2
60
K. M. Kerry Yu, S. C. Tsang
result in higher apparent catalytic activity. Here we report a
preliminary study of the effect of including an amine
additive for the above reaction. We have also investigated
the effects of the inclusion of various chemical species
under different conditions in order to acquire some
understanding of the reaction mechanism, which may lead
to rational design of optimised catalyst, reactor and
experimental conditions for this new reaction. Our initial
findings are detailed below.
Table 1 The average compositions (Al, Cu and Zn) of the copper
zinc oxide catalysis after a detailed EDX analysis with 5 randomly
selected areas after taking the ZAF correction into account
Al/atomic % Cu/atomic % Zn/atomic %
Site of Interest 1
Site of Interest 2
Site of Interest 3
Site of Interest 4
Site of Interest 5
Average atomic %
Standard Deviation
16.13
14.07
16.11
13.69
15.22
15.04
1.13
22.77
25.41
20.79
25.25
23.10
23.46
1.92
14.06
15.59
12.89
15.41
14.72
14.53
1.10
2
Experimental
Copper zinc oxide catalyst was prepared by a co-precipi-
tation method. Typically, 3.03 g of Cu(NO ) ꢀ2.5H O,
temperature (150 °C). The extent of the reaction was fol-
lowed once hydrogen was charged into the reactor. Product
gases in the autoclave were carefully released from a gas
port and directed to an online GC via a heated (*140 °C)
gas transfer line for gas phase analysis. Generally, the line
was adequately flushed out prior to sample injection. After
the injection was performed, nitrogen was allowed to flush
the heated transfer line in preparation for the next injection.
Also, 3 9 60 mL gas samples were collected before and
after testing for injection into an off-line GC equipped with
a TCD to provide an independent analysis. Following
reaction, the pressure in the autoclave reactor was slowly
released after it was cooled in a dry ice-acetone mixture (-
75 °C). Off-line GC–MS was also used to verify the
chemical composition of the condensable products, and
showed that only methyl formate was the main condens-
able product. Quantitative analysis of the methyl formate in
3
2
2
2
.40 g of Zn(NO ) and 3.15 g of Al(NO ) ꢀ9H O were
3
2
3 2
2
dissolved in 500 mL water. The solution was stirred,
heated to 80 °C in a round bottom flask fitted with a con-
denser and equilibrated with 20 mL/min air flowing
through the flask for 5 min. An aqueous solution of
Na CO (15 g in 200 mL water) was added to the contin-
2
3
uously stirred solution until pH 7.0 was attained. At this
stage, air was passed through the solution and the precip-
itate was allowed to age for two hours while the pH was
maintained constant at 7.0. After aging, the precipitate was
recovered by filtration and washed with 50 mL of hot
double DI water (* 80 °C) 10 times prior to being dried at
1
20 °C in air for 16 h followed by calcination at 350 °C in
air for 12 h. Selected area energy dispersive x-ray (EDX)
analysis indicated the absence of significant levels of
?
residual of Na in the product. Pre-reduction of the
1
material was undertaken in a temperature programmed
furnace which was ramped from room temperature up to
the condensate after the reaction was carried out by H-
NMR.
2
2
50 °C at 5 °C/min and held at 250 °C for 2 h under a
It was necessary to perform pre-calibrations for both gas
1
(by GC-FID) and liquid (by H-NMR) separately. For this,
0 mL/min flow of 10% H /N . The resulting catalyst was
2
2
retained in the sample tube under the 10% H /N atmo-
2
a series of known concentrations of methyl formate in
2
sphere. BET surface area analysis was performed using
isothermal adsorption of N2 at -196 °C. The reduced
copper zinc oxide catalyst was found to have a specific
reaction mixture were used (methanol, amine, H
and CO
2 2
using CH as the internal standard). For the gas analysis,
4
analysis of the gas-phase was performed five times by GC-
FID at the reaction temperature before the reactor was
cooled down by dry ice-acetone prior to discharge of the
gas. Subsequently, liquid sampling was conducted at 0 °C
where 1.20 mL of the liquid sample was mixed with
2
surface area of 67 m /g. Elemental analysis of the material
after reduction was performed by EDX analysis where a
atomic ratio of Al:Cu:Zn = 1.0:1.6:1.0 was found as
summarized in Table 1. This generally matches the ratio of
the starting precursor salts added.
0.80 mL 99.8% CDCl (with 0.2% CHCl as the external
3 3
1
Catalyst testing was carried out in a 100 mL stainless
steel Parr autoclave reactor. Typically, 0.20 g of catalyst
and 10 mL methanol (with and without amine additive)
were placed in the reactor, which was then sealed. The
reactor was then flushed with pure methane. This gas was
used as the internal standard (1 bar above atmosphere
pressure). Dried CO2 and then H2 were then pumped
accordingly into the autoclave reactor to reach their desired
pressure (total pressure = 160 bar) at the reaction
standard) as the solvent for the H-NMR analysis. As a
result, the data obtained from gas phase GC-FID analysis
can be combined with the data obtained from liquid phase
1
H-NMR analysis to provide a comprehensive chemical
analysis within the calibrated range. In our previous com-
munication [5], we reported a satisfactory carbon mass
balance for this reaction. For the triethylamine promotion
study, a nitrogen mass balance of over 95% was obtained
(from NMR). There was also no indication that the amine
1
23