4
6
E. Martínez-Belmonte et al. / Catalysis Today 212 (2013) 45–51
2
. Experimental
2.1. Synthesis
MCM-41 materials containing Al and Ga were prepared by a
reported method [15]. Cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTACl)
was used as surfactant and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBA)
as a second organic agent. Fumed silica, sodium aluminate and gal-
lium nitrate were used as silicon, aluminum and gallium sources,
respectively. All reagents were supplied by Aldrich and used with-
out further purification. A series of Al–Ga-MCM-41 materials were
prepared from a synthesis gel with the following molar composi-
tion: 0.009 CTACl:0.004 TBA:0.027SiO2:0.00025Al O :0.739H O.
2
3
2
The amount of Ga was varied according to the following molar
ratios Ga/Al = 1.8, 1.2 and 0.9, corresponding to Si/(Al + Ga) = 32, 27
and 21 molar ratios in the gel. The reagents were stirred until a
gel was formed. The gel was introduced inside a Teflon bottle and
◦
placed in an oven for 48 h at 95 C. In order to remove the tem-
Fig. 1. XRD patterns for the calcined supports MCMR60 (Al-MCM-41) and (a)
MCMR21, (b) MCMR27 and (c) MCMR32 .
plate, the resultant material was washed with deionized water and
◦
◦
◦
then calcined, first at 225 C for 3 h, then at 540 C for 6 h. Airflow
was used during all the calcination process. The resultant mate-
rials were labeled as MCMRa, where a indicates the Si/(Al + Ga)
ratio in the synthesis gel. An Al-MCM-41 material with no Ga
was also prepared for comparison, the Si/Al ratio for this mate-
rial was 60, which represents the constant amount of Al in all
the materials. NiMo/MCMRa catalysts were prepared by incipient
wetness impregnation using aqueous solutions of ammonium hep-
tamolybdate and nickel nitrate supplied by Aldrich, as Mo and Ni
precursors, respectively. The nominal composition of the catalysts
was 13.43 wt.% of MoO3 and 3.43 wt.% of NiO. After impregnation,
1
0 kHz and 5 kHz, respectively. The catalysts were characterized
by Temperature-Programmed Reduction (TPR) in an ISRI, RIG-100
model. The parameters of the experiment were 60 ml/min of 10%
◦
H /Ar flow, 40 mg of catalyst with a heating rate of 10 C/min.
2
TEM JEOL2010FEG equipment was used to determine the Ga
distribution in the solid structure with a resolution 1.9 A˚ point to
point and a spheric aberration (Cs) of 0.5 cm. This equipment was
coupled to a Scanning-Transmission Electronic Microscopy (STEM)
unit, with HAADF detector.
◦
◦
the catalysts were dried at 120 C for 2 h and then calcined at 400 C
for 4 h. Prior to catalytic tests, the calcined catalysts particles were
sieved (80-100 MESH) to avoid intra-particle diffusion.
2.3. Catalytic evaluation
The catalytic evaluation of the transformation of 4,6-
dimethyldibenzothiophene over NiMo/MCMRa was performed in
a 450 ml batch reactor. Prior to the reaction, the catalysts were sul-
2.2. Characterization
fided ex situ inside a tubular reactor in a stream of H S 10 vol% in
H at 400 C for 1 h. The sulfided samples were transferred carefully
2
The XRD patterns were obtained in a Siemens D500 difractome-
ter with ꢀCu = 1.5418 A˚ at using the grazing beam method. The
2
◦
to the reactor under an inert atmosphere. For each reaction, 0.2 g of
4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (Aldrich, 98%) and 0.2 g of catalyst
were loaded into the reactor in 100 ml of dodecane (Aldrich, 99%).
evaluation of the diffractograms was made by DIFFRAC/AT soft-
◦
◦
ware. The scanning was made from 1.5 to 10 with a 2ꢁ step size
◦
of 0.02 and a step time of 2 s. Position correction was made using
◦
The parameters of the catalytic evaluation were 320 C, 800 psi of
the NIST standard reference material 1975.
H and a reaction time of 8 h. In the course of the reaction, a series of
The adsorption–desorption isotherms were obtained in an
Autosorb-1 Quantachrome, at the N2 boiling point. The specific
surface areas were calculated by using the BET method. The pore
volumes were obtained by N2 adsorption at a relative pressure of
2
liquid samples were taken every half hour. Reaction products were
analyzed by gas chromatography (Perkin Elmer Auto System XL Gas
TM
Chromatograph with an Alltech ECONO-CAP , 30 m × 0.25 mm
column). The conversion of 4,6 DMDBT and the product yields
were calculated at every reaction time from the products and 4,6
DMDBT concentrations. The evolution of the conversion and the
molar concentration of 4,6 DMDBT were plotted versus time. The
0.99. The pore distributions were determined by the BJH method.
To evaluate and analyze the strength and type of the acid
sites, pyridine adsorption on the solid samples was performed
on a 170-SX Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer in
◦
initial reaction rate (r ) was calculated by the slope of the tangent
the temperature range between 25 and 350 C. Before pyridine
0
◦
to the curve of 4,6 DMDBT concentration at zero time.
Previous experiments were performed in order to determine the
appropriate conditions and experimental devices (stirring speed,
temperature, particle size) in order to avoid reaction control by
either intraparticle or interfacial diffusion, in agreement with pub-
lished work [16].
adsorption, the samples were heated to 350 C under vacuum, and
then cooled to room temperature. Afterwards, the solid wafer was
exposed to pyridine, by breaking inside the spectrometer cell, a
capillary containing 50 ml of liquid pyridine. The IR spectra were
recorded at various conditions by increasing the cell temperature
◦
from 25 to 350 C. The quantitative calculation of Lewis acid sites
and Brönsted acid sites was made with respect to the integrated
−
1
area of the adsorption band at approximately 1450 and 1540 cm
,
3. Results and discussion
respectively. Integrated absorbance of each band is obtained using
the appropriate software. The acid strength was determined with
respect to the variation of the number of acid sites as a function of
the temperature.
3.1. Characterization
The XRD patterns of the calcined MCMR21, MCMR27, MCMR32
and MCMR60 (without Ga, Al-MCM-41) samples are typical of the
MCM-41 type materials (Fig. 1). The diffraction patterns showed
The MAS NMR experiments were carried out with a Bruker spec-
trometer ASX300, with a 4 mm probe. The frequencies used were
2
7
29
◦
7
8.21 MHz for Al and 59.63 MHz for Si and the MAS rates were
a reflection around 2ꢁ = 2.5 , corresponding to the (1 0 0) plane