S. Biswas et al.
Inorganica Chimica Acta 515 (2021) 120096
2. Experimental
Table 1
Crystallographic data for [Rh(PPh3)(L)Cl2] (1).
2.1. Materials
Formula
C30H24Cl2N2PRhS
Formula Weight
Crystal System
Space group
a / Å
649.35
2-(Benzylthio)-N-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)aniline (L-CH2Ph) was
synthesized following the published procedure [32]. Pyridine-2-
carboxaldehyde, 2-aminothiophenol and RhCl3⋅3H2O were purchased
from Sigma Aldrich, and used as received. All other chemicals and sol-
vents were of reagent grade and were used without further purification.
Monoclinic
C2/c
33.096(3)
11.0554(8)
17.9101(14)
114.662(4)
5955.4(8)
8
b / Å
c / Å
β (◦)
V / Å3
Z
2.2. Physical measurements
ρcalcd / g cmꢀ 3
1.448
μ
/ mmꢀ 1
0.898
Microanalyses (C, H, N) were performed using a Perkin-Elmer CHN-
2400 elemental analyzer. Electronic spectra were measured on Lambda
750 PerkinElmer spectrophotometer in dichloromethane solution. IR
spectra were recorded on RX-1 Perkin Elmer spectrophotometer in the
spectral range 4000–400 cmꢀ 1 with the samples in the form of KBr
pellets. Luminescence property was measured using Shimadzu RF-6000
fluorescence spectrophotometer at room temperature (298 K) in aceto-
nitrile solution by 1 cm path length quartz cell. Fluorescence lifetimes
were measured using a time-resolved spectrofluorometer from IBH, UK.
The instrument uses a picoseconds diode laser (NanoLed-03, 370 nm) as
the excitation source and works on the principle of time-correlated
single photon counting [33]. The goodness of fit was evaluated by χ2
criterion and visual inspection of the residuals of the fitted function to
the data. 1H NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on Bruker 300 MHz
FT-NMR spectrometers in presence of TMS as internal standard. Cyclic
voltammograms were recorded using CHI Electrochemical workstation.
A platinum wire working electrode, a platinum wire auxiliary electrode
and Ag/AgCl reference electrode were used in a standard three-electrode
configuration. Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (NBu4PF6)
(0.1 M) was used as the supporting electrolyte and the scan rate used
was 50 mV sꢀ 1 in CH2Cl2 under N2 atmosphere. ESI mass spectra were
recorded on a micro mass Q-TOF mass spectrometer. The one electron
oxidized species 1þ was generated by exhaustive electrolysis of 1 [34].
The luminescence quantum yield was determined using carbazole as
reference with a known ϕR of 0.42 in MeCN. The complex and the
reference dye were excited at the same wavelength, maintaining nearly
equal absorbance (~0.1), and the emission spectra were recorded. The
area of the emission spectrum was integrated using the software avail-
able in the instrument and the quantum yield is calculated according to
the following equation:
T / K
293(2)
Radiation / Å
hkl range
0.71073
ꢀ 42 to 42; ꢀ 14 to 14; –23 to 23
2624
F(000)
θ range (◦)
Reflection collected
1.963–27.546
49,862
Unique reflns (Rint
)
6864
Observed data (I > 2
σ
(I))
6044
Data/restraints/parameters
6864 / 0 / 334
0.0238, 0.0593
1.034
R1a,wR2b[I > 2
σ(I)]
GOFc
Largest diff. Peak/hole, / e Å─3
0.543 and ꢀ 0.489
∑
∑
a
R1
=
|(|Fo| – |Fc|)| /
|Fo|.
∑
∑
wR2 = {
[w (F2o–F2c)2] /
[w (F2o)2] }1/2, w = 1/[σ2(F2o) + (0.0303P)2
+
b
5.6657P], where P = (F2o + 2Fc2)/3.
∑
GOF = { [w(F2o–Fc2)2] / (n–p)}1/2 , where n = number of measured data and
c
p = number of parameters.
ethyl acetate-petroleum ether mixture. After removal of the solvent
under reduced pressure, the solid pure green product was further dried
under vacuum. Yield, 0.155 g (63%).
Anal. Calc. for C30H24N2Cl2PRhS: Calculated C, 55.49; H, 3.37; N,
4.31 Found: C, 55.35; H, 3.65; N, 4.55. IR (KBr, υmax/cmꢀ 1): 1584
1
–
–
(C N), 747 (S C). H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 8.78 (1H, s, CH = N), 8.66
–
(1H, d, J = 4.4 Hz), 8.43 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.83 (1H, m), 7.12–7.52
(20H, m). ESI-MS (m/z) calculated for C30H24N2ClPRhS [Mꢀ Cl]+
613.0141, found 613.0157. 13C{ H} NMR (CDCl , ppm): 171.2 (C N),
1
–
–
3
152.1 (Ar-C), 148.3 (Ar-C), 146.4 (Ar-C), 138.3 (PPh3-C), 132.4 (PPh3-
CH), 129.4 (PPh3-CH), 126.3 (Ar-C), 123.8 (Ar-C). 31P{1H} NMR
(CDCl3, ppm): 29.7 (d, 1JRhꢀ P = 116.8 Hz, PPh3). UV–Vis (in CH2Cl2),
λmax
(
ε
, Mꢀ 1cmꢀ 1): 650 (1230), 333 (8751), 267 (25328). E1/2 : 0.68 V
(ΔE = 88 mV) (Epa: 0.724 V Epc: 0.636 V); Epc: ꢀ 1.09 V.
ϕS/ϕR = [AS / AR ] × [(Abs)R /(Abs)S ] × [ηS2
/
ηR2
]
Here, ϕS and ϕR are the luminescence quantum yield of the sample
and reference, respectively. AS and AR are the area under the emission
spectra of the sample and the reference respectively, (Abs)S and (Abs)R
are the respective optical densities of the sample and the reference so-
lution at the wavelength of excitation, and ηS and ηR are the values of
refractive index for the respective solvent used for the sample and
reference.
2.4. Procedure for catalytic transfer hydrogenation
In a typical experiment the ketone (2 mmol), KOH (0.02 mmol), and
complex 1 (0.005 mmol) were added to degassed iPrOH (5 mL), and the
mixture was stirred at 80 ◦C in an inert atmosphere for 6 h. The reaction
was then monitored at various time intervals by the use of GC. After the
reaction was complete, iPrOH was removed on a rotary evaporator, and
the resulting semisolid was extracted with diethyl ether (5 × 5 mL). The
combined liquid phase was analyzed by GC using undecane as an in-
ternal standard.
The yields of catalytic conversion were determined by GC instrument
equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) using a HP–5 column of
30 m length, 0.53 mm diameter and 5.00
μ
m film thickness. The column,
◦
injector and detector temperatures were 200, 250 and 250 C respec-
tively. The carrier gas was N2 (UHP grade) at a flow rate of 30 mL/min.
The injection volume of sample was 2 μL. The oxidation products were
2.5. Computational Details
identified by GC co-injection with authentic samples.
Full geometry optimization of complex 1 was carried out by DFT/
B3LYP method [35,36]. All elements except rhodium were assigned the
6-31G(d) basis set. For Rh, LanL2DZ basis set with effective core po-
tential was employed [37–39]. The vibrational frequency calculation
was performed to ensure that the optimized geometry represents the
local minima and there are only positive eigenvalues. All calculations
were performed with Gaussian09 program package [40] with the aid of
the GaussView visualization program. Vertical electronic excitations
based on B3LYP optimized geometry were computed using the time-
2.3. Preparation of [Rh(PPh3)(L)Cl2] (1)
The reaction mixture containing RhCl3⋅3H2O (0.10 g, 0.38 mmol), L-
CH2Ph (0.101 g, 0.38 mmol) and PPh3 (0.262 g, 1 mmol) in 20 mL
acetonitrile was refluxed for 8 h to yield a deep green solution. The
solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The dried crude
product was purified by using silica gel (mesh 60–120) column chro-
matography. The green band of the complex was eluted by 30% (v/v)
2