Lee et al.
Platinum-Tin Nano-Catalysts Supported on Alumina for Direct Dehydrogenation of n-Butane
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
. CONCLUSIONS
Pt/Sn/Al O3 (NaOH)
2
Al O supports were prepared by a precipitation method
using various basic solutions (NaOH, KOH, NH OH,
and Na CO ꢁ, and Pt/Sn/Al O nano-catalysts were then
prepared by a sequential impregnation method for use
in the direct dehydrogenation of n-butane. The effect
of precipitation agent on the physicochemical proper-
ties and catalytic activities of Pt/Sn/Al O nano-catalysts
was investigated. All the Pt/Sn/Al O (X) nano-catalysts
2
3
Pt/Sn/Al O3 (KOH)
2
4
Pt/Sn/Al O3 (NH OH)
2
4
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
exhibited a significant deactivation during the reaction.
Yield for TDP decreased in the order of Pt/Sn/Al O
2
3
(
NaOH) > Pt/Sn/Al O (KOH) > Pt/Sn/Al O (NH OH) >
2 3 2 3 4
Pt/Sn/Al O3 (Na CO )
2
2
3
Pt/Sn/Al O (Na CO ꢁ. It was observed that yield for
2
3
2
3
1
0
20
30
40
50
60
TDP increased with increasing platinum surface area of
the catalyst. Among the catalysts tested, Pt/Sn/Al O
2
Platinum surface area (m /g)
2
3
(
NaOH) nano-catalyst with the highest platinum surface
Figure 6. A correlation between yield for TDP after a 360 min-
reaction and platinum surface area of Pt/Sn/Al O (X) (X = NaOH, KOH,
area showed the best catalytic performance in the reaction.
Thus, platinum surface area served as an important factor
determining the catalytic performance of Pt/Sn/Al O (X)
2
3
NH OH, and Na CO ) nano-catalysts.
4
2
3
2
3
in the direct dehydrogenation of n-butane.
4
87.7 eV, corresponding to zerovalent Sn (Sn(0)), alloyed
tin (Sn(0)alloyꢁ, and oxidized species of tin (Sn(II,IV)),
respectively. As shown in Figure 5, however, only two Sn
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to acknowl-
edge support from the Samsung Total Petrochemicals
Corporation.
3
d5/2 components (Sn(0)alloy and Sn(II,IV)) were observed
in the Pt/Sn/Al O (NaOH), Pt/Sn/Al O (KOH), and
2
3
2
3
Pt/Sn/Al O (NH OH) catalysts. Any peaks related to
2
3
4
References and Notes
zerovalent tin were not detected in these three catalysts.
Delivered by Publishing Technology to: Rice University, Fondren Library
1
. L. Rodriguez, D. Romero, D. Rodriguez, J. Sanchez, and
On the other hand, Pt/Sn/Al O (Na CO ꢁ showed three
2
3
IP: 46.17.238.138 On: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 05:28:04
2
3
F. Dominguez, Appl. Catal. A 373, 66 (2010).
peaks (Sn(0), Sn(0)alloy, and Sn(II,IV C) ) .o pT yh rei g ph rt e: sAe nm c ee r ioc fa n Scientific Publishers
2. S. A. Bocanegra, A. A. Castro, O. A. Scelza, and S. R. de Miguel,
zerovalent tin in the Pt/Sn/Al O (Na CO ꢁ catalyst and
2
3
2
3
Appl. Catal. A 333, 49 (2007).
the absence of zerovalent tin in the Pt/Sn/Al O (NaOH),
3. S. D. Jackson, S. Rugmini, P. C. Stair, and Z. Wu, Chem. Eng. J.
120, 127 (2006).
2
3
Pt/Sn/Al O (KOH), and Pt/Sn/Al O (NH OH) catalysts
2
3
2
3
4
4
5
. N. Kijima, M. Toba, and Y. Yoshimura, Catal. Lett. 127, 63 (2009).
. W. Liu, S. Y. Lai, H. Dai, S. Wang, H. Sun, and C. T. Au, Catal.
Today 131, 450 (2008).
were well supported by TPR results (Fig. 4). In general,
the state of Sn in the Pt–Sn catalyst strongly affects the
catalytic properties. When Sn exists as a metallic state
6
7
8
9
. M. J. Ledoux, F. Meunier, B. Heinrich, C. Pham-Huu, M. E. Harlin,
and A. O. I. Krause, Appl. Catal. A 181, 157 (1999).
. S. Veldurthi, C.-H. Shin, O.-S. Joo, and K.-D. Jung, Catal. Today
0
(
Sn ꢁ, it serves as a poison. When Sn exists as a nonmetal-
4
+
2+
lic state (Sn or Sn ꢁ, however, it acts as a promoter.
Therefore, it can be inferred that metallic tin unalloyed
with platinum in the Pt/Sn/Al O (Na CO ꢁ catalyst is
185, 88 (2012).
. M. M. Bhasin, J. H. McCain, B. V. Vora, T. Imai, and P. R. Pujado,
Appl. Catal. A 221, 397 (2001).
. S. D. Jackson and S. Rugmini, J. Catal. 251, 59 (2007).
2
3
2
3
responsible for its low catalytic activity (Figs. 2 and 3).
1
1
1
0. Y. Xu, J. Lu, M. Zhong, and J. Wang, J. Nat. Gas Chem. 18, 88
(2009).
3
.6. Correlation Between Catalytic Performance and
Pt Surface Area
1. S. A. Bocanegra, A. A. Castro, A. Guerrero-Ruiz, O. A. Scelza, and
S. R. de Miguel, Chem. Eng. J. 118, 161 (2006).
2. S. R. de Miguel, S. A. Bocanegra, I. M. J. Vilella, A. Guerrero-Ruiz,
and O. A. Scelza, Catal. Lett. 119, 5 (2007).
Figure 6 shows the correlation between platinum surface
area and catalytic performance in the direct dehydrogena-
tion of n-butane. It is interesting to note that yield for TDP
increased with increasing platinum surface area. Although
platinum surface area of the catalyst is not the sole factor
determining the catalytic performance in the direct dehy-
drogenation of n-butane, it can serve as an important corre-
lating parameter for the catalytic performance in the direct
dehydrogenation of n-butane. Among the catalysts tested,
Pt/Sn/Al O (NaOH) nano-catalyst with the highest plat-
13. S. A. Bocanegra, P. D. Zgolicz, O. A. Scelza, and S. R. de Miguel,
Catal. Commun. 10, 1463 (2009).
1
1
1
1
1
4. A. D. Ballarini, P. Zgolicz, I. M. J. Vilella, S. R. de Miguel, A. A.
Castro, and O. A. Scelza, Appl. Catal. A 381, 83 (2010).
5. J. K. Lee, H. Lee, U. G. Hong, J. Lee, Y.-J. Cho, Y. Yoo, H.-S. Jang,
and I. K. Song, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 18, 1096 (2012).
6. Y. Bang, S. J. Han, J. Yoo, J. H. Choi, J. K. Lee, J. H. Song, J. Lee,
and I. K. Song, Appl. Catal. B 148, 269 (2014).
7. J. G. Seo, M. H. Youn, D. R. park, I. Nam, and I. K. Song, Int. J.
Hydrogen Energ. 34, 8053 (2009).
8. I. H. Cho, S. B. Park, S. J. Cho, and R. Ryoo, J. Catal. 173, 295
(1998).
2
3
inum surface area showed the best catalytic performance
in the direct dehydrogenation of n-butane.
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 15, 8305–8310, 2015
8309