Catalysis Science & Technology
Paper
References
1
2
3
4
D. Taher, M. E. Thibault, D. Di Mondo, M. Jennings and
M. Schlaf, Chem. – Eur. J., 2009, 15, 10132–10143.
T. M. Che, Celanese Corporation, United States Pat. US4642394 A,
1
985.
T. Coskun, C. M. Conifer, L. C. Stevenson and G. J. P. Britovsek,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2013, 19, 6840–6844.
J. Ni, L. He, Y. Liu, Y. Cao, H. He and K. Fan, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 812–814.
5
6
D. T. Johnson and K. A. Taconi, Environ. Prog., 2007, 26, 338–348.
Lyondell, Data Review and Assessment for Allyl Alcohol, 2005.
Fig. 8 Effect of the addition of acetic and propanoic acids on glycerol
conversion and allyl alcohol yield as a function of time on stream over
supported alumina iron catalysts. ( ) No additives, ( ) propanoic acid/
glycerol molar ratio: 1.14 : 1, ( ) acetic acid/glycerol molar ratio: 1.14 : 1.
Temperature: 340 °C. Reactants: 22.8 wt% acetic acid, 28.1 wt% propanoic
7 G. Sánchez, J. Friggieri, C. Keast, M. Drewery, B. Z. Dlugogorski,
E. Kennedy and M. Stockenhuber, Appl. Catal., B, 2014,
1
52–153, 117–128.
8
9
Y. Liu, H. Tüysüz, C.-J. Jia, M. Schwickardi, R. Rinaldi,
A.-H. Lu, W. Schmidt and F. Schüth, Chem. Commun., 2010,
−1
acid, 35 wt% glycerol. GHSV: 1190 h .
4
6, 1238–1240.
A. Konaka, T. Tago, T. Yoshikawa, A. Nakamura and
1
-acetate in the liquid phase, as confirmed by GC-MS. How-
T. Masuda, Appl. Catal., B, 2014, 146, 267–273.
0 X. Wang, X. Li, J. Xue, Y. Zhao and Y. Zhang, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2009, 50, 413–415.
ever the addition of acetic acid did not promote allyl alcohol
formation nor did it appear to influence catalyst deactivation
1
1
1
1
(Fig. 8). These results are in agreement with the work of other
1 G. Busca, L. Lietti, G. Ramis and F. Berti, Appl. Catal., B,
authors when introducing acetic acid (20 wt%) to a 30 wt%
1
998, 18, 1–36.
2 M. Guerrero-Pérez and M. Bañares, ChemSusChem, 2008, 1,
11–513.
glycerol solution at 350 °C and atmospheric pressure over an
9
zirconia–iron oxide catalyst. The presence of propanoic acid
5
in the feed did not produce a significant change in the rate
of allyl alcohol formation, as shown in Fig. 8. The observed
effect for both acetic and propanoic acids can be explained
by the decomposition of carboxylates formed on metal sur-
faces at the reaction temperature (340 °C). Whereas formate
decomposed primarily into a reductive species (carbon mon-
oxide), ketene and acrolein were the main products observed
in the decomposition of acetic acid and propionic acid at ele-
3 V. Calvino-Casilda, M. O. Guerrero-Perez and M. A. Banares,
Green Chem., 2009, 11, 939–941.
4 Y. Zhang, T. Ma and J. Zhao, J. Catal., 2014, 313, 92–103.
5 M. Ernst, B. W. Hoffer and J.-P. Melder, BASF SE, United
States Pat. US 2010/0240894 A1, 2010.
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 H. Kimura and K. Tsuto, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 1993, 70,
1
027–1030.
7 J. Higgins, X. Zhou, R. Liu and T. T. S. Huang, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 1997, 101, 2702–2708.
8 M. A. Haleem and P. E. Yankwich, J. Phys. Chem., 1965, 69,
3
8
vated temperatures. Therefore, a reductive process was not
observed with propanoic and acetic acids, in turn providing
further evidence for involvement of this route in the conver-
sion of glycerol to allyl alcohol using oxalic and formic acids.
1
729–1731.
9 I. V. Gruzin, A. F. Alksnis and Y. A. Surna, Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R.,
975, 17, 1887–1891.
1
Conclusions
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0 L. W. Clark, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77, 6191–6192.
1 F. D. Chattaway, J. Chem. Soc., Trans., 1914, 105, 151–156.
2 F. D. Chattaway, J. Chem. Soc., Trans., 1915, 107, 407–410.
3 S. Coffey and C. F. Ward, J. Chem. Soc., 1921, 1301–1306.
4 O. Kamm and C. S. Marvel, Org. Synth., 1921, 1, 15.
5 O. Kamm and C. S. Marvel, Org. Synth., 1941, 1, 42.
6 H. W. Gibson, Chem. Rev., 1969, 69, 673–692.
7 K. Saito, T. Kakumoto, Y. Nakanishi and A. Imamura,
J. Phys. Chem., 1985, 89, 3109–3113.
8 E. Arceo, P. Marsden, R. G. Bergman and J. A. Ellman, Chem.
The effect of additives on the yield of allyl alcohol from glycerol
is dependent on the concentration of the reducing agent.
While an increase of 100% in the yield of allyl alcohol was
obtained with an oxalic acid to glycerol ratio as low as 0.14 : 1,
similar results were observed with a formic acid to glycerol
ratio of 1.90 : 1. Enhancement of allyl alcohol yield concurred
with an increase in the rate of formation of carbon dioxide and
a decrease in the yield of hydroxyacetone. Both results are evi-
dence of a reductive process where an oxygen atom is removed
from the feed to form a reduced species and carbon dioxide.
2
2
3
Commun., 2009, 3357–3359.
9 A. Fischer, T. Mallat and A. Baiker, Catal. Today, 1997, 37,
1
67–189.
Acknowledgements
0 M. R. Nimlos, S. J. Blanksby, X. Qian, M. E. Himmel and
GS thanks the University of Newcastle for a post graduate
research scholarship. Funding by African Explosives Ltd. is
gratefully acknowledged.
D. K. Johnson, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2006, 110, 6145–6156.
31 W. Suprun, M. Lutecki, T. Haber and H. Papp, J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem., 2009, 309, 71–78.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 3090–3098 | 3097