Full Paper
compound 3 (0.5 g, 3.618 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of
anthracene-9-carboxaldehyde (0.74 g, 3.618 mmol) in methanol.
Then the solution was refluxed for 3 h. After completion of the
reaction, the obtained yellow precipitate was filtered and washed
Scattering (DLS) measurements were performed using a Nano-ZS
90-Malvern instrument (Model DLS-nano ZS, Zeta-sizer, Nano series)
employing a 4 mW He–Ne laser (λ = 632.8 nm) equipped with a
thermostatic sample chamber. The size distributions of the samples
several times with cold methanol to give ANHP as pure yellowish were calculated using the associated instrument software. The AFM
1
solid (Scheme 2). Yield: 0.9 g, 76.2 %. H NMR (300 MHz, [D ]DMSO):
images of all igepal surfactants with ANHP were taken on a Veeco,
model AP0100 in noncontact mode. Total 10 μL solution of all
igepal surfactants in the presence of ANHP were deposited sepa-
rately on freshly cleaved (1 cm × 1 cm) mica and dried overnight
before imaging.
6
δ = 11.31 (s, 1 H, CH=N), 9.26 (s, 1 H, Ar-H), 8.69 (d, J = 9 Hz, 3 H,
Ar-H), 8.09 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2 H, Ar-H), 7.58 (m, 4 H, Ar-H), 6.61 (s, 1 H,
1
3
Py-H), 2.27 (s, 6 H) ppm (Figure S8). C NMR (300 MHz, [D ]DMSO):
6
δ = 31.10 (2 C, 2m), 112.26 (1 C, 1l), 125.65, 125.87, 126.81, 127.15,
28.79, 129.31, 129.85, ( C, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f &1g), 131.49 (1 C,
h), 140.14 (1 C, 1i) 160.33 (1 C, 1j), 167.88 (2 C, 2k), ppm (Figure
1
3
1
Theoretical Section: Ground state geometries of ANHP was opti-
1
[36,37]
[38,39]
mized with density functional theory
using the B3LYP
–
1
S9). IR (KBr): ν˜ = 3217 (N–H), 1597 (C=N) (Figure S10) cm (Figure
functional with the standard basis set, 6-311G, for all atoms. The
wave function-based electron correlation method CIS is the best
choices to calculate the excited state geometry and optoelectronic
properties. Tsuji et al. suggested the use of CIS excited structures
with TD-DFT energies as the most suitable method to determine
fluorescence wavelengths and compared it with experimental
measurements. To get better results, we optimized the ground and
excited state geometries of ANHP by DFT/6-311G and CIS/6-311G
methods, respectively. We then calculated the absorption and emis-
+
S10). ESI-MS: m/z calculated for C H N [M + H] 327.15, found
2
1 18 4
3
1
27.31 (Figure S11). C H N (326.40): calcd. C 77.40, H 5.61, N
7.18; found C 77.28, H 5.56, N 17.17.
21 18 4
[
40]
sion spectra of ANHP using the TD-DFT method
with the B3LYP
exchange-correlation functional. The results of theoretical calcula-
tions corresponded to the experimental observations. All simula-
[
41]
tions were performed using the Gaussian 09 program.
Acknowledgments
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the probe ANHP.
D. S. is thankful to the Department of Science and Technology
(DST), New Delhi, India, for the Research Associate sponsorship.
A. D. acknowledges the financial support provided by the Uni-
versity Grants Commission, India [Award letter No. F.4-2/
Methods
1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained from a Bruker Avance DPX
3
4
00 spectrometer using [D ]DMSO solution. Infrared spectra (4000–
6
–1
00 cm ) were taken on KBr pellets using PerkinElmer Spectrum 2006(BSR)/CH/14-15/0163, dated May, 2015], through a Dr. D. S.
BX-II IR spectrometer. Mass spectroscopic analysis of the ligand was Kothari Post Doctoral Fellowship (DSKPDF). S. C. B. acknowl-
performed in a QTOF Micro YA263 ESI-TOF mass spectrometer using edges financial assistance from the Department of Science and
methanol as solvent. Elemental analyses (carbon, hydrogen and
Technology (DST) SERB (EMR/2015/000678).
nitrogen) were performed with a Perkin–Elmer CHN analyzer 2400.
Absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded using a Shim-
adzu (model UV1700) UV/Vis spectrophotometer and Shimadzu
spectrofluorometer (model RF 5301) respectively. Fluorescence de- Vesicles · Density functional calculations
Keywords: Synthesis design · Excimers · Drug carriers ·
cay curves were obtained from time-resolved intensity decay by the
method of time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) using a
[
[
[
1] S. Narwal, S. Kumar, P. K. Verma, Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11:52; https://
2] S. Yuan, H. Chu, H. Zhao, K. Zhang, K. Singh, B. K. C. Chow, R. Y. T. Kao,
J. Zhou, B. J. Zheng, Antiviral Res. 2016, 125, 34–42.
3] R. Aggarwal, G. Singh, P. Kaushik, D. Kaushik, D. Paliwal, A. Kumar, Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2015, 101, 326–333.
nanosecond diode LED at 370 nm (IBH, nano LED) as a light source.
The data stored in a multichannel analyzer was routinely transferred
to IBH DAS-6 decay analysis software. For all the lifetime measure-
ments, the fluorescence decay curves were analyzed by bi- and tri-
exponential iterative fitting program provided by IBH such as in
Equation (1):
[4] L. Calu, M. Badea, R. C. Koro sˇ ec, P. Bukovec, C. G. Daniliuc, M. C. Chifiriuc,
L. Mescu, C. Ciulica, G. Serban, R. Olar, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127,
697–708.
F(t) = Σ a exp –(t/τ )
(1)
i
i
i
[
5] T. Venkatesh, Y. D. Bodke, N. M. Joy, B. M. Vinoda, Y. Shiralgi, B. L. Dhanan-
jaya, Lett. Org. Chem. 2016, 13, 661–671.
where a is the pre-exponential factor representing the fractional
i
[
[
6] B. Kuppast, H. Fahmy, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 113, 198–213.
7] J. G. Geist, S. Lauw, V. Illarionova, B. Illarionov, M. Fischer, T. Grawert, F.
Rohdich, W. Eisenreich, J. Kaiser, M. Groll, C. Scheurer, S. Wittlin, J. L.
Alonso-Gomez, W. B. Schweizer, ChemMedChem 2010, 5, 1092–1101.
8] C. Mombereau, K. Kaupmann, W. Froestl, G. Sansig, H. V. D. Putten, J. F.
Cryan, Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 29, 1050–1062.
contribution to the time-resolved decay of the component with
lifetime. Average lifetime for bi exponential decay can be calculated
as in Equation (2).
[
[
<
τ> = (a τ + a τ )/(a + a )
(2)
1
1
2 2
1
2
9] Á. Baji, T. Kiss, J. Wölfling, D. Kovács, N. Igaz, M. K. Gopisetty, M. Kiricsi,
É. Frank, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 172, 79–88.
For picosecond laser diode (IBH, Nanoled) at 376 nm was used to
excite the sample and to collect the signals at a magic angle (54.7)
Hamamatsu microchannel plate photomultiplier tube (3809U) was
used. The instrument response function (IRF), excitation pulse dura-
tion, repetition rate, TAC range of the set up is100 ps. Dynamic Light
[
10] K. F. M. Atta, O. M. Farahat, S. M. Ghobashy, G. M. Marei, Molecules 2011,
6, 10387–10408.
[11] K. Murali, H. A. Sparkes, K. J. Rajendra Prasad, Euro. J. Med. Chem. 2017,
128, 319–331.
1
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 0000, 0–0
www.eurjic.org
6
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim