1
,1-Dimethyl-3-phenyltriazene
1231
HPLC m easurem en ts were perform ed in an isocratic system con sistin g of a m odel 2250
serial dual piston pum p, 4110 VarioTh erm colum n th erm ostat, DG-1310 solven t degasser
an d Lam bda 1010 UV-VIS spectroph otom etric detector with a flow cell optical path len gth
of 10 m m an d volum e 10 µl (all from Bisch off Ch rom atograph y Gm bH, Germ an y).
A Rh eodyn e 7725i sam ple in jector with 10 µl sam ple loop (Rh eodyn e LLC, U.S.A.) was used.
Th e reversed-ph ase colum n Pron toSil C18 AQ with th e pore size 200 Å an d particle size of
5
µm was used (Bisch off Ch rom atograph y Gm bH, Germ an y). As suitable m obile ph ase, a
–
1
m ixture of aqueous 0.1 m ol l sodium acetate with m eth an ol (6 + 4) was used; th e flow rate
was 0.3 m l m in –1. Th e UV detection was perform ed at 278 as well as at 230 n m .
A Metroh m 744 pH m eter (Metroh m Ltd., Switzerlan d) equipped with a com bin ed glass
pH electrode an d tem perature sen sor was used for pH m easurem en ts.
Procedures
Mixed BR buffer–m eth an ol m edium was used as th e supportin g electrolyte in order to en -
sure th e solubility of th e in vestigated substan ce. Th e actual pH of th e BR buffer–m eth an ol
m ixture (1 + 1) was m easured with a com bin ed pH electrode calibrated usin g acetate, borate
1
3
an d ph osph ate buffers in 50% m eth an ol . Th e pH value of th e BR buffer–m eth an ol m ixture
con tain in g 10 vol.% of m eth an ol was m easured with a pH electrode calibrated usin g aque-
1
4
ous buffers
.
A 10-m l aliquot of an appropriate supportin g electrolyte solution was placed in a voltam -
m etric cell an d deaerated for 5 m in with n itrogen . Th e voltam m etric cell was flush ed with
n itrogen passed successively th rough a solution of ch rom ium (II) ion s in dilute h ydroch loric
acid con tain in g h eavily am algam ated zin c gran ules, distilled water, m olecular sieves an d,
fin ally, th rough a solution h avin g th e sam e solven t an d supportin g electrolyte com position
as th e test solution . After recordin g th e baselin e, th e required am oun ts of th e stock solution
of th e in vestigated substan ce were added an d th e polarogram s or voltam m ogram s were re-
corded.
Th e calibration curves were m easured in triplicate an d evaluated by th e least-square lin ear
regression m eth od. Th e determ in ation lim it was calculated as ten tim es th e stan dard devia-
tion for ten determ in ation s of th e an alyte at a con cen tration correspon din g to th e lowest
1
5
poin t of th e appropriate calibration graph
.
In th e coulom etric determ in ation of th e n um ber of electron s exch an ged, 20 m l of th e
supportin g electrolyte were placed in th e coulom etric cell an d bubbled with n itrogen , with
sim ultan eous in itiation of pre-electrolysis at a selected con stan t poten tial. After about
2
0 m in , wh en th e residual curren t value dropped below 0.1 m A an d n o lon ger ch an ged, th e
circuit param eters were adjusted for autom atic residual curren t com pen sation . An aliquot of
th e stock solution of th e tested substan ce was th en added an d reduction was carried out at a
con stan t poten tial with con stan t stirrin g an d bubblin g with n itrogen . Th e electrolysis was
term in ated wh en th e curren t decreased to th e residual value an d th e passed ch arge was de-
term in ed by electron ic in tegration . Th e reduction was also followed spectroph otom etrically,
polarograph ically an d ch rom atograph ically. In th e m easurem en ts, th e sam ples were taken
prior to start of th e coulom etric reduction an d after reduction of 25, 50, 75 an d 100% of th e
triazen e.
All th e m easurem en ts were perform ed at laboratory tem perature (20 ± 1 °C).
Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2007, Vol. 72, No. 9, pp. 1229–1243