C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Experimental and Predicted Intramolecular 13C KIEs for
is recognizable in the curvature in the Arrhenius plot of ln KIE
versus 1/T, shown in Figure 1.
A least-squares fit to the three high-temperature points gives
the Ring-Opening of Cyclopropylcarbinyl Radical
b
predicted KIE
1
3
12
12
13
a
E
a
( C) - E
a
( C) ) 52 cal/mol and A( C)/A( C) ) 0.987. For
temp (°C)
experimental KIE
without tunneling
with tunneling
13
12
comparison, the two low-temperature points give E
a
( C) - E
85 cal/mol and A( C)/A( C) ) 0.908. Thermally activated
tunneling by the lighter isotope increases the difference in the E
a
( C)
8
2
0
2
0
1.062 ( 0.003
1.079 ( 0.002
1.085 ( 0.003
1.131 ( 0.002
1.163 ( 0.004
1.048
1.058
1.064
1.093
1.106
1.057
1.073
1.082
1.138
1.169
1
2
13
)
a
13
12
-
78
100
values between C and C, and the effect of tunneling on lowering
A values makes A( C)/A( C) , 1.0 as the importance of tunneling
for the lighter isotope increases.
-
12
13
1
6
a
Defined as [k12C/k13C(for C-4)]/[k12C/k13C(for C-3)]. Uncertainties are 95%
The extraordinarily large 13C KIEs and curvature in the Arrhenius
plot of them are observable but subtle experimental indicators of
heavy-atom tunneling. However, tunneling has a larger, if less
directly measurable effect on the outcome of the reaction. For
example, under our conditions at -100 °C, this reaction produces
confidence ranges, based on 12 measurements at 80, 22, and 0 °C, 18
measurements at -78 °C, and 6 measurements at -100 °C. The reactions
at 80, 22, and 0 °C were conducted in o-dichlorobenzene and those at -78
b
and -100 °C in methylcyclohexane. KIE predictions without and with
tunneling are based on CVT and CVT/SCT rate constants, respectively,
calculated on the UB3LYP/6-31G* potential energy surface.
6
2% of 2 plus 38% of non-ring-opened 5. Without the rate
1
0
tunneling (SCT) approximation. These calculations were carried
out on the UB3LYP/6-31G* potential energy surface using GAUSS-
acceleration provided by heavy-atom tunneling, 2 would only be
28% of the product. This example shows that a full understanding
of ordinary observations can require allowance for the role of heavy-
atom tunneling.
11
12
13
RATE as the interface between POLYRATE and Gaussian03.
As shown in Table 1, the theoretical KIEs without allowance
for tunneling drastically underpredict the size of the observed values.
The error in these predictions grows larger as the temperature
decreases, rising to as large as 6%, but the error is still substantial
at the high end of the temperature range. In contrast, the predicted
KIEs that include tunneling match well with experiment throughout
the broad temperature range, with the error never exceeding 0.7%.
The effect of tunneling on the absolute rate of the ring-opening
of unlabeled 3, calculated from the ratio of CVT versus CVT/SCT
rate constants, is a factor of 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 2.9, and 4.1 at 80, 22, 0,
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by NIH grant
GM-45617 at Texas A&M and by NSF grant CHE-0910527 at
UNT. W.T.B. also thanks the Robert A. Welch Foundation for
financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Complete descriptions and data
for experiments and calculations and complete refs 12 and 13. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
-
78, and -100 °C, respectively. With these modest calculated rate
accelerations, in this temperature range the experimental rate
constants do not unequivocally implicate heavy-atom tunneling,
(1) Sheridan, R. S. In ReViews in ReactiVe Intermediate Chemistry; Moss, R. A.,
Platz, M. S., Jones, M. J., Jr., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2007;
pp 416-458.
1
4
6
even when compared to the results of high-quality rate calculations.
(2) (a) Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1700–1701. (b) Huang,
M. J.; Wolfsberg, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4039–4040. (c) Dewar,
M. J. S.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Stewart, J. J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
4040–4041. (d) Lefebvre, R.; Moiseyev, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
An Arrhenius plot of the calculated rate constants from 128 to 395
6
K shows some modest curvature, but experimental studies over
5
052–5054. (e) Redington, R. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 10781–10794.
this broad range have not been sufficiently precise to establish the
(
(
(
3) Zuev, P. S.; Sheridan, R. S.; Albu, T. V.; Truhlar, D. G.; Hrovat, D. A.;
1
4,15
curvature that would signify heavy-atom tunneling.
Borden, W. T. Science 2003, 299, 867–870.
4) Moss, R. A.; Sauers, R. R.; Sheridan, R. S.; Zuev, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
004, 126, 10196–10197.
5) For previous uses of carbon KIEs to implicate tunneling, see: (a) Miller,
D. J.; Subramarian, R.; Saunders, W. H., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
3
519–3522. (b) Wilson, J. C.; Kallsson, I.; Saunders, W. H., Jr. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4780–4784. (c) Meyer, M. P.; DelMonte, A. J.;
Singleton, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10865–10874.
(
(
6) Datta, A.; Hrovat, D. A.; Borden, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
6
684–6685. The barrier height is about 7 kcal/mol, and a C-C distance
must only increase from 1.53 Å in 3 to 2.51 Å in 4.
7) (a) Singleton, D. A.; Szymanski, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9455–
9
1
456. (b) Singleton, D. A.; Schulmeier, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
21, 9313–9317. (c) Kelly, K. K.; Hirschi, J. S.; Singleton, D. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8382–8383. (d) Ussing, B. R.; Hang, C.; Singleton,
D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7594–7607.
(
8) (a) Buchachenko, A. L. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2507–2528. (b) Turro, N. J.;
Kraeutler, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 369–377.
(
9) Truhlar, D. G.; Garrett, B. C. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1984, 35, 159.
(
10) Fernandez-Ramos, A.; Ellingson, B. A.; Garrett, B. C.; Truhlar, D. G. In
ReViews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B., Cundari, T. R.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; Vol. 23, pp 125-232.
11) Corchado, J. C.; Chuang, Y.-Y.; Coitino, E. L.; Ellingson, B. A.; Zheng,
J.; Truhlar, D. G. GAUSSRATE, version 9.7; University of Minnesota:
Minneapolis, MN, 2007.
(
Figure 1. Arrhenius plot of the CVT, CVT + SCT, and experimental 13C
KIEs for the ring-opening of 3 from 100 to 353 K.
(12) Corchado, J. C.; et al. POLYRATE, version 9.7; University of Minnesota:
Minneapolis, MN, 2007.
(13) Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, revision D.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford,
CT, 2004.
Is it possible, then, to use the measured KIEs, in order to infer
that tunneling is important in the ring-opening of 3, without recourse
to comparing the measured KIEs to calculated? The increase in
the KIE due to tunneling grows from approximately 1% at 80 °C
to 6% at -100 °C, the latter being over a third of the total isotope
effect. As a result, the experimental KIE grows much faster than
semiclassical expectations as the temperature is decreased. This fact
(14) Newcomb, M.; Glenn, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 275.
(
15) Maillard, B.; Forrest, D.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7024–
026.
(16) At temperatures low enough that both the light and heavy isotopes cross
the reaction barrier by tunneling, the difference between their E values
decreases until it becomes zero when tunneling occurs only from the lowest
vibrational levels. As the difference in E values approaches zero, the greater
tunneling by the lighter isotope makes A( C)/A( C) > 1.0.
7
a
a
1
2
13
JA1055593
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 36, 2010 12549