Inorganic Chemistry
Article
2F7/2 transitions in the emission spectra (Figure 3, right).
Different splitting patterns in the emission spectra are a result
of different coordination environments around the metal ion,
due to the different ligand binding.17 The excitation spectra
(Figures 2B and 3 left) closely resemble the absorption spectra
of the ligands (Figure S22), indicating that the ligands sensitize
the metal-centered emission.
The excited state lifetimes (τ) and emission efficiencies
(ΦELu) of the complexes are summarized in Table 1. The τ
values of 1.464 ms for [Eu(CPAD)3]3− and 1.702 ms for
[Eu(CPAP)(DMSO)2]− were measured in DMSO. In water/
DMSO (9:1), the latter complex shows an emission lifetime of
382 μs, consistent with exchange of the coordinated DMSO
molecules for water (vide infra). The long excited state
lifetimes are accompanied by high intrinsic quantum yields
Eu
Eu
(Φ ) in DMSO and a lower value for the complex in water.
ΦELu values of 31.7%, 35.8%, and 2.7% were observed for
[Eu(CPAD)3]3−, [Eu(CPAP)(DMSO)2]−, and [Eu(CPAP)-
(H2O)2]−, respectively. Compared with Cs3[Eu(dpa)3] (dpa =
dipicolinato) in DMSO (Table S1), the lower emission
efficiencies are consistent with an increase in the donor−
acceptor distances RL (Table 1)61 and quenching caused by
O−H vibrational coupling in the case of [Eu(CPAP)(H2O)2]−
(vide infra). The favorable energies of S and T states of the
ligands result in high ηsens for the EuIII complexes (Table 1).
ΦLYb values of 0.75% and 0.028% were observed for
[Yb(CPAP)(DMSO)2]− and [Yb(CPAP)(H2O)2]−, respec-
tively (Table 1). These values are similar to related
dipicolinato-based complexes and compare favorably with
known compounds.45,47,48,67,68 The emission lifetimes for the
[Yb(CPAP)(L)2]− complex (L = H2O or DMSO) show a
similar behavior. The τ is longer for L = DMSO at 8.91 μs than
for L = H2O at 0.52 μs, as is to be expected due to quenching
through the O−H oscillators.
Figure 1. (A) Energy level diagram illustrating the antenna effect for
LnIII. 2PA and 1PA, the two- and one-photon absorption, respectively;
F, fluorescence; P, phosphorescence; ISC, intersystem crossing; ET,
energy transfer; BT, back transfer; L, luminescence; NR, nonradiative
pathways; S and T, states with singlet and with triplet multiplicity,
respectively. (B) Molecules studied in this work.
and co-workers. Their YbIII porphyrinato complexes with a
̈
Klaui ligand displayed emission lifetimes τ that varied by a
factor of ∼2.8 in the viscosity range of 0.52−1200 cP.59 Since
viscosity alters the population of intramolecular charge transfer
states, molecules with such states should provide a unique
opportunity to sense it.60
De Bettencourt-Dias and co-workers reported a carbazole-
substituted dipicolinato as sensitizer of EuIII and TbIII
emission.61,62 Carbazole is known for its 2PA properties.63−65
Thus, with the goal of increasing our knowledge of 2PA-
sensitized LnIII emission and expanding the availability of LnIII-
based viscosity sensors, we isolated two new carbazole-based
ligands with potential CT states,50,62 CPAD2− (4-((4-(9H-
carbazol-9-yl)phenyl)ethynyl)pyridine-2,6,dicarboxylate) and
CPAP4− (2,2′-(4-((4-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)phenyl)(pyridine-2,6-
diyl)bis(methylene)dimalonate) and their LnIII complexes
(LnIII = EuIII, GdIII, and YbIII).
In the case of the LnIII complexes with the ligand CPAP4−, a
decrease in the emission efficiency and lower τ in TRIS/HCl
buffered aqueous system (pH ∼ 7.4, 10% DMSO), compared
with the DMSO solution, are observed. This decrease is a
result of the nonradiative deactivation of the LnIII excited state
by the O−H vibrations of coordinated water molecules. The
presence of two coordinated water molecules q was confirmed
for the EuIII complex by comparing τ in water (τH2O) and D2O
(τD2O) (eq S5 and Table 1).
Two-Photon Spectroscopy Studies of the K3[Ln-
(CPAD)3] and K[Ln(CPAP)(L)2] (Ln = EuIII or YbIII and L
= DMSO or H2O) Complexes. All EuIII complexes can be
excited with a wide range of low energy photons in a 2PA
process (Figure S32). By exciting at 720 or 750 nm, with the
latter chosen for comparison with the 2PA standard rhodamine
B,69 the characteristic metal-centered emission pattern is
observed (Figures 2B and S29a−S31a). The quadratic
dependence of the emission intensity I on the laser power P
(Figures 2C and S29b−S31b, Tables 2 and S2) confirmed the
2PA process. The emission spectra obtained by one- or two-
photon excitation are the same (Figures 2 and S29−S31),
indicating that the same excited states are involved in the
process.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
Synthesis and Characterization of the H2CPAD and
H4CPAP Ligands and of the LnIII Complexes. H2CPAD
and H4CPAP (Figure 2A) were synthesized through modified
literature procedures (Scheme S1) and characterized using
The LnIII (LnIII = EuIII, GdIII, YbIII) complexes were obtained
as yellow solids in ∼70% yield by reacting LnCl3 with K2CPAD
in a 1:3 metal-to-ligand ratio and with K4CPAD in a 1:1 metal-
to-ligand ratio in water/DMF (1:20). They were characterized
One-Photon Spectroscopy Studies of the K3[Ln-
(CPAD)3] and K[Ln(CPAP)(L)2] (Ln = EuIII or YbIII and L
= DMSO or H2O) Complexes. K3[Ln(CPAD)3] and
K[Ln(CPAP)(L)2] (Ln = EuIII or YbIII and L = DMSO or
The two-photon absorption cross sections (σ2PA) are
summarized in Table 2. A value of 857 GM was obtained
for K3[Eu(CPAD)3]. This is among the highest reported for
EuIII complexes in solution, such as 775 GM for [NBu4]3[Eu-
(dpa5)3] described by Maury, Andraud, and co-workers.45
H2O) in solution display the characteristic EuIII-centered D0
5
→ 7FJ (J = 0−4) (Figure 2A, right) and YbIII-centered 2F5/2
→
B
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX