Full Papers
a narrow particle size distribution and a mean particle diame-
ter of 3.4 nm (Figure 2e and k). The TEM images and size distri-
bution of CoPd-DDAO/AlOOH after the fifth catalytic run were
similar to those of the fresh catalyst (cf. Figure 2a and g and
2
f and l), which demonstrates the stability of the catalyst
capped with DDAO. TEM images of the DDAO-capped mono-
metallic catalyst and the bare support (AlOOH) were also re-
corded (Figure S4).
The high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission
electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images shown in Figure S5
reveal the crystalline nature of CoPd-DDAO/AlOOH. The com-
positional mapping was performed by STEM with energy-dis-
persive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping and HAADF-STEM. Inspec-
tion of the elemental mapping image shows the uniform distri-
bution of Co and Pd elements within the bimetallic CoPd NPs
with a higher concentration of Pd than Co. The HAADF-STEM
line analysis shown in Figure S5 suggests the composition is
Co Pd . Similar results in elemental mapping images were
Figure 3. A) XRD patterns in the range of 2q=8–808 and B) with empha-
sized detail in the range of 2q=36–448 of a) AlOOH, b) Co-DDAO/AlOOH,
c) Pd-DDAO/AlOOH, d) CoPd-DDAO/AlOOH, e) CoPd-CTAB/AlOOH, f) CoPd-
PVP/AlOOH, and g) CoPd/AlOOH.
could be explained in terms of d–d bonding and the s–d
charge transfer effects as reported for other bimetallic systems
0.1
0.9
observed at various places, which demonstrate the homogene-
ity of the bimetallic CoPd NPs (consistent compositional distri-
bution within each NP) throughout the catalyst structure. The
existence of bimetallic CoPd NPs over the AlOOH surface as an
alloy is substantiated by STEM. At some places darker and
brighter regions were observed on the NPs, however, the line
analysis disproved the formation of a core–shell structure.
However, the composition of the NPs estimated by STEM-EDS
line analysis (Co Pd ) differed from that from ICP-AES
[
54,55]
such as Ni/Pt, Pd/Au, and Pd/Ag.
An intense line that corresponds to CoPd in the XRD pattern
of CoPd-CTAB/AlOOH (Figure 3e) implies the presence of large
crystals of the bimetallic CoPd particles (crystalline size in the
(111) plane is estimated to be 49.4 nm), although these were
hardly observed in TEM analysis. CoPd-DDAO/AlOOH has
a stable structure under the reaction conditions; similar elec-
tron micrographs (Figure 2 f and l) and XRD patterns (Fig-
ure S7) are obtained even after the fifth catalytic run of the
MAn hydrogenation.
0.1
0.9
(
Co0.23Pd0.77). This implied that the Co0.23Pd0.77-DDAO/AlOOH
catalyst was composed of not only the CoPd alloy NPs with
a high concentration of Pd but also isolated Co species, al-
though the latter exhibited little activity for the reaction
XPS of supported CoPd catalysts
(
Table 1, entry 3). Neither large isolated CoO particles nor par-
x
ticles with a high Co composition were observed by micro-
scopic analysis. To account for such differences, more detailed
investigations of the CoPd-DDAO/AlOOH were performed by
other spectroscopic methods.
XPS measurements were employed to investigate the oxida-
tion states of Co and Pd species and the effect of alloying on
each. The Pd3d states of the various catalysts are shown in
Figure 4, in which the Pd3d5/2 spectral lines are observed at
a binding energy (BE) around 334 eV. A significant negative
shift in the BE values for all catalysts was noticed in compari-
XRD patterns of CoPd-capped/AlOOH
[
56–60]
son to pure Pd (BE=335.1 eV).
The BEs of the Pd3d state
To gain more insight into the bimetallic CoPd alloy, the XRD
patterns were obtained for the CoPd-capped/AlOOH catalysts
and various AlOOH-supported monometallic and bimetallic
catalysts (Figure 3A). Diffraction peaks of the AlOOH structure
appeared at 2q=14.04, 28.36, 38.42, 49.06, 55.14, 64.94, and
in these catalysts are attributed to the electron-rich metallic
state of Pd as they were much lower than that of palladium
[
56–60]
oxide (BE=337.0 eV).
In the cases of bimetallic CoPd cata-
lysts, negative shifts in BE supposedly indicate an electron
transfer phenomenon from Co to Pd in CoPd NP, which is in
agreement with the Pauling electronegativities of Pd (2.2) and
Co (1.88).
7
1.848 for all catalysts. No diffraction signals that correspond
to CoO or Co O were found in any samples (Figure S6). This
3
4
indicates that either these species were absent or that the
crystalline sizes of the isolated Co species were too small to be
detected by XRD. At a 2q value of around 408, the bimetallic
CoPd NPs catalyst showed a diffraction peak at higher 2q
values in comparison to Pd-DDAO/AlOOH (Figure 3c–g). The
area of 2q=36–448 is shown in Figure 3B to highlight the dif-
ferences in monometallic and bimetallic catalysts. A similar
shift for the (111) lattice spacing of the CoPd (also observed as
a striped pattern for the closed packing plane of the face-cen-
Additionally, from comparison of the capped and noncap-
ped bimetallic CoPd catalysts, the low BE (334.0 eV) of the
noncapped bimetallic CoPd catalyst (CoPd/AlOOH) could be
distinguished from other capped bimetallic CoPd catalysts, for
which the energy of the Pd3d5/2 position increased in order
from CoPd-DDAO/AlOOH (334.2 eV) to CoPd-PVP/AlOOH
(334.4 eV) and CoPd-CTAB/AlOOH (334.5 eV). The higher BEs of
the capped CoPd catalysts than noncapped CoPd/AlOOH
could be accounted for by the synergistic effect because of
the coordination of the capping agent. If the capping agent
coordinates to metal NPs, electron donation from the capping
[
37,53]
tered cubic (fcc) structure in TEM) has been reported.
The
shift in the diffraction peak for the bimetallic nanostructure
ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 2361 – 2369
2364
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim