984
G. Turan-Zitouni et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 43 (2008) 981e985
(3H, s, CH3), 2.70e2.90 (4H, br, protons C1 and C3 of indane),
6.50 (1H, br, NH), 7.40e8.30 (8H, m, aromatic protons). For
C20H18N4O2S calculated: 63.47% C, 4.79% H, 14.80% N;
found: 63.55% C, 4.84% H, 14.91% N. MS-FABþ: m/z: 379
[M þ 1].
5.3. Toxicity
5.3.1. Cell culture and drug treatment
NIH/3T3 cells were obtained from the American Type Cul-
ture Collection (ATCC, USA). The cells were incubated in
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented
with 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, UK), 100 IU/ml
penicillin (Gibco, Paisley, Scotland) and 100 mg/ml streptomy-
cin (Gibco) at 37 ꢁC in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air
and 5% CO2. Exponentially growing cells were plated at
5 ꢃ 104 cells/ml into 96-well microtiter tissue culture plates
(Nunc, Denmark) and incubated for 24 h before the addition
of the drugs (the optimum cell number for cytotoxicity assays
was determined in preliminary experiments). Stock solutions
of compounds were prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide
(DMSO; SigmaeAldrich, Poole, UK) and further dilutions
were made with fresh culture medium (the concentration of
DMSO in the final culture medium was <0.6% which had
no effect on the cell viability).
5.1.2.5. N-(1-(4-Chlorophenyl)ethylidene)-N0-[4-(indan-5-yl)
thiazol-2-yl]hydrazone (3e). 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 1.90e2.10 (2H, pentaplet, protons C2 of indane),
2.80 (3H, s, CH3), 2.80e2.95 (4H, q, protons C1 and C3 of
indane), 6.85 (1H, br, NH), 7.25 (1H, s, indane C4 proton),
7.30 (1H, d, J ¼ 7.37 Hz, indane C7 proton), 7.50 (2H, d,
J ¼ 8.63 Hz, phenyl C2 and C6 protons), 7.65 (1H, d,
J ¼ 7.49 Hz, indane C6 proton), 7.75 (1H, s, thiazole C5 pro-
ton), 7.80 (2H, d, J ¼ 8.64 Hz, phenyl C3 and C5 protons).
For C20H18ClN3S calculated: 65.30% C, 4.93% H, 11.42%
N; found: 65.29% C, 4.99% H, 11.54% N. MS-FABþ: m/z:
367 [M], 368 [M þ 1], 369 [M þ 2].
5.1.2.6. N-(1-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)ethylidene)-N0-[4-(indan-5-
yl)thiazol-2-yl]hydrazone (3f). 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-
d6) d (ppm): 1.95e2.10 (2H, pentaplet, protons C2 of indane),
2.35 (3H, s, CH3), 2.70e2.95 (4H, q, protons C1 and C3 of in-
dane), 6.40 (1H, br, NH), 7.20e8.00 (7H, m, aromatic pro-
tons). For C20H17Cl2N3S calculated: 59.71% C, 4.26% H,
10.44% N; found: 59.89% C, 4.43% H, 10.59% N. MS-
FABþ: m/z: 401 [M], 402 [M þ 1], 403[M þ 2].
5.3.2. Cell culture and drug treatment
It is widely used as a measure of cytotoxicity. After 24 h of
preincubation, the tested compounds were added to give final
concentration in the range of 1.56e200 mg/ml and the cells
were incubated for 24 h. At the end of this period, MTT was
added to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and the cells
were incubated for 4 h at 37 ꢁC. After the medium was re-
moved, the formazan crystals formed by MTT metabolism
were solubilized by addition of 200 ml DMSO to each well
and absorbance was read at 540 nm with a microtitre plate
spectrophotometer (Elx808-IU Bio-Tek plate reader). Every
concentration was repeated in three wells and IC50 values
were defined as the drug concentrations that reduced absor-
bance to 50% of control values.
5.2. Biology
5.2.1. BACTEC radiometric method of susceptibility testing
Inocula for susceptibility testing were either from a posi-
tive BACTEC isolation vial with a growth index (GI) of 500
more, or suspension of organism isolated earlier on conven-
tional medium. The culture was mixed well with a syringe
and 0.1 ml of a positive BACTEC culture was added to
each of the vials containing the test drugs. The drug vials
contained rifampicin (0.25 mg/ml). A control vial was inoc-
ulated with a 1:100 microdilution of the culture. A suspen-
sion equivalent to a McFarland No. 1 standard was prepared
in the same manner as a BACTEC positive vial, when
growth from a solid medium was used. Each vial was tested
immediately on a BACTEC instrument to provide CO2 in
the headspace. The vials were incubated at 37 ꢁC and tested
daily with a BACTEC instrument. When the GI in the
control read at least 30, the increase in GI (DGI) from
the previous day in the control was compared with that in
the drug vial. The following formula was used to interpret
results:
Data presentation and statistics. Statistical analyses were
carried out by the one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA)
test and criterion of the differences between means (ꢂSEM)
was P < 0.05.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to the Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Ac-
quisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF) in USA for the
in vitro evaluation of antimycobacterial activity.
References
May 2006.
[2] Y. Zhang, K. Post-Martens, S. Denkin, Drug Discov. Today 11 (1e2)
(2006) 21e27.
DGI control > DGI drug ¼ Susceptible
DGI control < DGI drug ¼ Resistant
[3] K. Duncan, C.E. Barry, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7 (2004) 460e465.
[4] A. Imramovsky, S. Polanc, J. Vinsova, M. Kocevar, J. Jampilek,
Z. Reckova, J. Kaustova, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007) 2551e2559.
[5] Global Alliance for Tuberculosis Drug Development, Scientific blueprint
for TB drug development, Tuberculosis 81 (Suppl.) (2001) 1e52.
[6] Y. Zhang, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 45 (2005) 529.
If a clear susceptibility pattern (the difference of DGI of
control and the drug bottle) was not seen at the time the con-
trol DGI is 30, the vials were read for 1 or 2 additional days to
establish a definite pattern of DGI differences.
˘
[7] B.K. Kaymakc¸ioglu, S. Rollas, Il Farmaco 57 (2002) 595e599.