4928
M. I. Ikhile et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 4925–4928
compounds due to a combination of steric interference of the sub-
stituent to the reactive C@O bond and poor electronic contribu-
References and notes
a
1. Noyori, R.; Ohkuma, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 40.
2. Exner, C.; Pfaltz, A.; Studer, M.; Blaser, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1253.
3. Zhu, Y.; Qian, H.; Drake, B. A.; Jin, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1295.
4. (a) Gnanamgari, D.; Sauer, E. L. O.; Schley, N. D.; Butler, C.; Incarvito, C. D.;
Crabtree, R. H. Organometallics 2009, 28, 321; (b) Wylie, W. N. O.; Lough, A. J.;
Morris, R. H. Organometallics 2012, 31, 2152; (c) Binobaid, A.; Iglesias, M.;
Beetstra, D.; Dervisi, A.; Fallis, I.; Cavell, K. J. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 5426.
5. Aupoix, A.; Bournaud, C.; Vo-Thanh, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2772.
6. (a) Enthaler, S.; Jackstell, R.; Hagemann, B.; Junge, K.; Erre, G.; Beller, M. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 4652; (b) Ohara, H.; Wylie, W. N. O.; Lough, A. J.;
Rautenstrauch, V.; Hoang-Cong, X.; Churlaud, R.; Abdur-Rashid, K.; Morris, R. H.
Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4954.
7. Junge, K.; Schroder, K.; Beller, M. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4849.
8. Yong, G.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9345.
9. Arduengo, A. J., III; Dias, H. V.; Harlow, R. L.; Kline, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 5530.
10. Dragutan, I.; Dragutan, V.; Delaude, L.; Demonceau, A. Arkivoc 2005, x, 206.
11. Occhipinti, G.; Bjørsvik, H. R.; Jensen, V. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6952.
12. Gusev, D. G. Organometallics 2009, 28, 6458.
tion from the methyl group. Ketones in which the reactive C@O
group was b to a CH3 (terminal) were found to be more reactive
than internal C@O groups (bonded by ethyl and propyl groups).
This showed that steric interactions, rather than electronic interac-
tions were the dominant factors for this catalysis. For the para-
substituted acetophenones, replacing the substituent with a less
electrophilic group (entries 12 vs 13) gave a significant increase
in substrate conversion into product. This suggests that the induc-
tive effect (positive or negative) of the group para to the aromatic
C@O group was an important determinant of the extent of the
reaction.
In addition, the scope and selectivity of the catalyst system was
further extended to unsaturated ketones (entries 11–16). The a,b-
unsaturated ketones, 3-penten-2-one (entry 14), and 4-hexen-3-
one (entry 15) were reduced selectively to the corresponding satu-
rated ketones, instead of C@O reduction to the alcohols as observed
in previous entries. Martin and List have shown that the catalyzed
13. Chatterjee, A. K.; Morgan, J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 3783.
14. Bortenschlager, M.; Schutz, J.; Von Preysing, D.; Nuyken, O.; Hermann, W. A.;
Weberskirch, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 6233.
transfer hydrogenation of
a,b-unsaturated ketones results in con-
version into the corresponding saturated ketones with high enanti-
oselectivity.28 Also, Sakaguchi et al.29 reported the selectivity of
their iridium-catalyzed system for the transfer hydrogenation of
unsaturated ketones into saturated products. They further con-
firmed the preferred selectivity of their catalytic system toward
reduction of the C@C double bond over the C@O bonds. On the other
hand, there are numerous examples in the literature of the reduc-
15. Herrmann, W. A.; Kulpe, J. A.; Konkol, W.; Bahrmann, H. J. Organomet. Chem.
1990, 389, 85.
16. Krishna, M. V. V.; Kandepi, M.; Cardoso, J. M. S.; Royo, B. Catal. Lett. 2010, 136,
222.
17. Yigit, M.; Yigit, B.; Ozdemir, I.; Cetinkaya, E.; Cetinkaya, B. Appl. Organomet.
Chem. 2006, 20, 322.
18. Kandepi, V. V. K. M.; Cardoso, J. M. S.; Peris, E.; Royo, B. Organometallics 2010,
29, 2777.
19. Liu, B.; Xia, Q.; Chen, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5513.
20. Hatakeyama, T.; Nakamura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9844.
21. Schuster, O.; Yang, L.; Raubenheimer, H. G.; Albrecht, M. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109,
3445.
22. Hindi, K. M.; Panzner, M. J.; Tessier, C. A.; Cannon, C. L.; Youngs, W. J. Chem. Rev.
2009, 109, 3859.
tion of the carbonyl group of
a,b-unsaturated ketones into the
corresponding alcohols.30 Thus, this system is one of the
few28,29,31 exhibiting high selectivity for the reduction of the C@C
double bond in
the aliphatic
a
,b-unsaturated ketones (entries 14 and 15). For
23. The reactions were monitored by GC analysis with an Agilent capillary gas
chromatograph (GC) model 6820 fitted with a DB wax polyethylene column
a
,b-unsaturated ketones (entries 14 and 15), the
conjugated keto-ene resonance facilitated hydrogenation of the
C@C bond in preference to the C@O bond. On the other hand uncon-
jugated, 5-hexen-2-one (entry 16) was converted into the corre-
sponding alcohol. In this instance the selectivity was in favor of
reduction of the C@O bond, which can be attributed to the (CH2)2
spacer (between the C@C and C@O bonds) that disrupted the
keto-ene conjugation and resonance stabilisation. Aromatic ke-
tones were also converted into the corresponding alcohols even
(0.25 mm in diameter, 30 m in length), and
a flame ionization detector.
Nitrogen gas was used as carrier gas at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. The oven
temperature for the aromatic (except 4-fluoroacetophenone) and the cyclic
(except cyclobutanone) ketones was 70 °C, while for the remaining ketones the
oven temperature was 50 °C. Samples (0.1 lL) were injected at 260 °C front
inlet temperature for the aromatic (except 4-fluoroacetophenone) and the
cyclic ketones (except cyclobutanone). For the remaining ketones the front
inlet temperature was 180 °C.
24. A typical procedure for the transfer hydrogenation reaction is described: 1,3-
diarylimidazolium salt 1 (0.0105 mmol, 3.6 mg) and KOH (0.112 g, 10 ml, 0.2 M
in i-PrOH) were added to a round-bottom flask followed by the addition of
cyclohexanone (2.1 mmol, 0.21 mL). The mixture was refluxed at 82 °C for
12 h. The reaction progress was monitored by taking aliquots at time intervals
which were passed through a pad of silica and injected into a GC. The identities
of the products were assessed by comparison of their retention times with
commercially available (Aldrich Chemical Co.) samples. The percentage
conversions were obtained from integration values of the GC peaks which
were related to residual unreacted ketones.
25. Ouali, A.; Majoral, J.-P.; Caminade, A.-M.; Taillefer, M. ChemCatChem 2009, 1,
504.
26. Alonso, D. A.; Brandt, P.; Nordin, S. J. M.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 9580.
27. The KOH base was assayed using a Perkin Elmer Optima 5300DV ICP-OES.
28. Martin, N. J. A.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13368.
29. Sakaguchi, S.; Yamaga, T.; Ishii, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4710.
30. Mizugaki, T. J.; Kanayama, Y.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
2378.
though they also contain a,b-conjugation involving the C@O bond
(entries 11–13). In these cases the C@C bonds form part of the phe-
nyl ring system, which due to electron delocalization is very stable
and difficult to reduce, thus leading to the selective reduction of the
aromatic ketones to the corresponding alcohols instead.
In conclusion, for the first time, 1,3-diarylimidazolium salts
have successfully been used as catalysts in the absence of transi-
tion metals for the selective reduction of ketone C@O and alkenyl
C@C bonds. Moderate to excellent conversions were obtained for
various ketones including aliphatic, aromatic, cyclic and unsatu-
rated examples. The reaction does not require the usual inert con-
ditions commonly associated with transition metal based catalysis.
When all the permutations are combined together, it can be
concluded that the best substrate for these catalytic systems is
an aromatic ketone containing an electron-donating para
substituent.
31. Gonzalez, S. D.; Correa, A.; Cavallo, L.; Nolan, S. P. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 7558.
Acknowledgements
We thank the University of KwaZulu-Natal and the National
Research Foundation (NRF) for financial support.