Q. Xu et al.
Molecular Catalysis 497 (2020) 111224
Table 3
To get more insight into the dissociation hydrogen capacity of
a
Catalytic performance for hydrodeoxygenation over different reactants .
reduced samples, H
of H
-TPD was conducted. As shown in Fig. 9, the amount
2
◦
uptake in the range of 50ꢀ 400 C decreases gradually in the
Selectivity (%)
2
Reactants
Conv. (%)
following order: Ru-Co/C-500 > Ru-Co/C-600 > Ru-Co/C-700 > Co/C-
Benzene
CHOL
CHON
CHA
MCHDOL
6
00. Before TPD measurements, all Co-based samples were obtained by
anisole
72.4
97.8
100
7.2
0.7
0.5
22.5
97.3
99.2
0.5
1.8
0
26.9
1.3
42.9
0
◦
the reduction of H
and CO
2
above 500 C. Therefore, the possible release of CO
phenol
◦
2
from carbon supports in the range of 50ꢀ 500 C during H
2
-TPD
cyclohexanone
0.3
0
process for reduced Co-based samples can be neglected. Here, the
increased amount of H uptake demonstrates the improved capacity of
dissociation hydrogen, which originates from the enhanced dispersion
a
Reaction condition: 200 ℃; 1.0 MPa hydrogen pressure; 1.5 h.
2
◦
◦
of active Ru /Co sites, consistent with the decrease in the size of Co or
Ru-decorated Co NPs.
3
.2. Catalytic HDO performance of Ru-decorated Co-based catalysts
The catalytic HDO reactions over different supported Co-based cat-
◦
alysts were conducted under 1.0 MPa hydrogen pressure at 200 C. As
presented in Fig. 10A, the catalytic activities of Ru-Co/C catalysts are
remarkably better than that of Co/C-600 catalyst under the same reac-
tion conditions. Especially, Ru-Co/C-600 catalyst delivers a guaiacol
conversion of 79.2 % after a reaction of 0.5 h, with a cyclohexanol
(
CHOL) selectivity of 78.4 %. In striking contrast, Co/C-600 catalyst
delivers much lower conversion of guaiacol (24.3 %) and cyclohexanol
selectivity (59.8 %). Apparently, the introduction of a small amount of
Ru (0.48 wt %) can greatly improve the catalytic HDO activity of Ru-Co/
C-600, which mainly originates from the increased amount of active
metallic sites responsible for the dissociation of molecular hydrogen.
Meanwhile, compared with Ru-Co/C-600, Ru-Co/C-700 catalyst ex-
hibits a slightly reduced activity, probably due to the presence of larger
metal particles. On the other side, over the Ru-Co/C-600, the conversion
and product selectivities changed with the reaction time (Fig.10B). The
guaiacol conversion rapidly increases within 90 min. Meanwhile, the
cyclohexanol selectivity increases gradually, and the phenol selectivity
decreases to zero. After a reaction of 3 h, the guaiacol conversion and
the cyclohexanol selectivity reach about 99.6 % and 94.1 %, respec-
tively. It demonstrates that the processes from guaiacol to phenol and
from phenol to cyclohexanol are consecutive reactions. In general, even
though previously reported Ru-containing catalysts with much higher
loading amounts (above 5%) are effective for the HDO of guaiacol [48,
Fig. 11. The change of TOF value of guaiacol converted over different cata-
◦
lysts. Reaction conditions: 200 C, 1.0 MPa hydrogen pressure, and 5 min.
4
0
9], our Ru-Co/C catalyst systems with the much lower Ru loading of
.48 % exhibit high activity, limiting the use of precious metal by
incorporating with a cheaper transition metal Co.
Further, anisole was used as the substrate to study the HDO reaction
process over the present Ru-Co/C-600 catalyst (Table 3, entry 1). It is
seen that no phenol is produced at 200 ℃ and 1.0 MPa after a reaction of
1
.5 h, along with a small cyclohexanol selectivity of 22.5 %. However, as
a result of hydrogenation-isomerization and dehydration reactions
promoted by weak acidic sites on the catalyst surface [50], anisole also
can be converted to a large amount of (cis- and trans-)1-methyl-1,
2
-cyclohexanediol (MCHDOL) or cyclohexanone (CHON). Meanwhile,
the product distributions using phenol as the substrate is consistent with
those using guaiacol as the substrate (Table 3, entry 2). In two cases of
anisole and guaiacol as substrates, phenolic hydroxyl can be hydro-
deoxygenated to produce benzene. Furthermore, cyclohexanone used as
the substrate can be easily converted into cyclohexanol under the same
reaction conditions (Table 3, entry 3). The above results illustrate that
the direct removal of the methoxy group from guaiacol is the first step of
the HDO process.
Fig. 12. In situ FT-IR spectra of anisole adsorbed on different Ru-Co/C catalysts
at room temperature.
surface of Ru-Co/C-600 sample.
In order to further confirm the presence of surface defective struc-
tures, Raman spectra of supported Co-based samples were analyzed. As
displayed in Fig. 8, five Raman peaks (186, 470, 511, 599, and
70 cmꢀ ) are assigned to F 12 g, E2 g
1
2
3
6
F2 g, F2 g, and A1g vibrations of Co O
3 4
1
In addition, the turnover frequency (TOF) for guaiacol conversion
was calculated based on the moles of converted guaiacol per mole sur-
in spinel structure [45], respectively. Specifically, two F2 g and A1g vi-
brations are broadened and red-shift with the elevated reduction tem-
perature, as well as the introduction of Ru, clearly demonstrating the
face metallic sites determined by the H
min, in order to identify the intrinsic catalytic HDO activity of
different catalysts. Notably, the TOF values over Ru-containing catalysts
2
-TPD results after a reaction of
5
3 4
enhanced defective structure of Co O phase [46], due to the formation
of more oxygen vacancies. Such surface oxygen vacancies are thought to
be conducive to the adsorption and activation of oxygen-containing
functional groups in phenolic compounds in the HDO reaction [47].
ꢀ 1
are larger than that over the Co/C-600 (0.35 s ) (Fig. 11). Especially,
the TOF value over the Ru-Co/C-700 catalyst reaches as high as 4.416
ꢀ 1
ꢀ 1
s
, which is much higher than those over Ru-Co/C-500 (0.517 s ) and
7