Reactions of Cyclopentadiene with Methyl Vinyl Ketone
few detailed kinetics studies,4-7 especially those that
involve catalysis. In this paper, we report a comprehen-
sive kinetics study of both the uncatalyzed and the
corresponding organotungsten Lewis acid 1-catalyzed DA
reactions of cyclopentadiene (CP) with methyl vinyl
ketone (MVK) and cyclohexadiene (CH) with MVK at
several temperatures. In the current study, the reaction
mechanism of the catalyzed system is assumed to be
simplified model systems were used to assess the changes
in the transition-state structures, reaction pathways, and
reaction energy barriers accompanied by the action of the
catalyst. It is hoped that by combining the results of
experimental kinetics measurements and theoretical
modeling, one can gain better insight in both the uncata-
lyzed and the organometallic Lewis acid-catalyzed DA
reactions. In the current study, for the computational
resource consideration, we chose [(NH3)3W(NO)2]2+ as our
model catalyst in which the tripodal ligand, P(2-py)3 of
catalyst 1, was replaced by three monodentate NH3
molecules. This simplification would certainly reduce the
reliability of the modeling to some degree. However, the
current theoretical study concerns only the primary
catalytic effects exerted by the central metal atom. The
simplified model does make the semiquantitative theo-
retical calculation feasible, and important knowledge can
be learned from this model system.
MVK + Cat-CO f Cat-MVK + CO
(1)
diene + Cat-MVK f [Cat-Ts] f Cat-product (2)
MVK + Cat-product f product + Cat-MVK (3)
and then (2), (3), and so on. The symbol Cat-CO is used
as an abbreviation for the catalyst precursor before its
loss of CO ligand, and TS is the symbol for the transition
state of diene + MVK. Note that step 1 is based on the
experimental observation3a that the evolution of CO took
place upon the addition of organic Lewis bases such as
ketones and aldehydes to the solution of catalyst 1. Step
2 was assumed to be the rate-determining step.
The results of the current kinetic studies would enable
us to obtain quantitative information regarding the rate
constants, catalyst efficiencies, and various activation
parameters, which are extremely important in under-
standing the action of catalysis.
The current experimental study was further comple-
mented by theoretical dynamics modeling. Theoretical
reaction dynamics calculation can often assist experi-
mental study in understanding the nature of the reaction
systems. For example, calculation of the transition states
or even the reaction pathways can elucidate the detailed
reaction mechanism and can, at least qualitatively,
explain the branching ratios of the products if multiple
reaction pathways are possible. The causes of the tem-
perature dependence and the extents of the solvation
effects can also be probed by using modern electronic
structure and reaction dynamics methods. Consequently,
in addition to the experimental kinetics measurements
in the present study, we also performed various electronic
structure calculations on the molecules involved in the
reactions. Dual-level variational transition state theory
calculation8,9 with multidimensional tunneling correction
(VTST/MT)10 was also carried out to model the observed
reaction rate constants. For the catalyzed reactions,
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Meth od s. Cyclopentadiene was freshly cracked
prior to use. Methyl vinyl ketone was dried over KOH and
distilled under nitrogen. Cyclohexadiene was also dried and
distilled over NaBH4 under nitrogen. Nitromethane was
purified over CaCl2 and dried over CaSO4. The organotungsten
Lewis acid [P(2-py)3W(CO)(NO)2](BF4)2 (1) was prepared by
following literature procedures.3a Syringe techniques were
employed in the transfer of all liquid reactants. 1H NMR
spectra for kinetics measurements and product identification
were recorded on a 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. A GC/MS
spectrometer was used for the determination of the product
identities and the endo/exo ratios.
Kin etics. The kinetics was studied in 10 mL of CH3NO2
for both the uncatalyzed and 1-catalyzed reaction systems. To
obtain the activation parameters, the kinetics study were
conducted at three different temperatures within 0-100 °C
range. Three sets of reactant concentrations were applied to
study the reaction orders. See the Supporting Information for
experimental details.
Com p u t a t ion a l Met h od s. (1) Un ca t a lyzed Syst em .
Geometry optimization of the reactants, products, and the
transition states of the uncatalyzed system in the gas phase
was performed using the Hartree-Fock (HF),11 B3LYP hybrid
density-functional theory,12 and Møller-Plesset second-order
perturbation theory (MP2)11,13 with a 6-31+G* basis set.11
Transition states for four possible pathways (endo-cis, endo-
trans, exo-cis, and exo-trans) were calculated. For comparison
with the catalyzed systems, the LANL2DZ14 basis set was also
(9) (a) Truhlar, D. G.; Garrett, B. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 440.
(b) Truhlar, D. G.; Isaacson, A. D.; Garrett, B. C. In Theory of Chemical
Reaction Dynamics; Baer, M., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1985; Vol.
4, p 65.
(10) (a) Liu, Y.-P.; Lu, D.-H.; Gonzalez-Lafont, A,; Truhlar, D. G.;
Garrett, B. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7806. (b) Truong, T. N.;
Lu, D.-h.; Lynch, G. C.; Liu, Y.-P.; Melissas, V. Lafont, A.; Rai, S. N.;
Steckler, R.; Garrett, B. C.; J oseph, T.; Truhlar, D. G. Comput. Phys.
Commun. 1993, 75, 143.
(11) (a) Hehre, W. J .; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Pople, J . A. Ab
initio Molecular Orbital Theory: J ohn Wiley & Sons: New York, 1986.
(b) Szabo, A.; Ostlund, N. S. Modern Quantum Chemistry; McGraw-
Hill: New York, 1989.
(12) (a) Becke, A. D. J . Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Stephens,
P. J .; Devlin, F. J .; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J . J . Phys. Chem.
1994, 98, 11623. (c) Stephens, P. J .; Devlin, F. J .; Ashvar, C. S.; Bak,
K. L.; Taylor, P. R.; Frisch, M. J . ACS Symp. Ser. 1996, 629, 105.
(13) Møller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Phy. Rev. 1934, 46, 616.
(14) (a) Dunning, T. H. J r.; Hay, P. J . In Modern Theoretical
Chemistry; Schaefer, H., F., III, Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1976; Vol. 3,
p 1. (b) Hay, P. J .; Wadt, W. R. J . Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 270. (c) Wadt,
W. R.; Hay, P. J . J . Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 284. (d) Hay, P. J .; Wadt,
W. R. J . Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 299.
(4) (a) Goldstein, E.; Beno, B.; Houk, K. N. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 6036 and references therein. (b) Beno, B. R.; Houk, K. N.;
Singleton, D. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9984, and references
therein. (c) Gugelchuk M. M.; Doherty-Kirby, A. L. J . Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 3490. (d) Klemm, L. H.; Solomon, W. C.; Tamiz. A. P. J . Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 6503. (e) Buback, M.; Heiner, T.; Hermans, B.; Kowollik, K.;
Kozhushkov, S. I.; de Meijere, A. Eur. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 107, 7. (f)
Otto, S.; Engberts, J . B. F. N.; Kwak, J . C. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 9517.
(5) For recent reviews, see: (a) Glebov, E. M.; Krishtopa, L. G.;
Stepanov, V.; Krasnoperov, L. N. J . Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9427.
(b) Tsuda, A.; Oshima, T. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1282.
(6) (a) Otto, S.; Bertoncin, F.; Engberts, J . B. F. N. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 7702. (b) Otto, S.; Engberts, J . B. F. N.; Kwak, J . C. K.
J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9517.
(7) (a) Brunkan, N. M.; White, P. S.; Gagne´, M. R. Organometallics
2002, 21, 1565. (b) Brunkan, N. M.; Gagne´, M. R. Organometallics
2002, 21, 1576.
(8) (a) Hu, W.-P.; Liu, Y.-P.; Truhlar, D. G.,J . Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 1994, 90, 1715. (b) Corchado, J . C.; Espinosa-Garcia, J .; Hu,
W.-P.; Rossi, I.; Truhlar, D. G. J . Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 687. (c)
Chuang, Y.-Y.; Truhlar, D. G. J . Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3808.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 8, 2003 3069