reactions in the absence of added ligands but also lead to
excellent yields of product.
behavior suggests that the rate acceleration is not simply due
to a very efficient initial reduction of Pd(II) to the active
Pd(0) catalyst. Instead, it appears that the current passed
continually maintains a higher level of active catalyst than
found in the absence of current. At this time, the exact role
of the current in the reactions is not known. However, it is
thought that the concentration of active catalyst in ligand-
free Heck reactions is reduced by the aggregation of unstable
Our study of these reactions began by examining the
generality of the electrolysis conditions developed for the
chip-based reactions. This was accomplished by coupling
iodobenzene to a series of electron-poor, electron-rich, and
conjugated olefins (Table 1). The electrolysis reactions
8
Pd(0) clusters to form catalytically inactive precipitates. One
plausible explanation for the role of the current in the
reactions is that the clusters being formed are broken up by
the oxidation of Pd(0) to Pd(II) at the anode (the reactions
Table 1. Use of Aryliodide Substrates
9
are run in an undivided cell). Rereduction of the Pd(II)
species at the cathode then effectively recycles the palladium
back into catalytically active Pd(0) species. The net result is
a steady state of active catalyst.
From a practical standpoint, the compatibility of the
reactions with the redox cycle and the presence of a steady-
state concentration of Pd(0) is very important because it
allows for the use of a simple constant current reaction setup.
In a constant current reduction, the potential of the cathode
climbs after the electrolysis substrate is consumed, a
development that can lead to the reduction of electron-poor
products and a decrease in product yield. However, in the
case of the redox cycle described above, the reaction never
runs out of Pd(II) substrate and the potential at the cathode
remains constant for the entire duration of the experiment.
Hence, there is no risk of reducing the Heck reaction product
and no need to regulate the potential at the cathode.
time electricity
yield (%)
entrya
R′
R
(h)
(F/mol)
(trans/cis)
1a
1b
2a
2b
3a
3b
4a
4b
5a
5b
6a
6b
7a
7b
8a
8b
9a
9b
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
CO
CO
Ph
Ph
CONH
CONH
n-C
n-C
CN
CN
OEt
OEt
2
Me
Me
16
2.5
18
4
none
1.22
none
1.33
none
1.57
none
1.47
none
1.37
none
1.06
none
1.78
none
0.91
none
1.26
85 (trans only)
89 (trans only)
84 (trans only)
87 (trans only)
81 (trans only)
84 (trans only)
74 (4.2/1)
2
2
16
3
2
8
H
H
16CO
16CO
2
Me
Me
18
3.5
16
2.5
12
2
8
2
84 (4.2/1)
80 (3.4/1)
82 (3.4/1)
70 (4.6/1)
78 (4.6/1)
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
2
2
2
2
2
2
Me CO
Me CO
2
CH
CH
2
-pyrene 18
78 (12/1)
2
2
-pyrene
4
18
2
84 (12/1)
Me CONH
Me CONH
Me Ph
2
80 (trans only)
85 (trans only)
80 (trans only)
88 (trans only)
2
The ability to run the reactions using constant current
conditions means that the experiments are compatible with
the use of a readily available 6-V lantern battery as the power
18
3
Me Ph
a
a ) no current; b ) 15 mA.
1
0,11
supply (Scheme 1).
Although the use of a battery does
utilized 15 mA of current, reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC)
anodes and cathodes, and an undivided cell. In each case,
passing current through the cell led to more than a 4.5-fold
increase in the rate of the Heck reaction. In the best case
Scheme 1
(entry 8a vs entry 8b), a 9-fold increase in rate was observed.
The rate acceleration was not changed by the presence of
an electron-withdrawing group on the aryliodide (entry 7-9)
or the use of a platinum cathode.
When the reaction utilized in entry 7b was performed using
a platinum cathode, the reaction proceeded in 3 h and
generated an 82% isolated yield of product. In each example
studied, the yield for the electrochemically assisted reaction
was slightly higher than the yield for the nonelectrochemical
reaction. The product stereochemistry obtained from the
reactions was the same for both electrochemical and non-
electrochemical reactions.
The increased reaction rate required passing current
through the cell for the entire duration of the experiment.
When current was passed for 1 h through a cell containing
the substrates for reaction 7b and then stopped, the Heck
reaction took 14 h to reach completion. The reaction was
lead to a lower yield of product (compare with Table 1, entry
b), the success of the reaction makes it clear that the utility
1
(
(
8) Reetz, M. R.; de Vries, J. G. Chem. Commun. 2004, 35, 1559
9) Sample Experimental Procedure. To a 25 mL three-neck flask with
a mixture of iodobenzene (2.45 g, 12.0 mmol), methyl acrylate (1.25 g,
4.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (80.8 mg, 0.36 mmol), and tetrabutylammonium
1
bromide (3.86 g, 12.0 mmol) was added a solution of 9 mL of DMF, 1 mL
of water, and 1 mL of triethylamine. The resulting brown solution was
electrolyzed with constant current (15.0 mA) on reticulate vitreous carbon
(RVC) electrodes at room temperature under an argon atmosphere until
iodobenzene was consumed (3.5 h). HCl (1 M) was then added to the
reaction mixture until a pH <5 was reached. The resulting suspension was
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were
first washed with water and brine and then poured into a short pad column
with silica gel eluting with CH2Cl2. The CH2Cl2 elute was concentrated
under reduced pressure. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel
eluting with hexane/ethyl acetate (15/1) to afford (E)-methylcinnamate (1.60
g) in 82% yield.
20% complete when the current was turned off. Clearly,
when the current was stopped the reaction returned to being
a normal room-temperature, ligand-free Heck reaction. This
5382
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 24, 2005