In the photooxidation of SRB, different final photooxi-
dation products (as verified experimentally by UV-vis, H
structures are preceded by generation of carbon-centered
radical (12, 13). Consistent with these, degradation of SRB
must occur via two different photooxidation pathways
(destruction of the chromophore structure and N-de-
ethylation) due to formation of different radicals (either
carbon-centered radicals or nitrogen-centered radicals).
There is no doubt that electron injection from the dye to the
conduction band of TiO2 yields dye cation radicals, a process
which is determined by the nature of the HOMO orbitals of
the excited dye, 1,3dye*. After this step, the cation radical,
dye•+, can undergo hydrolysis and/ or deprotonation. Because
these two processes are sensitive to the molecular surround-
ings, the question as to which radical is formed (carbon-
centered radicals or nitrogen-centered radicals) is dictated
by the nature of the different hydrolysis or deprotonation
pathways of the dye cation radicals, which in turn are
determined by the different adsorption modes of SRB on the
TiO2 particle surface.
1
NMR, IR, and GC-MS) arise, no doubt, from different
photooxidation pathways, which are seeming defined by two
entirely different adsorption modes. Under our experimental
conditions (pH 2.5), the positively charged surface of the
TiO2 particles in the SRB/ TiO2 system permits SRB to be
chemisorbed strongly on TiO2 through the sulfonate groups
by electrostatic forces because the presence of two sulfonic
acid groups in the dye molecule ensures its existence in the
form of a singly charged anion in aqueous solutions within
the pH range 2-12 (17). When the SRB dye adsorbs on the
TiO2 surface through sulfonate groups then (Scheme 1a),
cleavage of the SRB chromophore structure seems to
predominate. By contrast, N-de-ethylation occurs only to a
slight extent. The predominant final products were diethyl-
amine and carbon dioxide. Other (minor) products detected
were N-ethylacetamide, N-ethylformamide, N,N-diethylacet-
amide, N,N-diethylformamide, formic acid, and acetaldehyde
(from incomplete de-ethylation).
On the basis of all the above experimental results (different
photooxidation products depend on the different adsorption
modes), we tentatively propose the two photooxidation
pathways depicted in Scheme 1a,b distinguished by the
different adsorption modes. In the first (Scheme 1a), the
excited dye in the SRB/ TiO2 system is adsorbed to the particle
surface through the sulfonate group. Electron injection to
the conduction band of TiO2 produces the dye radical cations,
after which either nucleophilic interactions between SRB•+
and H2O or deprotonation occur to produce neutral carbon-
centered radicals. The location of the radical in the otherwise
complex dye structure then becomes the point of attack by
adsorbed molecular oxygen (see Scheme 1a) leading to a
sequence of complex reactions: rapid decomposition via
cleavage of the ring rupture and further oxidative reactions
to yield a multitude of products. Consequently, cleavage of
the SRB chromophore structure predominates with the main
products being diethylamine and carbon dioxide; de-ethyl-
ation is a smaller process which yields the minor components
N-ethylacetamide, N-ethylformamide, and acetaldehyde.
In a previous study (15), we established an adsorption
model for the anionic surfactant DBS on the surface of TiO2
particles at different pHs by measurement of the ú-potential
of TiO2 particles. Anionic DBS molecules are easily adsorbed
on the positively charged TiO2 surface under acidic conditions
(pH 2.5) through the negative sulfonate groups owing to
electrostatic effects. This results in a drop of the ú-potential
of TiO2 particles from 55 mV to -20 mV at the DBS critical
micellar concentration of 1.2 mM (cmc). The physical location
of the SRB in SRB/ DBS/ TiO2 system was evidenced by the
fluorescence spectral changes of SRB in different media.
It is well-known that the fluorescence maxima of organic
compounds are sensitive to the polarity of the solvent (21);
that is, the more polar the solvent is the more the fluorescence
maximum of the organic compound shifts to the red. When
DBS (1.2 mM) was added to an SRB (5 × 10-7 M) solution
(pH 2.5), the maximum absorbance of SRB increased
suggesting that the presence of DBS helps to separate the
aggregated SRB molecules, whereas the red shift of the
fluorescence maximum of SRB shows that SRB interacts
strongly with DBS; note that the environment formed by
DBS is surely more polar than neat water. On the other hand,
the maximum absorbance of SRB also shifted red concomi-
tant with SRB fluorescence quenching after addition of
colloidal TiO2 (5 × 10-3 M) to an SRB solution. However,
when TiO2 was added to the SRB/ DBS system, except for
some fluorescence quenching, there was no shift of the
fluorescence maximum of SRB compared with that in the
TiO2-free system. This infers that the SRB molecules are
located, to some extent, far from the TiO2 surface in the SRB/
DBS/ TiO2 system (see Scheme 1b), so that the TiO2 surface
has little influence on the shift of the fluorescence maximum
of SRB. On addition of the anionic DBS surfactant, it results
that the SRB dye can adsorb to the negative TiO2/ DBS
interface only through the positively charged diethylamine
groups owing to favorable electrostatic interactions.
In the second pathway (Scheme 1b), the dye molecule in
the SRB/ DBS/ TiO2 system is adsorbed through the positively
charged diethylamine function. Following electron injection
from the excited dye to the TiO2 particle surface and
subsequent hydrolysis (or deprotonation) yields a nitrogen-
centered radical, which is subsequently attacked by molecular
oxygen to lead ultimately to de-ethylation. The mono-de-
ethylated dye, SRB1, can also be excited by visible light and
be implicated in other similar events (electron injection,
hydrolysis or deprotonation, and oxygen attack) to yield a
bi-de-ethylated dye derivative, SRB2. The de-ethylation
process as described above continues until formation of the
completely de-ethylated dye, SRB4 (see UV-visible spectral
results in Figure 1b). When SRB4 is excited by visible light,
the subsequent transformation of the carbon-centered cation
radicals generates formamide, acetamide, and formic acid
products as confirmed by the GC-MS results of Figure 4b.
When the SRB dye molecules are located near the TiO2
surface through the diethylamine group and assisted by the
negative ends of the DBS molecules (cmc: 1.2 mM) (Scheme
1b), which de facto neutralize somewhat the surface, the
N-de-ethylation process predominates during the initial
stages. Destruction of the chromophore ring structure occurs
mostly only after full de-ethylation of the dye. The final
products were acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide (major
products) along with formamide, formic acid, and acetamide
as the minor products.
Acknowledgments
The generous financial support of this work from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 29677019, No.
29725715, and No. 29637010), the Foundation of the Chinese
Academy of Sciences, and the China National Committee
for Science and Technology is gratefully acknowledged. The
work in Tokyo is sponsored by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education (No.
10640569 to H.H.) and in Montreal by a grant from the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (No.
A5443 to N.S.). Finally, the authors thank the reviewers for
valuable and useful suggestions on the proposed mechanism.
According to earlier reports (22-24), most oxidative N-de-
alkylation processes are preceded by formation of nitrogen-
centered radical, whereas destruction of dye chromophore
9
VOL. 34, NO. 18, 2000 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 3 9 8 9