Figure 2. Examples of substrates successfully synthesized using
CALB as catalyst.19
Figure 1. Examples of unique substrates accepted by CALA.
the search for enantioselective catalysts in several studies,
but has in most cases failed to provide any interesting results.
However, in the esterification of highly sterically hindered
substrates, CALA has in several studies been found to be
the only lipase able to catalyze the desired reactions. The
enzyme has been found to be able to accept highly branched
acyl groups as well as sterically hindered alcohols and
amines. Some examples of substrates accepted by CALA
are shown in Figure 1. Towards these substrates, CALA
exhibits a highly useful selectivity. Thus, in the preparation
of 1, 2, 3, and 4 CALA-catalyzed synthesis provided an
enantiomeric excess of 99,9,10 99,11 98,12 and 87%,13 respec-
tively, and in the preparation of 5, CALA exhibited a Z/E
selectivity of 100/0 at 94% conversion.14 CALA has in the
patent literature been claimed to be able to esterify even
tertiary alcohols such as 6.15 This is a very unique feature
as tertiary alcohols, such as t-butyl alcohol, are often used
as more polar solvent when this is required in reactions using
other lipases as catalysts as these enzymes exhibit no activity
at all towards tertiary alcohols. Finally, also in the esterifi-
cation of cis/trans-isomers of unsaturated fatty acids such
as 7, CALA has shown a unique selectivity. While other
lipases tend to favor the esterification of cis-fatty acids,
CALA has in several studies been found to have a clear
preference for the trans-isomer.16-18
tions of CALA, accordingly, have been identified, the
potential of the enzyme is, most likely, still far from being
fully explored. In this report we present a more fundamental
characterization of the selectivity of CALA that can, hope-
fully, further help identifying new applications for this unique
catalyst.
Activity and Specificity of CALB. In contrast to CALA,
CALB is a very well characterized catalyst and its highly
diversified use has recently been reviewed.19 In immobilized
form, the catalyst has been found to tolerate a great variation
in experimental conditions and it has in numerous publica-
tions been shown to be a particularly efficient enzyme
catalyzing a great number of different organic reactions
including many that have been scaled up to commercial scale.
CALB exhibits a very high degree of substrate selectivity
both with respect to regio-selectivity and enantioselectivity.
CALB has been used intensively as a region-selective
catalyst, first of all to selectively acylate different carbohy-
drates.19 For CALB, however, the most extensive area of
use is in the resolution of racemic alcohols, amines, and
acids, or the preparation of optically active compounds from
meso reactants. The resulting optically pure compounds are
highly difficult to obtain by alternative routes and can be of
great synthetic value. The diversity of products successfully
synthesized using CALB as a regio- or enantioselective
catalyst is illustrated in Figure 2.
CALB has a very broad substrate specificity,20 and the
lipase can potentially be used in a number of other synthetic
reactions, leading to the formation of less complex structures.
The primary factor limiting the present industrial use of
CALB is, most likely, the relatively high price of the
immobilized products available today, Novozym 435 (No-
vozymes A/S) and Chirazyme L-2 (Roche Molecular Bio-
chemicals). These products are primarily targeted for the
resolution of chiral intermediates and other high-priced
specialty chemicals where performance and purity of the
catalyst is more critical than the price. If a less expensive
immobilized preparation could be made available, it could,
In summary, while early studies did not indicate that
CALA possessed any unique specificity, more recent studies
have, indeed, indicated that this is not the case. First of all,
it seems that CALA may have a unique ability to accept
very bulky substrates. Even though several unique applica-
(9) Holla, E. W.; Rebenstock, H. P.; Napierski, B.; Beck, G. Synthesis 1996,
823-825.
(10) Kingery-Wood, J.; Johnson, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3975-3976.
(11) Csomos, P.; Kanerva, L. T.; Sundholm, O.; Berhath, G.; Fu¨lo¨p, F. Magayar
Kemiaia Folyoirat 2000, 106, 71-84.
(12) Gedey, S.; Liljeblad, A.; Lazar, L.; Fu¨lo¨p, F.; Kanerva, L. T. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2001, 12, 105-110.
(13) Ayers, T. A.; Schnettler, R. A.; Marciniak, G.; Stewart, K. T.; Mishra, R.
K.; Krysan, J. D.; Bernas, B. R.; Bardwaj, P.; Fevig, T. L. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 45-55.
(14) Henkel, B.; Kunath, A.; Schick, H. J. Prakt. Chem. 1997, 339, 434-40.
(15) Bosley, J. A.; Casey, J.; Macrae, A. R.; Mycock, G. (Unichema Chemie
B.V.). WO 95/01450, July 2, 1993; Chem. Abstr. 1995, 122, 185512.
(16) Borgdorf, R.; Warwel, S. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 51, 480-485.
(17) Warwel, S.; Borgdorf, R.; Bru¨hl, L. Biotechnol. Lett. 1999, 21, 431-436.
(18) Warwel, S.; Borgdorf, R. Biotechnol. Lett. 2000, 22, 1151-1155.
(19) Anderson, E. M.; Larsson, K. M.; Kirk, O. Biocatal. Biotransform. 1998,
16, 181-204.
(20) Kirk, O.; Bjo¨rkling, F.; Godtfredsen, S. E.; Larsen, T. O. Biocatalysis 1992,
6, 127-134.
Vol. 6, No. 4, 2002 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
447