T.H. Kang et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 396 (2015) 282–289
283
◦
pore volume, and excellent acid property [15–17]. Gas-phase dehy-
to 50 C, pyridine vapor (20 ml) was pulsed into the reactor with a
stream of He (40 ml/min) until the acid sites were saturated with
pyridine. The reactor was then evacuated at 50 C for 1 h. Brønsted
dration of glycerin to acrolein was carried out over H PW12O40
catalysts supported on silica-alumina (SA-X (X = 0, 15, 30, 50, 70,
3
◦
8
5, and 100)) with different SiO2 content (X, mol%). The prepared
acidity and Lewis acidity were determined from IR spectra of
31
◦
catalysts were characterized by ICP-AES, FT-IR, XRD, P MAS NMR,
and nitrogen adsorption–desorption analyses. Pyridine-adsorbed
in situ FT-IR spectroscopy analyses were conducted to examine
pyridine-adsorbed catalysts at 50 C within spectral range of
−
1
1600–1400 cm
.
the acid properties of H PW12O40/SA-X catalysts. 27Al NMR mea-
3
2.3. Gas-phase dehydration of glycerin
surements were also conducted to elucidate the acid properties of
H PW12O40/SA-X (X = 15, 30, 50, 70, and 85) catalysts. The effect
Gas-phase dehydration of glycerin was carried out in a con-
tinuous flow fixed-bed reactor under atmospheric pressure. Each
catalyst (0.1 g) was charged into a tubular pyrex reactor. The reac-
tor was preheated with a stream of nitrogen carrier gas (30 ml/min)
3
of support composition on the catalytic performance in the dehy-
dration of glycerin was investigated. A correlation between acid
property and yield for acrolein was then established and discussed.
◦
at 275 C for 0.5 h to achieve steady-state operation. Glycerin feed
(
7 mol% aqueous solution, 0.042 mol/h) was sufficiently vaporized
2
. Experimental
by passing through a pre-heating zone, and it was continuously fed
into the reactor together with a stream of nitrogen (30 ml/min). The
reaction was carried out at 275 C for 10 h. The reaction products
2.1. Preparation of catalysts
◦
were analyzed using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame
ionization detector (Younglin, YL6100 GC) and a capillary column
A series of silica-alumina supports with different SiO2 content
were prepared by a sol–gel method [10]. Tetraethyl orthosilicate
TEOS, Sigma–Aldrich) was dissolved in distilled water, and pH of
(
Agilent, DB-5MS, 60 m × 0.32 mm). 1,4-Dioxane was used as an
(
internal standard for quantitative calculation. Conversion of glyc-
erin, selectivity for product, and yield for product were calculated
according to the following equations.
the solution was adjusted to 2.0 with nitric acid. The TEOS solution
◦
was vigorously stirred at 40 C for 1 h. Aluminum nitrate nonahy-
drates (Al(NO ) ·9H O, Junsei Chem.) was separately dissolved in
3
3
2
distilled water, and the solution was then added into the TEOS solu-
Conversion of glycerin (%)
◦
tion. The mixed solution was stirred at 40 C for 1 h. Ammonium
mole of glycerin inlet − mole of glycerin outlet
hydroxide solution (NH OH, Sigma–Aldrich) was added into the
4
=
× 100
× 100
(1)
mole of glycerin inlet
mixed solution at a constant rate to form a hydrogel at pH 8.5.
◦
The hydrogel was further aged at 40 C for 1 h, and subsequently,
◦
it was filtered, washed, and dried at 100 C for 10 h. The result-
ing white solid was finally calcined at 550 C for 3 h. The prepared
Selectivity for product (%)
mole of product outlet
◦
silica-alumina supports were denoted as SA-X (X = 15, 30, 50, 70,
=
(2)
(3)
and 85), where X represented SiO content (mol%) in silica-alumina.
mole of glycerin inlet − mole of glycerin outlet
2
Pure alumina (SA-0) and silica (SA-100) supports were also pre-
pared by the similar methods described above. H PW12O40/SA-X
3
mole of product outlet
catalysts were prepared by an impregnation method using an aque-
Yield for product (%) =
× 100
mole of glycerin inlet
. Results and discussion
.1. Characterization of catalysts
Fig. 1 shows the FT-IR spectra of H PW12O40/SA-X (X = 0,
ous solution of tungstophosphoricacid (H PW12O40). Content of
3
H PW12O40 in all the supported catalysts was fixed at 10.0 wt%. The
3
3
◦
impregnated solid catalysts were dried at 80 C for 10 h, and then
◦
they were calcined at 300 C for 3 h. The prepared catalysts were
3
denoted as H PW12O40/SA-X (X = 0, 15, 30, 50, 70, 85, and 100).
3
3
2.2. Characterization of catalysts
15, 30, 50, 70, 85, and 100) catalysts. H3PW12O40/SA-0 exhib-
−
1
ited broad bands within the range of 1250–700 cm
, cor-
Infrared spectra of H PW12O40/SA-X catalysts were obtained
responding to the disordered metastable spinel structure of
3
using a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer (Thermo
Scientific, Nicolet 6700) with a diffuse reflectance accessory. Chem-
ical compositions of the catalysts were determined by inductively
coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) analyses
(
Shimadzu, ICP-1000IV). Nitrogen adsorption–desorption experi-
ments (BEL Japan, BELSORP-mini II) were conducted to examine the
textural properties, and pore size distributions were determined by
BJH (Barret–Joyner–Hallender) method. X-ray diffractograms were
obtained (Rigaku, D-MAX2500-PC) using Cu-K␣ radiation operated
at 50 kV and 100 mA. Structural state of H PW12O40 was confirmed
3
31
by P magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS
NMR) spectroscopy analyses (Bruker, AVANCE 400 WB). Aluminum
coordination state was examined by a 400-MHz solid state 27Al
nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer (Bruker, AVANCE
4
00 WB) at frequencies of 104.3 MHz.
Acid properties of H PW12O40/SA-X catalysts were determined
3
by pyridine-adsorbed in situ FT-IR spectroscopy measurements.
Each catalyst (0.03 g) was pressed into a pellet with a radius of
◦
0
.65 cm. The pellet was preheated at 300 C for 1 h with a stream of
He (40 ml/min) in a tubular quartz reactor. After cooling the pellet
Fig. 1. FT-IR spectra of H3PW12O40/SA-X (X = 0, 15, 30, 50, 70, 85, and 100) catalysts.