4
Tetrahedron
Hydroxy-1-naphthoaldehyde afforded the desired product in
high yield (5l). A complex mixture was obtained when 1-Methyl-
1-phenylethylene and 1,1-dialkylethylene were used (5m and
5n). While the reactions were suitable both electron donating and
electron withdrawing groups, ethylenes need to possess two
benzyl groups. It is well known that phenyl group can stabilize
benzyl cation,16 and its effect may need the reaction (vide infra).
Scheme 6. The reaction of chromene 4m with ethylene 2a
A
plausible reaction mechanism for the reaction of
salicylaldehydes with disubstituted ethylenes is depicted in
Scheme 5. First, salicylaldehyde dimethylacetal 7 would be
formed by the reaction of salicylaldehyde 6 with CH(OMe)3 in
the presence of TfOH. Subsequently, o-QM is generated by
elimination of methanol from salicylaldehyde dimethylacetal 7.
o-QM would react with 1,1-disubstituted ethylene via invers-
electron-demand Diels-Alder reaction to give the cyclic product
9. On the basis of the formation of 4-alkenylchroman 5a from 4-
methoxychromane 3a under reaction conditions (Scheme 3, eq
1), it is thought that retro-Diels-Alder reaction should occurred
when the reaction temperature increased to 100 °C. Elimination
of methoxy group in the presence of TfOH afforded chromene
10. Protonation of the olefinic double bond of the chromene 10
gave intermediate 11 (path A). On the other hand,
dihydropyrylium 14 was a resonance structure of intermediate 11,
which would be directly generated from 4-methoxy chromane 9
(path B). It is suggested that 12 would be obtained via path C or
path D. 1,1-Disubstituted ethylene attacked to Intermediate 11 to
yield stable dibenzyl cation 12 (path C).17 The formation of
dihydropyrylium 14 would induce ring-opening via cleavage of
C-O single bond to produce stable dibenzyl cation intermediate,
which would react with 1,1-disubstituted ethylene via inverse-
electron-demand Diels-Alder reaction to afford 12 (path D).18
Finally, the loss of a proton from 12 then furnished the desired
product 13. When the reaction of chromene 4m with ethylene 2a
was carried out, the staring material 4m was consumed. But the
complex mixture was generated, and no trace of chromane 5l was
detected (Scheme 6). Based on the result, path B and path C or
path D may be more probable than path A. The scope and
mechanism are currently under investigation and will be reported
in due course.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed the temperature-controlled
divergent synthesis of 4-alkoxy- or 4-alkenyl-chromanes via
inverse electron-demand cycloaddition with in situ generated
ortho-quinone methides in the presence of Brønsted acid catalyst.
While, at room temperature, the reaction generated 4-
methoxychromanes, the reaction at 100 ºC gave 4-
alkenylchromanes. The salicylaldehydes having electron
withdrawing groups were well-tolerated. In addition, 5-methoxy
salicylaldehyde was good suitable in these reaction conditions.
Ethylene bearing electron donating group afforded the desired
products in good yield. The strategy exhibits a new method
giving carbon-carbon or carbon-oxygen bond by controlling the
reaction temperature. The present reaction provides versatile
access to functionalized 4-substituted chromanes that would be a
useful tool for the synthesis of natural product and biologically
active molecules.
References and notes
1.
(a) Rao, W.; Yin, X.; Shi, B. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 3758-3761.
Other catalyst-controlled reactions, see: (b) Bai, J.-F.; Sasagawa,
H.; Yurino, T.; Kano, T.; Maruoka, K. Chem. Comm. 2017, 53,
8203-8206. (c) Feng, J.-J.; Lin, T.-Y.; Zhu, C.-Z.; Wang, H.; Wu,
H.-H.; Zhang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2178-2181. (d) Li,
M.; Gonzalez-Esguevillas, M.; Berritt, S.; Yang, X.; Bellomo, A.;
Walsh, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2825-2829. (e) Jin,
L.-K.; Wan, L.; Feng, J.; Cai, C. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4726-4729.
(f) Gao, W.-C.; Hu, F.; Tian, J.; Li, X.; Wei, W.-L.; Chang, H.-H.
Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 13097-13100.
2.
3.
4.
(a) Hua, M.-Q.; Wang, W.; Liu, W.-H.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Q.;
Huang, Y.; Zhu, W.-H. J. Fluor. Chem. 2016, 181, 22-29. Other
solvent-controlled synthesis, see: (b) Ye, Y.; Zheng, C.; Fan, R.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3156-3159. (c) Rossi, E.; Abbiati, G.;
Attanasi, O. A.; Rizzato, S.; Santeusanio, S. Tetrahedron, 2007,
63, 11055-11065.
(a) Chen, K.; Zhu, Z.-Z.; Liu, J.-X.; Tang, X.-Y.; Wei, Y.; Shi, M.
Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 350-353. Other substrate-controlled
syntheses, see: (b) Luo, K.; Zhang, L.; Ma, J.; Sha, Q.; Wu, L. J.
Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6978-6985. (c) Manna, M. K.; Hossian, A.;
Jana, R. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 672-675. (d) Lin, C.; Shen, Y.;
Huang, B.; Liu, Y.; Cui, S. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 3950-3956.
(a) Wang, J.-L.; Li, H.-J.; Wang, H.-S.; Wu, Y.-C. Org. Lett.
2017, 19, 3811-3814. Other loading-controlled synthesis;(b) Xin,
X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, R.; Liang, Y.; Han, F.; Dong, D.
Org. Bio. Chem. 2014, 12, 5477-5483.
5.
6.
Rouf, A.; Sahin, E.; Tanyeli, C. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 331-337.
Yang, W.; Wang, J.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, X. J. Org. Chem.
2016, 81, 1675-1680.
7.
8.
9.
Naresh, P.; Radha K. P.; Lakshmi, P. Y. Synth. Commun. 2017,
47, 1239-1249.
Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhan, Z.; Ma, X.; Nie, R.; Hai. L.; Wu, Y.
RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 2870-2874.
(a) Bai, W.-J.; David, J. G.; Feng, Z.-G.; Weaver, M. G.; Wu, K.-
L.; Pettus, T. R. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 3655-3664. (b)
Jaworski, A. A.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 10145-
10153. (c) Pathak, T. P.; Sigman, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76,
9210-9215. (d) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Parisse, C.;
Carvalho, P.; Rao, T. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2999-3002.
Scheme 5. The proposal reaction mechanism
10. Jaworski, A. A.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 10145-
10153.