Please do not adjust margins
Green Chemistry
DOI: 10.1039/C7GC00473G
ARTICLE
Journal Name
not differ considerably from one spectrum to another, being
always in the expected range of 2 eV.
Acknowledgements.
Financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and
Competitiveness (Severo Ochoa, Grapas and CTQ2015-69153-
CO2-R1) and Generalitat Valenciana (Prometeo 2013-014) is
gratefully acknowledged. Prof. Simona M. Coman kindly
acknowledges UEFISCDI for financial support (project PN-II-PT-
PCCA-2013-4-1090, Nr. 44/2014). Cristina Bucur thanks Core
Programme, Project PN-480103/2016.
2
CO -TPD measurements were carried out using the AutoChem
II 2920 station. The samples (30-50 mg) were placed in a U-
shaped quartz reactor of an inner diameter of 0.5 cm and,
o
then, they were pre-treated at 100 C for 1 h with high purity
He (Purity 5.0, from Linde), and then exposed to a flow of CO
from SIAD) for 1 h. After that, the samples were flushed with
2
(
-1
o
a flow of He (50 mL min ) for 20 min at 25 C in order to
remove the weakly adsorbed CO species. TPD measurements
were then carried out heating at a rate of 10 C min till
2
o
-1
o
7
00 C. The CO
using a calibration curve. The results are expressed as mmoles
of CO per gram of catalyst.
2
desorbed was quantified with a TC detector
Notes and References
2
1
.
D. M. Alonso, S. G. Wettstein and J. A. Dumesic, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 8075.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were
conducted in the tap mode in air at ambient temperature
using a Veeco AFM apparatus. AFM images were taken for
samples exposed to ambient dust.
2
3
.
.
F. Cherubini, Energy Convers. Manage., 2010, 51, 1412.
C. H. Christensen, J. Rass-Hansen, C. C. Marsden, E.
Taarning and K. Egeblad, ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 283.
J. P. Lange, Biofuel. Bioprod. Bior., 2007, 1, 39.
A. Corma, S. Iborra and A. Velty, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
2411.
TEM images were recorded in a JEOL JEM 2100F operated at
4
.
an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Samples were prepared by 5.
applying one drop of the suspended material in ethanol onto a
carbon-coated copper TEM grid, and allowing them to dry at 6.
M. J. Climent, A. Corma and S. Iborra, Green Chem., 2011,
1
3, 520.
room temperature.
7
.
A. B. Bjerre, A. B. Olesen, T. Fernqvist, A. Ploger and A. S.
Schmidt, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1996, 49, 568.
Catalytic wet oxidation of glucose.
8.
H. B. Klinke, B. K. Ahring, A. S. Schmidt and A. B. Thomsen,
Bioresour. Technol., 2002, 82, 15.
A. S. Schmidt and A. B. Thomsen, Bioresour. Technol.,
Reactions were carried out in batch mode according to the
following procedure: 25 mg of the corresponding G catalyst
were added to a solution of 90 mg (0.5 mmols) glucose in 10
mL water. After closing, the Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor
9
1
.
1
998, 64, 139.
P. R. Gogate and A. B. Pandit, Adv. Environ. Res., 2004, 8,
01.
0.
5
was pressured at 10-18 bars with molecular oxygen and 11.
heated up to 160-180 °C, under stirring (1200 rpm), for 1-20 h.
After reaction, the pressure was released, the catalyst was 12.
V. S. Mishra, V. V. Mahajani and J. B. Joshi, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 1995, 34, 2.
J. Zakzeski, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, A. L. Jongerius and B. M.
Weckhuysen, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3552.
recovered by centrifugation and liquid phase was
1
1
1
1
3.
4.
5.
6.
I. Podolean, C. Rizescu, C. Bala, L. Rotariu, V. I. Parvulescu,
S. M. Coman and H. Garcia, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, 2307.
C. C. Huang, C. Li and G. Q. Shi, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012,
concentrated by removing water under reduced vacuum. The
reaction mixture was silylated, diluted with 1 mL of toluene
and analyzed by GC-FID chromatography (GC-Shimadzu
apparatus). Product identification was made by comparison
with authentic samples and by using a GC-MS Carlo Erba
Instruments QMD 1000 equipped with a Factor Four VF-5HT
column.
5
, 8848.
S. Navalon, A. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. Alvaro and H.
Garcia, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 6179.
D. S. Su, S. Perathoner and G. Centi, Chem. Rev., 2013,
1
13, 5782.
The recovered catalyst was dispersed in distilled water and 17.
centrifuged three times, then, dried at ambient temperature
A. Dhakshinamoorthy, A. Primo, P. Concepcion, M. Alvaro
and H. Garcia, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19, 7547.
and used in a consecutive reaction of glucose.
18.
H. Huang, J. Huang, Y. M. Liu, H. Y. He, Y. Cao and K. N.
Fan, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 930.
Large scale preparation of succinic acid: in a 300 mL Parr
1
2
2
2
9.
0.
1.
2.
X. H. Li, J. S. Chen, X. C. Wang, J. H. Sun and M. Antonietti,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 8074.
Instrument reactor equipped with
a pressure gauge,
temperature sensor and mechanical stirrer, 0.25 g of NH
2
-
H. Q. Sun, Y. X. Wang, S. Z. Liu, L. Ge, L. Wang, Z. H. Zhu
and S. B. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 9914.
J. H. Yang, G. Sun, Y. J. Gao, H. B. Zhao, P. Tang, J. Tan, A.
H. Lu and D. Ma, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 793.
R. P. Rocha, A. G. Goncalves, L. M. Pastrana-Martinez, B.
C. Bordoni, O. Soares, J. J. M. Orfao, J. L. Faria, J. L.
Figueiredo, A. M. T. Silva and M. F. R. Pereira, Catal.
Today, 2015, 249, 192.
rGO(3.8) catalyst was added to a solution of 0.9 g (5 mmols) of
glucose in 100 mL water. The reactor was pressurised at 18
bars with O
stirring for 20 h. After reaction, the Parr reactor was cooled
down to room temperature, the molecular O released, the
catalyst separated by centrifugation, water removed and
.85 g of a white solid recovered. GC-MS and GC-FID analysis
revealed a total transformation of glucose and a selectivity of 23.
2
and temperature was increased at 160 °C, under
2
0
Y. X. Wang, Y. B. Xie, H. Q. Sun, J. D. Xiao, H. B. Cao and S.
B. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 9710.
67 % in SA.
6
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins