A. Maldotti et al. / Journal of Catalysis 253 (2008) 312–317
315
Table 2
Adsorption % of diols and monoalcohols on photocatalysts
a
Photocatalyst
Adsorption (%)
+
+
Si-(alkyl) NW
10
12
19.8
8
9
22.4
4
10
13
4
9
8
<1
2.8
8.5
<1
2.1
6.5
4
Si-(alkyl) NHW
3
Si-alkylNH W
3
a
In a typical experiment the photocatalyst (7 g/l) was suspended under magnetic stirring for 15 min in a CH Cl solution containing the diols or mixtures of their
2
2
monofunctional models. Columns 2 and 3: 1,4-pentanediol or 1,3-butanediol, respectively (0.01 M). Column 4: a mixture of 1-pentanol and 2-pentanol (0.005 M
each). Column 5: a mixture of 1-butanol and 2-butanol (0.005 M each).
of the counterion bound on the solid support affects the relative
reactivity of the two alcoholic functional groups.
tanediol or 1,4-pentanediol and evaluating the amount of diol
adsorbed after 15 min. It is seen in columns 2 and 3 of Table 2
that the adsorption of both 1,3-butanediol and 1,4-pentanediol
occurs in the order Si-alkylNH3W > Si-(alkyl)3NHW > Si-
(alkyl)4NW, indicating that the enhanced polarity of the sur-
face due to the presence of hydrogen atoms instead of alkyl
chains favours the adsorption of the diols. Analogous experi-
ments (columns 4 and 5 of Table 2) were carried out suspend-
ing the photocatalysts in CH2Cl2 solutions containing mixtures
of monofunctional alcohols simulating the two different hy-
droxy functional groups present in the diols: 1-pentanol and
2-pentanol for 1,4-pentanediol (column 4), 1-butanol and 2-bu-
tanol for 1,3-butanediol (column 5). The results obtained con-
firm that adsorption phenomena play a key role in controlling
Previous studies regarding kinetic and mechanistic aspects
of photocatalysis by W10O4 have demonstrated that the pri-
−
3
2
mary reaction between wO and alcoholic substrates involves
hydrogen-atom abstraction from the C–H bond α to the OH
group (Scheme 1) [11–15]. From this point of view, both the
primary and the secondary alcoholic functions of 1,3-butane-
diol and of 1,4-pentanediol can undergo hydrogen-atom ab-
straction by wO from both the α C–H bonds. Since this reaction
leads to carbon centered radicals, the preferential oxidation of
the secondary carbon to give a ketone would be predicted on
the basis of pure thermodynamic considerations [15]. On the
other hand, it is seen in Table 1 that the ratio between aldehyde
and ketone depends on the nature of the counterion. Specifi-
cally, this ratio increases markedly as the alkyl chains of the
cation are substituted by hydrogen atoms. Interestingly enough,
we note that optimal conditions have been found in CH Cl for
4−
the regioselectivity of the W O -assisted photooxidation of
10
32
1,3-butanediol or 1,4-pentanediol. In fact, Table 2 shows that
primary alcohols are adsorbed in a greater extent than are sec-
ondary substrates and, therefore, they can interact easily with
2
2
4
−
obtaining more than 90% of 4-hydroxy-2-butanone (1b) from
,3-butanediol (with Si-(alkyl)4NW) and about 90% of 4-hydr-
oxypentanal (2a) and its cyclic emiacetalic isomers (2c) from
the photoexcited W O . The adsorption of both 1-butanol
10
3
2
1
and 2-butanol become negligible on the less polar photocata-
lyst Si-(alkyl) NW.
4
1
,4-pentanediol (with Si-alkylNH W).
The results of Table 1 show that the selectivity of the pri-
3
The observed effect of the counterion on the regioselectiv-
mary alcohol oxidation is higher for 1,4-pentanediol than for
1,3-butanediol, in line with the fact that this regioselectivity is
expected to be higher when the two competitive sites are more
distant each other. In order to evaluate the possibility that the re-
gioselective oxidation of 1,4-pentanediol to 4-hydroxypentanal
can be also controlled by the nature of the solvent, other pho-
ity of the photoprocess suggests that a first important parameter
affecting the reactivity of the investigated photocatalysts may
be the polarity of the solid surface and, consequently, its in-
teraction with the diol: preferential adsorption effects can be
significant in controlling the selectivity, considering that the re-
gion of the molecule which is more closely associated with the
surface and near to the photoexcited decatungstate is expected
to undergo more rapid oxidation. In particular, the enhanced
polarity of the surface due to the presence of hydrogen atoms
instead of alkyl chains should favour the preferential adsorp-
tion of the primary OH group of the more hydrophilic head of
the diol molecule with respect to the secondary OH group of
its more hydrophobic tail, thus fostering the interaction of the
primary alcoholic group with the photoexcited decatungstate
and, consequently, its oxidation. This statement is supported
by a previous investigation by Fox et al. on the oxidation of
tocatalytic experiments were performed using CH CN as dis-
3
persing medium. We have experimental evidences that, when
the photocatalytic experiments were carried out in this sol-
vent the concentration ratios between aldehyde and ketone were
always lower (in the range 0.6–0.7) than those obtained in
CH Cl independently of the photocatalyst employed (see Ta-
2
2
ble 3 as supplementary material). A plausible explanation is
that the more polar CH CN reduces the diol adsorption and,
3
consequently, the above described surface effects. Accordingly,
adsorption experiments confirm that the monoalcohols models
of 1,4-pentanediol were only slightly adsorbed on all the em-
1
,4-pentanediol by photoexcited TiO where they attributed the
ployed photocatalysts when dissolved in CH CN (<3%).
2
3
observed regioselective oxidation of the primary OH group to a
site selective adsorption on the polar surface of the active pho-
tocatalyst [20].
The activity of the investigated heterogeneous photocat-
4−
alysts can not be compared with that of W O
1
0
in ho-
32
mogeneous solution from a quantitative point of view since
Some experiments were carried out suspending each hetero-
(n-Bu N) W O , which is the salt usually employed for
4
4
10 32
geneous photocatalyst in a CH Cl solution containing 1,3-bu-
2 2
obtaining homogeneous solutions, is not soluble in CH Cl .
2
2