catalytic activity observed was due, as in the case of cobalt-
containing zeolites, to the cobalt leaching into the reaction
medium. In spite of the very low concentration of dissolved
cobalt, an efficient catalysis was observed. This was not the
result of the formation, by dissolution of the solid, of a pecu-
liar species more active than cobalt(II) acetate. In fact, cobalt
acetate itself exhibited such an exceptional catalytic behaviour
at low concentration. A maximum in the catalytic activity of
cobalt(II) acetate was observed which was explained by the
catalysis of the autooxidation, followed by a phenomenon
similar to the so-called catalystÈinhibitor conversion already
known in non-polar media. At high concentration, the cataly-
sis certainly occurred by another mechanism like the direct
oxidation of cyclohexane by cobalt(III). Taking into account
the amount of dissolved cobalt, the increase in the oxidation
activity observed in this work in the presence of the CoAPO-5
catalyst and previously with Ðltrates of cobalt containing zeo-
lites, were in perfect agreement with the catalytic activity of
cobalt(II) acetate at the same low concentration levels. Thus,
cobalt molecular sieves did not act as heterogeneous catalysts,
but as distributors of adequate amounts of cobalt in the reac-
tion medium.
Fig. 4 Adipic : glutaric acid ratio as a function of cobalt concentra-
tion at a cyclohexane conversion of 15%
ROO~ ] RH ] ROOH ] R~
ROO~ ] Co(II) ] ROOCo(III)
If the cobaltic complex was stable and inactive, a termination
step would take place instead of a propagation step. This
could justify the conversion of the catalyst into inhibi-
tor.11,12,14
At the highest concentration levels ([3 mmol dm~3), the
catalysis was operating again and activity was directly con-
nected to the cobalt concentration. A direct attack of cyclo-
hexane by CoIII was proposed.2 The rate determining step
should be a one-electron transfer from the alkane to the tri-
valent cation which should be followed by fast proton loss.15c
From the present study, it seems difficult to Ðnd a heter-
ogeneous catalyst for the aerial oxidation of cyclohexane, at
least, as long as acetic acid remains the best solvent to
produce adipic acid.
References
1
2
3
4
R. A. Sheldon and J. Dakka, Catal. T oday, 1994, 19, 215.
K. Tanaka, Hydrocarbon Proc., 1974, 53, 114.
J. Kollar, W. O. Pat., 1993, 94.07833.
S. S. Lin and H. S. Weng, Appl. Catal. A, 1993, 105, 289; Appl.
Catal. A, 1994, 118, 21; J. Chem. Eng. Jpn, 1994, 27, 211.
B. Kraushaar-Czarnetzki and W. G. M. Hoogervorst, Eur. Pat.,
1992, 519.569.
D. L. Vanoppen, D. E. de Vos, M. J. Genet, P. G. Rouxhet and
P. A. Jacobs, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 560.
B. Kraushaar-Czarnetzki, W. G. M. Hoogervorst and W. H. J.
Stork, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1994, 84, 1869.
P. Conception, A. Corma, J. M. Lopez Nieto, J. Perez-Pariente,
Appl. Catal. A, 1996, 143, 17.
I. Belkhir, A. Germain, F. Fajula and E. Fache, Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal., 1997, 110, 577.
RH ] CoIII] RH~` ] CoII
RH~` ] R~ ] H`
5
6
7
8
9
Such a reaction did not occur with a manganese catalyst.16
This is in agreement with the lower electrochemical potential
of the MnII/MnIII redox couple.
The study of the adipic : glutaric acid ratio conÐrmed
changes in the mechanism. It was determined that glutaric
acid was not formed appreciably by degradation of adipic
acid, but was obtained directly during the ring opening, in
competition with adipic acid.18 So, variation of this ratio
would be a reÑection of changes in mechanism. The evolution
of this ratio, as a function of cobalt concentration for a cyclo-
hexane conversion of 15%, is shown in Fig. 4. At low concen-
tration of cobalt until 0.17 mmol dm~3, the ratio was close to
6, which is the value already determined by Hendry et al. for
the autooxidation of cyclohexane.19 Above 10 mmol dm~3,
the value was constant and equal to 9, emphasizing a single
mechanism. Between these two limits, the ratio was variable:
it was decreasing when the inhibition competed with the
autooxidation, reaching the lowest value (ca. 3) for the
minimum of activity and was increasing when the attack by
cobalt(III) competed with the inhibition.
10 R. A. Sheldon, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1997, 110, 151.
11 A. T. Betts and N. Uri, Makromol. Chem., 1966, 95, 22; Adv.
Chem. Ser., 1968, 76, 160.
12 D. G. Hendry and D. Schuetzle, Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Pet. Chem.,
Prepr., 1969, 14, A31.
13 J. F. Black, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 527.
14 N. M. Emanuel, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1974,
1010.
15 I. Belkhir, A. Germain, F. Fajula and E. Fache, Supported
Reagents and Catalysts in Chemistry, ed. B. K. Hodnett, A. P.
Kybett, H. H. Clark and K. Smith, The Royal Society of Chem-
istry, Cambridge, 1998, p. 48.
16 R. A. Sheldon and J. K. Kochi, in Metal-catalysed oxidations of
organic compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1981, (a) p. 46;
(b) p. 38; (c) p. 137.
17 F. Haber and J. Weiss, Proc. R. Soc. L ondon A, 1934, 147, 332.
18 J. D. Druliner, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 2069.
19 D. G. Hendry, C. W. Gould, D. Schuetzle, M. G. Syz and F. R.
Mayo, J. Org. Chem., 1976, 41, 1.
Conclusion
The study of the oxidation of cyclohexane in the presence of
CoAPO-5 molecular sieves as catalysts has shown that the
Paper 8/01245H; Received 12th February, 1998
1764
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1998, V ol. 94