3a
experiments showed that the allyl–palladium compounds are
stable under the above conditions in the absence of c-
C6H11Co(DMG)2(py).
Assuming a mechanism analogous to the above and consider-
ing the nature of the products, these reactions probably involve
initial attack of the cyclohexyl radical at the metal to form a
cyclohexyl–Pd(III) species, followed by b-hydrogen elimination
of cyclohexene to form a hydrido–allylpalladium(III) complex
[eqn. (2)]. Subsequent reductive elimination of propene could
e.g. alkenes RCHNCHCH3
and allylic acetates
RCHNCHCH2OAc,3a the chemistry involving hydrogen trans-
fer from the cyclohexyl radical would seem in effect to provide
a route for both the isomerization of the alkene or the
3
hydrogenolysis of the allylic acetate, via h -allylpalladium
compounds, to terminal alkenes RCH2CHNCH2. Both types of
reactions have potential utility, as we note that hydrogenolysis
of allylpalladium complexes by hydride sources normally
results in the formation of internal alkenes unless the source is
formate ion.10
We thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council and the Government of Ontario for financial support.
(2)
result in the palladium( ) species PdCl(PPh3), which could
I
undergo a second attack by a cyclohexyl radical to form the
palladium(II) cyclohexyl compound PdCl(C6H11)(PPh3), which
could also undergo b-hydrogen elimination of cyclohexene to
give the hydride PdHCl(PPh3).
Notes and references
1 (a) J. K. Stille, in The Chemistry of the Metal–Carbon Bond, ed. F. R.
Hartley and S. Patai, Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1985, vol. 2, ch. 9; (b)
A. Krief and A. M. Laval, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 745; (c) R. Sustmann
and R. Altevogt, Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 5167; (d) R. M. Bullock and
E. G. Samsel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 6886; (e) T. A. Shackleton,
S. C. Mackie, S. B. Fergusson, L. J. Johnston and M. C. Baird,
Organometallics, 1990, 9, 2248.
2 (a) H.-G. Schmalz, S. Siegel and A. Schwarz, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996,
37, 2947; (b) C. A. G. Carter, R. McDonald and J. M. Stryker,
Organometallics, 1999, 18, 820; (c) C. A. Merlic and D. Xu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 9855; (d) G. G. Melikyan, O. Vostrowsky, W.
Bauer, H. J. Bestmann, M. Khan and K. M. Nicholas, J. Org. Chem.,
1994, 59, 222.
Although cyclohexene is anticipated as a byproduct in these
reactions, it is expected to be formed in any case as a product of
the photolysis of c-C6H11Co(DMG)2(py)5 and we therefore
cannot take its formation as evidence for the postulated
mechanism. While neither the putative hydride PdHCl(PPh3)
nor its dimer appear to have been reported, the 1H NMR
spectrum of a reaction mixture in benzene-d6 exhibited a
resonance at d –13, indicative of a palladium hydride. This same
3
resonance is also observed in reactions involving [(h -1-
3
3
methylallyl)PdCl]2, [(h -2-methylallyl)PdCl]2, [(h -1-phenyl-
3
allyl)PdCl]2 and [(h -2-phenylallyl)PdCl]2, consistent with the
3 (a) S. A. Godleski, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M.
Trost, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, vol. 4, p. 585; (b) F. Guibe,
Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 2967.
general mechanism proposed. Also consistent is an observation
3
that
the
reaction
of
[(h -allyl)Pt(PPh3)2]Cl
with
C6H11Co(DMG)2(py) gives comparable amounts of propene
and trans-PtHCl(PPh3)2, identified by comparison of its hydride
resonance (d 215.2) with that of an authentic sample,9 in
addition to cyclohexene.
4 (a) S. G. Cohen and C. H. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1953, 75, 5504; (b)
R. R. Bridger and G. A. Russell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1963, 85, 3754; (c)
R. G. Kryger, J. P. Lorand, R. R. Stevens and N. R. Herron, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 7589; (d) R. C. Neuman and G. D. Lockyer,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 3982; (e) J. E. Leffler, An Introduction to
Free Radicals, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1993, pp. 148–150;
(f) J. E. Leffler, An Introduction to Free Radicals, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York, 1993, p. 183.
Seemingly anomalous, however, is the exclusive formation
3
of but-1-ene in the reaction of [(h -1-methylallyl)PdCl]2 and of
3
3-phenylprop-1-ene in the reaction of [(h -1-phenylal-
lyl)PdCl]2. While these products are consistent with the
reductive elimination step implied above, reductive elimination
of alkenes from allylpalladium(II) hydrido complexes normally
results in the formation of the thermodynamically preferred
internal alkenes.3b Thus the fact that the reactions discussed
here give solely terminal alkenes is perhaps evidence that the
reactions do indeed involve allylpalladium(III) hydrido species,
although it is not readily obvious why formation of the terminal
alkenes should become kinetically preferred. A better under-
standing of these processes must await further labelling and
stereochemical studies which are underway.
5 B. P. Branchaud, M. S. Meier and M. N. Maedzadeh, J. Org. Chem.,
1987, 52, 212; B. P. Branchaud and Y. L. Choi, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53,
4638; B. Giese, J. Hartung, J. He, O. Hüter and A. Koch, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1989, 28, 325.
6 (a) V. V. Grushin, Organometallics, 2000, 19, 1888; (b) D. R. Coulson,
Chem. Commun., 1968, 1530; (c) A. Mentes, R. R. W. Kemmit, G.
Fawcett and D. R. Russel, Polyhedron, 1999, 18, 1141; (d) C. Eaborn,
K. J. O’Dell and A. Pidcock, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1978,
357.
7 T. H. Colle, P. S. Glaspie and E. S. Lewis, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43,
2722; H. Lankamp, W. T. Nauta and C. MacLean, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1968, 249.
8 G. Carturan, M. Biasiolo, S. Danielle, G. A. Mazzochin and P. Ugo,
Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1986, 119, 19.
Although the mechanisms are as yet uncertain, the reactions
lead in all cases to preferential conversion of the allylic ligands
3
to terminal alkenes. Since compounds of the type [(h -
9 W. McFarlane, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1974, 324.
10 J. Tsuji and T. Mandai, Synthesis, 1996, 1.
1-RC3H4)PdCl]2 (R = alkyl, aryl) are readily prepared from,
1778
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1777–1778