Table 1 Composition of the reaction mixtures, experimental conditions and relative product yields for the reaction CH ] n-C H : (p(Ar)
3
4 10
added up to p ; pulse duration: 50 ms; accumulation of 1000 to 10 000 pulses). The experiment with a total pressure of 80 mbar and 4.53 mbar
total
SF was repeated to show the reproducibility. The alternative relative C H and C H yields are due to the uncertainties in the MS sensitivities
6
2
4
3
6
relative to CF
4
T /K
765
795
945
p
/mbar
80
0.8
0.5
133
1.33
0.8
80
4.53
0.5
80
4.53
0.5
133
4.53
0.8
total
SF
6
CF
4
Educts p/mbar
DTBP
n-C H
Relative product yield (%)
C H
2.72
24.5
4.53
40.7
2.72
24.5
2.72
24.5
4.53
40.7
4
10
30.7
or 35.9
50.7
or 45.5
1.4
1.9
8.7
28.1
or 32.9
48.1
or 43.3
2.5
0.9
12.8
7.6
47.3
or 53.6
49.0
or 42.8
1.2
0.1
2.2
49.7
or 56.0
46.7
or 40.5
1.1
0.1
2.1
48.3
or 54.7
48.5
or 42.3
1.0
0.1
2.0
2
4
C H
3
6
1-C H
n-C H
C H
iso-C H
4
8
5
12
3
8
6.6
0.2
0.3
0.1
5
12
perature proÐle is reached within 1È3 ms with a maximum
temperature at the optical axis of the cell. During the 50 ms
using the temperature-dependent optical absorption coeffi-
cient of SF (similar to ref. 8); (3) by the measurement of the
6
duration of the CO laser pulse the temperature proÐle in the
pressure
rise
in
the
total
volume
(V (reaction
2
cell remains constant and decays after the laser pulse within
cylinder) ] V (dead space)) for a given absorbed energy;10 and
(4) by the measurement of the conversion of cyclopropane (c-
C H ) to propene (C H ) via the well-established
about 1È3 ms. Cycles of heating and “coolingÏ were obtained
due to the repeated application of laser pulses, hence a com-
plete mixing of the heated gas in the middle of the cell with
the cold gas near the wall is achieved through gas convection.
This leads to a complete homogenization of the gas composi-
tion between the laser pulses. The time for ordinary di†usion
from the center to the wall is of the order of 30 ms, thus rad-
icals produced in the center are removed mainly by homoge-
neous reactions. Convective Ñow into the non-isothermal
region leads to mixing with the gas of the dead space, but no
deposit was found at the reactor wall.
3
6
3 6
temperature-dependent rate of this isomerization.6
(1) The VÈT energy transfer from the SF , excited by the IR
absorption at 10.59 lm, to the excess of Ar at pressure P is
6
fast with a relaxation time q, as given by the relation log (P É q
atm~1 s~1) \ [ 8.5 ] 31.1 ] (T /K)~1@3.6 Therefore, station-
ary heat balance between the absorbed laser Ñuence and heat
conduction through a cylinder surface (2prl) can be assumed.
We solved the di†erential equation numerically taking into
account the laser intensity proÐle (see Fig. 2), the temperature-
dependent thermal conductivity11,12 of the mixture (Ar,
hydrocarbon, SF , DTBP, CF ), and the condition of a con-
The maximum temperature can be measured by using a
chemical thermometer like the isomerization reaction cyclo-
propane (c-C H ) ] propene (C H ) or thermal decomposi-
6
4
stant wall temperature of 300 K. We found stationary tem-
perature proÐles to be established within the Ðrst ms of the
3
6
3 6
tion of di-tert-butyl peroxide (DTBP). Since the rate constants
show considerable activation energies, measurable conversion
occurs only at the highest temperature in the center of the
reaction cell. We found only a low conversion of c-C H , due
rectangular CO laser pulse of 50 ms duration. Temperature
2
proÐles are shown in Fig. 3 (curve (a), (b)) for typical experi-
mental conditions.
3
6
to the low rate coefficient and long life time, respectively
(q(700 K) D 105 s; q(1000 K) \ 2.5 s).
(2) The optical absorption coefficient of SF is strongly tem-
6
perature dependent.13 By measuring the absorbed energy at
The temperature in each CH ] n-C H experiment was
di†erent radial positions in the volume, through variation of
the exit aperture diameter and applying BeerÏs law, the gas
density and thereby the temperature was deduced. This pro-
cedure is equivalent to that of ref. 8 and 9 where the density of
3
4 10
determined experimentally in the following way. The same gas
mixture in which small amounts of argon have been replaced
by c-C H was heated with identical laser power. The
3
6
resulting temperature for both experiments was deduced from
the conversion of c-C H into C H .
CS or cycloheptatriene was determined by an in situ optical
2
UV absorption method. Typical temperature proÐles from this
3
6
3 6
The thermal decomposition of DTBP, the CH radical
method are also given in Fig. 3 (curve (c), (d)) however, for
lower absorbed power than in curve (a) and (b). Good agree-
ment between the methods (1) and (2) has been found.
3
source in this study, proceeds on a ms timescale and the CH
3
radicals disappear predominately in a recombination reaction
producing ethane. The rate of the hydrocarbon reaction under
study can be adjusted by the partial pressure of the hydrocar-
bon. Here the reaction CH ] C H is shown as an example.
(3) The pressure rise is directly related to the absorbed laser
power and thus, for a given geometry, is a measure of tem-
perature proÐle in the cell. Under our condition we kept the
pressure rise in the total volume low (less than 5%) by choos-
ing the volume of the reaction cylinder to be much smaller
than the volume of the dead space, as described in ref. 10. As a
result, all experiments were performed under essentially iso-
thermal conditions. We calibrated the measured pressure
increase by methods (1) and (2) and in this way had a simple
way of checking the reproducibility of the repetitive laser
heating procedure.
3
4 10
Experiments without the methyl radical precursor DTBP did
not give any products since at temperatures below 1000 K the
decomposition of butane is too slow.
Results
Temperature proÐles in the reactor
The radial temperature proÐles in the reactor were deduced
by four di†erent methods, which have been described in prin-
ciple in the literature: (1) By measurement of the total energy
absorbed in the volume and analysis of the heat transfer
balance absorbed power/heat conduction;8,9 (2) by the mea-
surement of the radial distribution of the absorbed energy
(4) The fundamentals of using a chemical thermometer have
been discussed extensively in ref. 6 and therefore only our
experimental results are presented. The experimentally deter-
mined conversion of c-C H to C H is compared to calcu-
3
6
3 6
lated conversions by adopting the literature value for the
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2, 5127È5132 5129