8
M. Boronat et al. / Journal of Catalysis 315 (2014) 6–14
partially oxidized gold nanoparticle containing three types of sites:
metallic Au0 centers, slightly positively charged Aud+ sites directly
bonded to one O atom, and cationic Au+ centers in which the Au
atom is directly bonded to two O atoms forming a linear OAAuAO
structure, as described in previous work [27]. The calculated
adsorption, activation and reaction energies, schematized in
Fig. 1, are summarized in Table 2 and the optimized geometries
of the structures involved in the mechanism are depicted in
Figs. 2–4.
PA adsorption and dissociation on isolated neutral gold nano-
particles was investigated as one of the elementary steps in the
Sonogashira reaction between PA and IB [15]. It was found that
PA adsorbs strongly on low coordinated neutral Au0 atoms at
corner or edge sites, but the dissociation process is endothermic
by 20 kcal/mol and involves an activation energy of almost
40 kcal/mol (see Table 2). As previously described, the presence
of a base (carbonate) lowers the barrier to 9.0 kcal/mol, and the
process becomes exothermic by 7.7 kcal/mol. After dissociation
on an isolated Au38 nanoparticle, the phenylacetylenyl fragment
is placed on top of a low coordinated Au atom, while the H atom
occupies a bridge position between two Au atoms (see Fig. 2).
The surface coupling step occurs through a transition state in
which the CAC bond is formed while the two organic fragments
are still quite strongly bonded to the Au atoms, as indicated by
the optimized values of the CAAu distances, 2.04 Å. The calculated
activation energy for this elementary step is 25 kcal/mol and DPDA
formation and desorption releases 8.5 kcal/mol.
It has been recently reported that small gold clusters are highly
efficient in the activation of the C„C bond in alkynes [28,29] and,
in order to check the relevance of this effect on the mechanism of
alkyne homocoupling, PA adsorption and dissociation over a small
Au3 cluster was also investigated. As depicted in Fig. 3, PA interacts
strongly with the low coordinated atoms of the Au3 cluster produc-
ing an activation and weakening of the C„C bond reflected in an
increase in the CC bond length of 0.05 Å. However, this interaction
does not favor the desired dissociation of the CAH bond, which is
endothermic by 21 kcal/mol and involves an activation barrier of
30 kcal/mol. Moreover, the calculated activation energy for the
coupling of two phenylacetylenyl fragments attached to the Au3
cluster is as high as 27.5 kcal/mol, indicating that such small clus-
ters should not be active for alkyne homocoupling.
calculated reaction energy for PA deprotonation, 10.8 kcal/mol, is
not as endothermic as on the Au38 model, but we should take into
account that it also includes the energy gain due to formation of a
OAH bond. To compare the stability of phenylacetylenyl fragments
directly bonded to metallic or cationic Au sites, a Au38O2 model
was used that contains metallic Au0 and cationic Aud+ and Au+ sites
(see Fig. 5 and Table 1). Phenylacetylenyl interacts much stronger
with metallic Au0 atoms in Au38 and Au38O2 models than with cat-
ionic Aud+ centers and Au+ sites, following the linear trend depicted
in Fig. 5. This result suggests a higher reactivity of phenylacetyle-
nyl fragments bonded to cationic Aud+ and Au+ sites and, indeed,
the calculated activation energies for the surface coupling step
are in this line. The barrier obtained on the Au38O16 model, in
which the two reactant phenylacetylenyl fragments are directly
interacting with cationic Aud+ sites, is 18 kcal/mol, 7 kcal/mol
lower than on the metallic Au38 system.
Besides PA deprotonation and surface coupling steps, O2 disso-
ciation generating adsorbed O atoms and cationic Aud+ and Au+
sites is necessary to close the catalytic cycle. It should be remarked
at this point that the activation barriers for O2 dissociation over
gold nanoparticles vary considerably with particle size and shape
[27,30,31]. Thus, for instance, the activation barriers for successive
O2 dissociation over the most favorable site of cuboctahedral Au38
NPs leading to formation of a gold oxide over layer are around
8 kcal/mol or less [27]. But when the process takes place at edge
sites also present in Au38 and in larger, smaller or irregular gold
nanoparticles, the activation barriers increase by 10–20 kcal/mol
[30,31], suggesting that O2 dissociation might be the rate deter-
mining step for the global homocoupling reaction.
Next, we considered four different models for the Au/CeO2
catalysts containing different types of neutral and cationic sites:
(a) a gold nanorod on a partially oxidized CeO2(111) surface
(AuOx/CeO2 model, see Computational Details section) that con-
tains both Au0 and Aud+ species; (b) a Au2O3 strip on stoichiometric
CeO2(111) that only contains cationic Au+ and Au3+ atoms (Au2O3/
CeO2 model); (c) a Au10 cluster on stoichiometric CeO2(111) that
only contains metallic low coordinated Au0 sites (Au10/CeO2
model); and (d) a Au9 cluster on a partially oxidized CeO2(111)
surface (Au9O7/CeO2 model) that contains low coordinated metal-
lic Au0 and cationic Au+ species, as indicated by the Bader charges
listed in Table 1.
The effect of cationic gold sites and basic oxygen atoms is more
relevant. PA adsorption at slightly positive Aud+ sites and at
cationic Au+ centers present in the partially oxidized Au38O16
model is energetically favored (À7.3 and À4.1 kcal/mol at Aud+
and Au+, respectively) and the activation barrier for its deprotona-
tion (14.4 and 12.6 at Aud+ and Au+, respectively) is considerably
lower than on the pure metallic Au38 nanoparticle, because it is
assisted by a basic O atom from the gold oxide over layer. After dis-
sociation, the phenylacetylenyl fragment is occupying a bridge
position between a Au0 and a Aud+ (or Au+) site (see Fig. 4). The
PA was initially adsorbed at neutral Au0 and cationic Aud+, Au+
and Au3+ atoms present in the different Au/CeO2 models, and the
resulting optimized structures and calculated adsorption energies
are given in Fig. 6 and Table 2, respectively. It was found that PA
cannot adsorb on cationic Au3+ atoms present in the Au2O3/CeO2
model, but interacts with Au+ sites in the same system, with calcu-
lated adsorption energies ranging between À6.7 and À9.5 kcal/
mol. A weaker interaction was found with slightly positive Aud+
sites present in AuOx/CeO2 and Au9O7/CeO2 models, with calcu-
lated adsorption energies around À3 kcal/mol. And, as found for
isolated gold nanoparticles, the stronger interaction is obtained
for PA adsorption at low coordinated metallic Au0 sites present
in Au10/CeO2 and Au9O7/CeO2 models, with calculated adsorption
energies ranging between À9 and À13 kcal/mol.
PA dissociation on metallic Au0 sites was not investigated on
Au/CeO2 models based on the high activation barrier obtained on
the isolated Au38 nanoparticle, but was calculated on all cationic
Au sites. In all cases, the activation energies obtained were lower
than 15 kcal/mol, and the dissociation process was found to be
exothermic. However, it is not possible to directly compare the
stability of the phenylacetylenyl fragments from calculated
DEPA
reaction energies on the different models because the dissociation
process always involves formation of a OAH bond whose stability
depends on the basicity of the O atom involved. To avoid this prob-
lem in the calculation of the activation barriers for the bimolecular
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of energy profiles for PA dissociation (left) and for
bimolecular coupling step (right) in gold catalyzed PA homocoupling.