms: 0.00 for square planar, 1.00
around copper atom is best described as a distorted seesaw with a N
(22)-Cu-N(42) angle of 130.87(8)° and, almost perpendicular, a N(12)-
Cu-N(52) angle of 116.99(8)°. Dihedral angle between these planes,
CuN22N42 and CuN12N52 ones, is 76.96(9)°. Fig. S4 shows the seesaw
geometry. On the other hand, the chelate angles are 92.19(8) and
92.62(8)°, only slightly lower than those found in the related bis(pyr-
azol-1-yl)methane compound, 94.1° [47]. The chelate rings adopt a
the copper atom [0.4161(10) and 0.3966(10) Å] above the best plane.
The phenyl rings are in axial position with respect to the plane, angles
of 11.37(13) and 10.98(16)° with the normal of each plane. Fig. S5
shows these features.
orbitals (HOMO, HOMO-1) and unoccupied π* orbitals localized on the
indazol-1-yl fragments (LUMO, LUMO+1, LUMO+12 and LUMO
+13), depicted for clarity in Fig. S8. Fig. 3 shows as example the su-
perposition of the HOMO-1 (green) and of the LUMO (yellow).
Solid [Cu(N^N)2]X complexes exhibit bright yellow emission upon
excitation with near-UV and violet light. The maximum of the emission
band (PL, Fig. 4) lies at 565 nm and the FWHM is 4600 cm−1. The
emission from [Cu(N^N)2]X can be obtained for excitation wavelengths
below 450 nm, as observable in the excitation (PLE) spectrum reported
in Fig. 4, with PLE maximum at 386 nm. The emission spectrum re-
and, as observable in Fig. 4, it is independent upon the nature of the
counterion. Powder and crystals of the compound show the same
photoluminescence features. The CIE 1931 chromaticity coordinates
are x = 0.437, y = 0.477, falling between the yellow and the yellowish
orange regions of the diagram in Fig. 4.
values of 12 (63%) and 73 μs (37%), respectively. The average lifetime
is 35 μs. The tenths of microseconds range indicate that triplet excited
states are involved. Biexponential decay is quite common for lumines-
cent Cu(I) complexes, recent examples being oligophosphine-thiocya-
nate derivatives [58] and PNP coordination compounds [59]. In the
the two lifetimes were assigned as the triplet decays of MLCT and LLCT
excited states [60]. For what concerns [Cu(N^N)2]+, the TD-DFT opti-
mized geometries of the first (T1) and second (T2) triplet states agree
with 3LLCT/3MLCT transitions, being the electronic structures de-
scribed by the electron transfer from Cu- and indazole-centred mole-
cular orbitals (mainly HOMO, HOMO-1 and HOMO-2) to indazole-lo-
calized unoccupied orbitals (mainly LUMO). The orbitals most involved
are depicted in Fig. 5. T1 and T2 states have quite similar geometry, as
depicted in Fig. S9, and the poor rigidity of the molecule was indicated
by NMR studies. The energy difference between the two excited states
at T2 geometry is only 470 cm−1, therefore both T1 and T2 appear
reasonably involved in the emission from the complex.
As stated in the ESI, the position of the chloride anion resulted to be
disordered and therefore it could not be modelled, so the interactions
between cation and anion could not be studied. However, the cations
are connected by means of π,π-stacking interactions between the in-
dazol-1-yl moieties. Fig. S6 shows one of them, causing the growth of
the crystal along the a axis. This π,π-interaction (symm. op. x-0.5, y,
0.5-z and x+0.5, y, 0.5-z) leaves a distance between centroids of the
benzene rings of 3.772(2) Å and a slippage of 1.021 Å. The dihedral
angle between planes is 13.70(14)°. Other interesting interactions be-
tween planes (See Fig. S7) are those formed between one indazol-1-yl
ring and its symmetrical equivalent (symm. op. 0.5-x, 0.5-y, 0.5-z),
which generates dimeric entities. The distance between centroids is
4.139(2) Å and the ring slippage is 1.181 Å. The dihedral angle between
planes is 1.7 (2)°.
[Cu(N^N)2]+ absorbs light in CH2Cl2 and DMSO solution for wa-
velengths below 410 nm. As observable in Fig. 3, the use of a co-
ordinating solvent such as DMSO changes the absorption features, being
markedly less pronounced the band centred around 329 nm. This out-
come suggests that the lowest energy absorption could be related to
charge transfer between metal centre and coordinated ligands. TD-DFT
calculations clearly indicated that the lowest energy singlet transition
has MLCT character, involving metal-centred occupied molecular
The photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) measured at room
temperature for powder samples is 1.3%. The radiative (kr) and non-
radiative (knr) rate constants are estimated on the basis of the equation
PLQY = kr/(kr + knr) = τmkr [5] to be kr = 3.7·102 s−1 and
4