436
MATYSHAK et al.
hydrogen atom recombination on copper oxide partiꢀ face, the oxidative conversion of methoxy groups into
CO and H via formate dominates over methoxy
2
2
2
cles and MF decomposition (WH2 = k7θMF
+ k θ ).
13 H
group–formate condensation.
The decrease in the formation and disappearance
temperatures of the surface formate complexes sugꢀ
gests that copper markedly raises the oxidizing power
of the catalyst. This property of the catalyst is due to
oxygen activation on supported copper.
It is interesting that the introduction of oxygen and
water vapor decreases the MF and DME formation
rates (Figs. 4, 5). According to spectroscopic data, the
introduction of oxygen and water vapor diminishes the
CONCLUSIONS
The above analysis demonstrates that the main
hydrogen formation reactions are hydrogen atom
recombination on copper clusters and MF decompoꢀ
sition, and the source of CO is MF. It is appropriate to
introduce oxygen and water vapor into the feed: this
will decrease the CO formation rate without affecting
the hydrogen yield.
⎯
1
concentration of linear methoxy groups (1160 cm )
and increases the concentration of formate complexes
(
Figs. 4d, 5d). Apparently, surface oxidation takes
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
place when water vapor and oxygen are present simulꢀ
taneously. Oxidation (increase in the surface oxygen
concentration) changes both the state of copper partiꢀ
cles and the state of the copperꢀmodified ZrO surface
(
demonstrated in [33–35]). On the oxidized surface,
the oxidative conversion of methoxy groups dominates
over the condensation of methoxy groups with formate
complexes.
This work was support by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research, grant no. 07ꢀ03ꢀ00373.
2
0
+1
the oxidation of surface Cu or Cu with water was
REFERENCES
1
2
3
4
. Lindström, B., Pettersson, L., and Menon, P.G., Appl.
Catal., A, 2002, vol. 234, p. 111.
. Zhang, X. and Shi, P., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2003,
vol. 194, p. 99.
. Iwasa, N., Mayanagi, T., and Ogawa, N., Catal. Lett.
998, vol. 54, p. 119.
. Kapoor, M.P., Raj, A., and Matsumura, Y.,
,
Comparison with CeO2
1
A bridging methoxy group, a linear one, and forꢀ
mate and carbonate complexes exist on the CeO and
Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2001, vol. 44, p. 565.
2
5
% Cu/CeO surfaces under methanol conversion
2
5. Schiffino, R.S. and Merril, R.P., J. Phys. Chem., 1993,
vol. 97, p. 6425.
conditions. CO, CO , H , CH , and MF were detected
2
2
4
among the reaction products. A bridging methoxy
group, two types of linear methoxy groups, and a forꢀ
6
. Krylov, O.V. and Matyshak, V.A., Promezhutochnye
soedineniya v geterogennom katalize (Intermediates in
Heterogeneous Catalysis), Moscow: Nauka, 1996.
mate complex were identified on the ZrO and
2
Cu/ZrO surfaces under the same conditions. DME
2
7. Matyshak, V.A., Khomenko, T.I., Lin, G.I., Zavaliꢀ
shin, I.N., and Rozovskii, A.Ya., Kinet. Katal., 1999,
vol. 40, no. 2, p. 295 [Kinet. Catal. (Engl. Transl.),
vol. 40, no. 2, p. 269].
was detected among the reaction products along with
above compounds. The difference between the prodꢀ
uct compositions can be explained in terms of the
methoxy group formation mechanism. On 5%
8
. Neophytides, S.G., Marchi, A.J., and Froment, G.F.,
Appl. Catal., A, 1992, vol. 86, p. 45.
Cu/CeO , the methoxy groups result from the interacꢀ
2
tion between methanol and basic hydroxyl groups with
O–H bond breaking in the alcohol molecule; on 5%
9
. Martin, K.A. and Zabransky, R.F., Appl. Spectrosc.
1991, vol. 45, p. 68.
,
Cu/ZrO , their formation involves both basic hydroxyl
2
10. Matyshak, V.A., Sil’chenkova, O.N., Ismailov, I.T., and
Tret’yakov, V.F., Kinet. Katal., 2009, vol. 50, no. 5,
p. 816 [Kinet. Catal. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 50, no. 5,
p. 784].
groups (O–H bond breaking) and acidic ones
(
C⎯O bond breaking in the alcohol molecule). The
firstꢀtype linear methoxy groups condense with the
formate complex to yield MF and then CO and H2.
The secondꢀtype linear methoxy groups are intermeꢀ
diates in DME formation.
11. Chuah, G.K.,
2. Matyshak, V.A. and Krylov, O.V., Catal. Today, 1996,
vol. 25, p. 1.
Catal. Today, 1999, vol. 49, p. 131.
1
From the standpoint of obtaining hydrogenꢀconꢀ 13. Alekseev, A.V., Lopatin, Yu.N., Tsyganenko, A.A., and
taining gas mixtures from methanol, MF formation is
an undesired process because MF decomposition
Filimonov, V.N., React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1974, vol. 1,
no. 4, p. 443.
yields not only H , but also CO, which is poisonous to 14. Daturi, M., Binet, C., Lavalley, JꢀC., Galtayries, A.,
2
the electrodes of the fuel cell. In this case, it is approꢀ
priate to introduce water vapor and oxygen into the
and Spoken, R., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, vol. 1,
p. 5717.
feed: this will significantly reduce the CO formation 15. Binet, C. and Daturi, M., Catal. Today, 2001, vol. 70,
rate and prevent MF formation without affecting the
p. 155.
hydrogen yield. The addition of oxygen and water 16. Bianci, D., Chafik, T., Khalfallah, M., and Teichner, S.J.,
vapor leads to surface oxidation. On this oxidized surꢀ
Appl. Catal., A, 1995, vol. 123, p. 89.
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 51
No. 3
2010