A R T I C L E S
Winkler et al.
3,5-Dinitropyridine (21).49 To a stirred solution of 2-chloro-3,5-
dinitropyridine (2.0 g, 10.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL), hydrazinehydrate
(10 mL, 20.0 mmol) was added at 0 °C. After the solution was stirred
for 18 h at room temperature, the precipitate was filtered off and washed
with CH2Cl2 and water. The brownish substance (1.6 g) was heated in
aqueous AgNO3 for 3 h. After it was cooled to room temperature, the
solution was poured into TBME (250 mL). The organic layer was
washed twice with 200 mL of water, twice with 200 mL of aqueous
ammonia (25%), and finally with brine and dried (MgSO4). After the
solvent was removed, the product crystallized in yellowish needles (1.2
g), which were further purified chromatographically (silica gel; CH2Cl2/
pentane 50:50) to furnish 900 mg (5.4 mmol, 54.5%) of 21; mp 106
°C. IR (cm-1, KBr): 3090, 1603, 1589, 1520, 1453, 1339, 1292, 1022,
the well-known instability problems associated with coupled-cluster
calculations including all single, double, and perturbatively estimated
triple excitations [CCSD(T)] for systems with significant multireference
character, BCCD(T) calculations have routinely been carried out for
comparison.59 Brueckner orbitals eliminate contributions from single
excitations in the coupled-cluster ansatz, which often (but not always)59d
cures the shortcomings of the singlereference CCSD(T) approach
[a good example is the energy of (Z)-35, cf. Table 6]. In several cases,
these computations were complemented by multireference methods all
of which are based on complete active space self-consistent field
(CASSCF) wave functions. For benzynes (and related C6H4 isomers),
the eight electron/eight orbital active space covers the six benzene
valence π orbitals and the two formally nonbonding σ orbitals at the
dehydrocarbons. For the pyridynes (C5H3N), this space was extended
by the nitrogen lone pair, resulting in a CASSCF(10,9) wave function.
Dynamic electron correlation was covered by perturbation theory to
second- (CAS-RS2) or third-order (CAS-RS3)60 or by internally
contracted configuration interaction including single and double excita-
tions (CAS-CISD).61 If not mentioned otherwise, MR-CI energies refer
to Davidson-corrected62 values (CAS-CISD+Q). In post-(CAS)SCF
calculations, the core orbitals were kept frozen.
For most computations, Dunning’s correlation consistent cc-pVTZ
basis set with (10s5p2d1f)[4s3p2d1f] contraction for C and N and
(5s2p1d)[3s2p1d] contraction for H was used.63 In selected cases, we
also employed cc-pVDZ and cc-pVQZ basis sets to study the
convergence behavior.64 Vibrational spectra of iodine-containing mol-
ecules had to be calculated with the 6-311G(d,p) Pople type basis set,
as no correlation consistent basis sets are available for I.65
Electron densities for AIM (atoms in molecules) analysis40 have been
recalculated using Cartesian d and f functions (7d, 10f), whereas pure
angular momentum functions are used for all geometry optimizations
and single-point energy calculations. The AIM 2000 program was used
1
832, 722. H NMR (200 MHz, DMSO-d6): δH 9.72 (d, 2H), 9.11 (t,
1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δC 149.64, 144.23, 127.13. MS
(EI, 70 eV) (m/z, %): 169 (63) [M+], 123 (76), 93 (10), 77 (29), 76
(47), 66 (28), 50 (100), 30 (46).
Matrix Isolation Spectroscopy. Matrix isolation experiments were
performed by standard techniques50 with an APD DE-204SL and an
APD DE-202 Displex closed cycle helium cryostat. Matrices were
produced by codeposition of the compound with a large excess of argon
(Messer Griesheim, 99.9999%) on top of a cold CsI window with a
rate of approximately 0.15 mmol/min. To obtain optically clear matrices,
the spectroscopic window was retained at 30 K during deposition and
subsequently cooled to 10 K. FVP experiments were carried out without
additional heating of the spectroscopic window (temperature around
15 K). Matrix infrared spectra were recorded with Bruker IFS 66 and
Equinox 55 FTIR spectrometers with a standard resolution of 0.5 cm-1
using a N2(l) cooled MCT detector in the range 400-4000 cm-1
.
Irradiation at 254 nm was carried out with a Gra¨ntzel low-pressure
mercury arc lamp.
Computational Methods. Geometries of all species were fully
optimized at the BLYP level51,52 (in some cases, the B3LYP,52,53
BPW91,51,54 and B3PW9153,54 functionals have been used for compari-
son), and analytic second derivatives were calculated to characterize
stationary points as minima or transition states. Tight convergence
criteria for gradients (with maximum residual forces on nuclei below
0.000015 au) and a full (99, 590) integration grid, having 99 radial
shells per atom and 590 angular points per shell, have been used
throughout to obtain accurate values for geometries and low-frequency
vibrational modes. A spin-unrestricted formalism has been used
generally, where for calculations on singlet states the initial guess
frontier orbitals have been mixed to destroy (spin-)symmetry and in
each step during a geometry optimization or IRC calculation a new
initial guess was calculated. Whenever a spin-restricted solution was
obtained, it was further tested for instabilities by calculating the
eigenvalues of the Hermitian stability matrices.55 For general consid-
erations regarding DFT calculations on biradicals, see ref 56 and
literature cited therein. For many transition states localized in this work,
the corresponding IRCs were calculated in mass-weighted coordinates
with a step size of 0.05 amu1/2 bohr.45 All DFT calculations were carried
out with Gaussian 98.57
(57) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin,
K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi,
R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.;
Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.;
Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz,
J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng,
C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-
Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98; Gaussian, Inc.:
Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(58) Werner, H.-J.; Knowles, P. J. Molpro 2000.1; Birmingham, 1999.
(59) (a) Lee, T. J.; Scuseria, G. E. In Quantum Mechanical Electronic Structure
Calculations with Chemical Accuracy; Langhoff, S. R., Ed.; Kluwer
Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1997. (b) Bartlett, R. J. In Modern
Electronic Structure Theory; Yarkony, D. R., Ed.; World Scientific:
Singapore, 1995. (c) Taylor, P. R. In Lecture Notes in Quantum Chemistry;
Roos, B. O., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1994. See also (d) Crawford, T. D.;
Stanton, J. F. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 7873 and references therein.
(60) Werner, H.-J. Mol. Phys. 1996, 89, 645.
(61) (a) Werner, H.-J.; Knowles, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 5803. (b)
Knowles, P. J.; Werner, H.-J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 145, 514.
(62) (a) Duch, W.; Diercksen, G. H. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 3018. (b)
Langhoff, S. R.; Davidson, E. R. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1974, 8, 61.
(63) (a) Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1358. (b) Kendall,
R. A.; Dunning, T. H.; Harrison, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 6796. (c)
Dunning, T. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007.
(64) (a) Dunning, J. H., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 9062. (b) Dunning, J.
H., Jr.; Peterson, K. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7799. (c) Petersson, G.
A.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 2183.
Single-point energy computations utilized the Molpro 2000.1
program package employing different levels of theory.58 Because of
(49) Plazek, E. Rec. TraV. Chim. 1953, 72, 569.
(50) Dunkin, I. R. Matrix-Isolation Techniques; Oxford University Press:
Oxford, 1998.
(65) (a) Glukhovstev, M. N.; Pross, A.; McGrath, M. P.; Radom, L. J. Chem.
Phys. 1995, 103, 1878. (b) Basis sets were obtained from the Extensible
Computational Chemistry Environment Basis Set Database, Version 6/19/
03, as developed and distributed by the Molecular Science Computing
Facility, Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory, which is part
of the Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352,
and funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Pacific Northwest
Laboratory is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Battelle Memorial
Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC06-
76RLO 1830. Contact David Feller or Karen Schuchardt for further
information.
(51) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. A 1988, 38, 3098.
(52) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785.
(53) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. Compare (b) Stevens, P.
J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chablowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98,
11623.
(54) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Wang, Y. Phys. ReV. B 1996, 54, 16533.
(55) Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 9047.
(56) (a) Cremer, D.; Filatov, M.; Polo, V.; Kraka, E.; Shaik, S. Int. J. Mol. Sci.
2002, 3, 604. (b) Gra¨fenstein, J.; Kraka, E.; Filatov, M.; Cremer, D. Int. J.
Mol. Sci. 2002, 360. (c) Polo, V.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D. Theor. Chem.
Acc. 2002, 107, 291. (d) Polo, V.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D. Mol. Phys. 2002,
100, 1771. (e) Gra¨fenstein, J.; Hjerpe, A. M.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 1748.
(66) Biegler-Ko¨nig, F.; Scho¨nbohm, J.; Bayles, D. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22,
545.
(67) (a) Wolinski, K.; Hilton, J. F.; Pulay, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
8251. (b) Ditchfield, R. Mol. Phys. 1974, 27, 789.
9
6148 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 19, 2004