Photocatalytically Reducing CO2 to Methyl Formate
1205
3.3 The UV–Vis DRS Analysis of SrTiO3
and Ag-Loaded SrTiO3 Photocatalysts
shown in Fig. 5. The isotherms showed a type IV IUPAC
pattern with a hysteresis loop, demonstrating that the
pristine SrTiO3 and 7 wt% Ag–SrTiO3 consist of well-
developed mesopores (2.0 nm \ dp B 50 nm) in their
assembled frameworks. From the BJH pore diameter dis-
tributions, as shown in Fig. 5 inset, it is evident that the Ag
loaded SrTiO3 possessed a similar pore diameters with the
pristine SrTiO3. The N2 absorption–desorption analysis
results showed that the Ag loading increased the specific
surface area and total pore volume, and possessed a similar
mean pore diameter to the pristine SrTiO3. The BET spe-
cific surface area of the Ag loaded SrTiO3 samples were
investigated as summarized in Table 2. We focused on the
Ag loaded SrTiO3 with a much larger surface area than the
pristine SrTiO3 particles. As for the specific surface area of
the Ag loaded SrTiO3 samples on different synthesis
temperature, when the temperature reached 150 °C, the
surface area of the catalyst became the largest, which is
possibly because the crystal synthesized at 150 °C are well
crystallized and dispersed with uniform grain size, which is
in well agreement with the SEM analysis, as shown in
Fig. 3b. As shown in Fig. 6c for the photocatalytic activi-
ties analysis, the Ag–SrTiO3 prepared at 150 °C showed
the highest activity. Therefore, 150 °C is considered the
optimum hydrothermal temperature. The surface area of
the crystal decreased as the Ag dosage increased below
5 wt%, and increased at 7 and 9 wt%, as shown in Table 2.
Furthermore, the specific surface area of the 7 wt% Ag–
SrTiO3 crystal increased as the hydrothermal time
increased below 22 h, but the specific surface area sharply
decreased when the time increased to 28 h, possibly due to
a collapse of crystal structure for crystallization period with
a hydrothermal time for 28 h. The result is quite in
accordance with the SEM analysis (shown in Fig. 3h). The
photocatalyst with high specific surface area exhibited the
enhanced activity, which is ascribed to more reaction sites
arising from high specific surface area, and the efficient
transition of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs to the
surface. For all that, the relatively small specific surface
area for our samples suggested that surface area could not
be the decisive factor for its high activity.
Figure 4a showed the typical diffuse reflection spectra for
the SrTiO3 and Ag-loaded SrTiO3 samples. Compared with
the pristine SrTiO3, Ag-loaded SrTiO3 samples have a strong
absorption in the visible light region, which is almost as
strong as that in the UV region. This is attributed to the
surface plasmon resonance of Ag nanoparticles deposited on
SrTiO3 particles [16–18]. Generally speaking, the surface
plasmon absorption band of metal nanoparticles can be
influenced by many factors such as particle size, particle
shape, particle size distribution and surface charge density
etc. The Ag nanoparticles deposited on SrTiO3 particles have
a large number of different shapes and diameters so that their
plasmon oscillations cover a wide range of frequencies [19,
20]. Furthermore, surface plasmon absorption peak becomes
broader and stronger with the increasing of hydrothermal
time. It is the broader and stronger SPA peak that leads to an
extension of the light absorption of the diffuse reflectance
spectra of SrTiO3. The presence of plasmon absorbance and
the negligible change in the lattice parameters (as shown in
Table 1) suggest that most of the metal exists as zerovalent
metal deposits instead of substituting Sr or Ti sites within the
perovskite structure [10]. This indicates that the main portion
of the Ag added was present as zerovalent Ag. The absorp-
tion intensity of the diffuse reflectance spectra of Ag–SrTiO3
is dependent on the synthesis times, which give rise to an
extension of the light absorption with the increase of syn-
thesis times. Theoretically speaking, when the absorption
intensity via UV–Vis analysis increases, the generation of
electron–hole pairs increases, resulting in the photocatalyst
exhibiting a higher photocatalytic activity.
As shown in Fig. 4b, the intercept of the tangent to the
square root of the Kubelka–Munk functions (ahm)1/2 versus
the photon energy (hm) plots would give an estimation of
the band gap for indirect bandgap semiconductors such
as SrTiO3. When the tangent lines are extrapolated to
a1/2 = 0, the band gaps of pristine SrTiO3 and 7 wt%
Ag–SrTiO3 on hydrothermal time for 10, 16, 22 and 28 h
are indicated to be 2.85, 2.28, 2.28, 1.79, and 1.12 eV
respectively. The band gap energy of pristine SrTiO3 is
larger than that of 7 wt% Ag loaded SrTiO3. And it is
evident that the band gap energies of Ag–SrTiO3 on dif-
ferent hydrothermal time decreased with the increasing
hydrothermal time. Thus, 7 wt% Ag–SrTiO3 might absorb
light in a larger wavelength region up to visible light.
3.5 Photocatalytic Activities of SrTiO3 and Ag-Loaded
SrTiO3 Photocatalysts for Reduction of CO2
The Photocatalytic activities of as-synthesized Ag-loaded
SrTiO3 samples during photocatalytic reduction of CO2
under irradiation were evaluated. For the sake of the
improvement of photocatalytic activity, the optimization of
the operational parameters for the CO2 reduction system is
important. In our work, the effects of Ag dosage, time and
temperature of hydrothermal synthesis on the photocata-
lytic activity were investigated. As shown in Fig. 6a,
3.4 The BET Specific Surface Area Analysis of SrTiO3
and Ag-Loaded SrTiO3 Photocatalysts
The porous structure of the pristine SrTiO3 and 7 wt% Ag–
SrTiO3 had been identified by the N2 sorption isotherms, as
123