trialkyl phosphines,7 tertiary amines,8 or imidazoles.9 In
contrast to the large amount of literature dealing with
structural variations of catalysts for the acetylation there are
only a few reports that are (partly) concerned with the role
of the acetylating agent.2b,10 The commonly used acetyl
donors acetic anhydride and acetyl chloride, respectively, are
supposed to react with DMAP to build a covalent, ionic
intermediate (A, Figure 1). Subsequently, this reactive species
nucleophile to wider ion pairs should be facilitated. Ad-
ditionally, the acetate ion can act as a general base catalyst
by deprotonating the nucleophile in the transition state.
Though this explanation seems to be plausible no experi-
ments have been carried out to support this notion. Recently,
Yoshida et al. disclosed some surprising results on the
DMAP-catalyzed acetylation of different octyl glycopyrano-
sides.1a By using Ac2O in the presence of a heterogeneous
base (K2CO3), mainly the secondary hydroxyl groups at
positions 3 and 4 were acetylated, the primary group at C-6
remained almost unaffected. These contraintuitive results
were attributed to a complex hydrogen bond network and to
the catalytic activity of DMAP.
In this paper we want to communicate our results, which
indicate that the deprotonation of the transition state has a
pronounced impact on the reaction rate for primary and
secondary alcohols. Depending on the auxiliary base, the
relative reactivities of acetyl chloride and acetic anhydride
can be reversed, which was shown by kinetic measurements
with simple alcohols. Octyl â-D-glucopyranoside can be
acetylated with high selectivity either on the primary or on
secondary OH groups by using different acetylation agents
under otherwise identical conditions.
Figure 1. Mechanism of the DMAP-catalyzed acetylation.
reacts with the alcohol (B, Figure 1). Deprotonation of this
complex gives rise to the formation of the ester and
regenerates the catalyst. NMR and IR studies have shown
that the equilibrium of the reaction of acetyl chloride and
DMAP is shifted completely to the right, whereas acetic
anhydride only gives 5-10% of the corresponding ionic
complex (A) at room temperature.1b The concentration of
this active complex is believed to control the reaction rate
(Figure 1). However, it was noted by several groups that
DMAP-catalyzed acetylations with acetyl chloride as acetyl
To compare the reactivity of different acetylating agents,
we started a series of experiments with 1-propanol and
2-propanol. K2CO3 served as a heterogeneous or pyridine
as a homogeneous base in our experiments with CDCl3 as
solvent. DMAP was used as a catalyst in all cases. Acetyl
chloride, being the reagent with the highest carbonyl reactiv-
ity among the tested reagents, is converted very fast in the
presence of pyridine (2 equiv) as auxiliary base in CDCl3 as
solvent and 5 mol % of DMAP as catalyst. 1H NMR kinetics
indicate a half-life for the reaction with both 1-propanol as
well as 2-propanol of less than 10 s. In correlation with the
lower carbonyl reactivity, the reaction rate for acetic
anhydride was significantly slower for both 1- and 2-propanol
(t1/2 ) 11 and 120 min, respectively). With K2CO3 as the
heterogeneous, auxiliary base the relative order of reaction
rates was reVersed and the half-life times for both reactions
with acetyl chloride were rather slow (t1/2 ) 35 and 200 min).
This observed low reactivity is consistent with previous
reports (vide supra).2b,3a In contrast to that, the reactions with
acetic anhydride were considerably faster under these condi-
tions (t1/2 ) 3.2 and 18 min).11 Though these results, in view
of marked differences in carbonyl activity, might be surpris-
ing at first sight, the reversed reaction rates may be
contributed to the basicity of the counterion of the catalyti-
cally active ionic complex (A, Figure 1). In the presence of
a homogeneous base the deprotonation of the transition state
(B, Figure 1) can be performed by the auxiliary base or the
counterion. By using a base such as K2CO3, which is
insoluble in the reaction system, the deprotonation has to be
carried out by the acetate or chloride counterion. This implies
that the proton-transfer step influences the reaction rate. To
support this notion experiments with the labeled compounds
donor are slower than those with acetic anhydride.2b,3a
A
given explanation for that is based on structural differences
in catalytically active ion pairs. Mesomerically stabilized
anions such as acetates exist as wider ion pairs compared
to those with anions such as chloride. The attack of the
Chem. Lett. 2002, 1114. (e) Ruble, J. C.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 7230-7231. (f) Ruble, J. C.; Latham, H. A.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 1492-1493. (g) Ruble, J. C.; Tweddell, J.; Fu, G. C. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2794-2795. (h) Fu, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000,
33, 412-420. (i) Kawabata, T.; Nagato, M.; Takasu, K.; Fuji, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3169-3170. (j) Kawabata, T.; Yamamoto, K.;
Momose, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Nagaoka, Y.; Fuji, K. Chem. Commun. 2001,
2700-2701. (k) Priem, G.; Pelotier, B.; Macdonald, S. J. F.; Anson, M. S.;
Campbell, I. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3844-3848. (l) Vedejs, E.; Chen,
X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1809-1810. (m) Kawabata, T.; Stragies,
R.; Fukaya, T.; Fuji, K. Chirality 2003, 15, 71-78. (n) Kawabata, T.;
Stragies, R.; Fukaya, T.; Nagaoka, Y.; Schedel, H.; Fuji, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 1545-1548. (o) Spivey, A. C.; Zhu, F.; Mitchell, M. B.;
Davey, S. G.; Jarvest, R. L. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7379-7385. (p) Shaw,
S. A.; Aleman, P.; Vedejs, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13368-13369.
(7) (a) Vedejs, E.; Daugulis, O.; Diver, S. T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
430. (b) Vedejs, E.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5813-
5814.
(8) (a) Oriyama, T.; Hori, Y.; Imai, K.; Sasaki, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 8543-8546. (b) Oriyama, T.; Imai, K.; Hosoya, T.; Sano, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 397-400. (c) Mizuta S.; Sadamori, M.;
Fujimoto, T.; Yamamoto, I. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3505-3507.
(9) (a) Jarvo, E. R.; Copeland, G. T.; Papaioannou, N.; Bonitatebus, P.
J., Jr.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11638-11643. (b)
Sculimbrene, B. R.; Morgan, A. J.; Miller, S. J. Chem. Commun. 2003,
1781-1785. (c) Vasbinder, M. M.; Jarvo, E. R.; Miller, S. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2824-2827 and references therein.
(11) In contrast to the acetylation with 2 equiv of pyridine (Table 1,
entry 2), the solvent environment is less polar, thereby accelerating the
reaction: see refs 2b and 10.
(10) Guibe-Jampel, E.; Le Corre, G.; Wakselman, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1979, 20, 1157-1160.
946
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 6, 2004