3162
S. P. Chavan, P. Soni / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 3161–3162
Table 1. Deprotection of oximes
of reactivity was observed with phenolic t-butyl dimethyl
silyl ether. To demonstrate the chemoselectivity of this
reagent we prepared the TBDMS ether (entry 1). We
were able to selectively deprotect the oxime group
without affecting the TBDMS group in an excellent yield.
Entry
Substrate
Product
Time (h)
Yield (%)
NOH
CHO
1
1
96
OMe
Thus this method could be used to selectively deprotect
oximes in the presence of a TBDMS ether in a multi-
functional compound.
OMe
OTBDMS
OTBDMS
O
NOH
In conclusion, this paper describes the use of glyoxylic
acid for the chemoselective deprotection of oximes in an
aqueous medium. The advantages of this method are the
ease of work up, the observed selectivity and the use of
environmentally benign reagent that is easy to handle
and is inexpensive.
2
3
4
1
94
94
95
OH
OH
NOH
CHO
1.2
NO2
NO2
Acknowledgements
NOH
CHO
One of the authors P.B.S. thanks CSIR, New Delhi for
financial support. Funding from CSIR, New Delhi un-
der YSA (SPC) scheme is gratefully acknowledged.
1
OMe
O
OMe
NOH
5
6
1
1
94
94
References and notes
1. Greene, T. W. Protecting Groups In Organic Synthesis;
Wiley Interscience: New York, 1981.
NOH
O
2. Maloney, J. R.; Lyle, R. E. Synthesis 1978, 212.
3. Barhate, N. B.; Gajare, A. S.; Wakharkar, R. D.; Sudalai,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 653–656.
4. Yadav, J. S.; Sasmal, P. K.; Chand, P. K. Synth. Commun.
1999, 2, 3667–3671.
5. Hajipour, A. R.; Mahboubghah, N. OPPIBRIEFS 1999,
31, 112.
6. Lee, J. G.; Kwak, K. H.; Hawang, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 6677–6680.
7. Donaldson, R. E.; Saddler, J. C.; Byren, S. J. Org. Chem.
1983, 48, 2167–2168.
8. Corey, E. J.; Hopkins, P. B.; Kim, S.; Yoo, S.; Nambiar,
K. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7131–7135.
9. Varma, R. S.; Meshram, H. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
5427–5428.
10. Boruah, A.; Baruah, B.; Prajapati, D.; Sandhu, J. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4267–4268.
11. Geneste, F.; Racelma, N.; Moradpour, A. Synth. Com-
mun. 1997, 27, 957.
12. Timmes, G. H.; Wildsmith, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12,
195–198.
13. Olah, G. A.; Arvanaghi, M.; Prakash, G. K. S. Synthesis
1980, 220.
14. Corey, E. J.; Enders, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 17, 3–6.
15. Enders, D.; Elchenauer, H.; Babus, U.; Schubert, H.;
Kermer, K. A. M. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1345–1359.
16. Ulven, T.; Carlsen, P. H. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 3971–
3972.
NOH
O
7
8
1.5
1.5
93
92
NOH
NOH
O
O
9
1.5
90
92
NOH
CHO
10
11
1
O
O
O
O
No reaction
1.5
3
OTBDMS
All compounds are characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy.
17. Susant, S.; Manas, B. K.; Frederick, B. F.; Bimal, B. K.
Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 1917.
18. Balalaie, S.; Salimi, S. H.; Sharifi, A. Indian J. Chem. 2001,
40B, 1251, and references cited therein.
19. Depuy, C. H.; Ponder, B. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81,
4629–4631.
and required no additional purification. The results of
this study are summarized in Table 1.
20. Hershbeg, E. B. J. Org. Chem. 1948, 13, 542–548.
21. Chavan, S. P.; Soni, P. B.; Kamat, S. K. Synlett 2001,
1251–1253.
Oximes derived from aromatic as well as simple ketones
were smoothly deprotected at room temperature. Lack