N. Akhtar et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 6 (2013) 291–298
297
3
.5.1. Methanolysis
thin layer chromatography using solvent system (EtOAc-MeOH-
O-HOAc; 4:2:2:2) and identified as -glucose and -rhamnose in
case of compound 1 by the sign of its optical rotation ([
Compound 2 (12 mg) was refluxed separately with 6 ml of 1 N
H
2
D
L
20
HCl and 25 ml of MeOH for 15 h. The reaction mixture was then
extracted with n-hexane (3 ml ꢁ 25 ml) to obtain the correspond-
ing fatty acid methyl esters, which were analyzed by GC-MS after
acetylation with aceticanhydride-pyridine. The aqueous layer was
evaporated to dryness, and the residue was separated by silica gel
column chromatography as sphingosine base and methylated
sugar. The base was acetylated and analyzed by GC-MS. The sugar
a
]
D
ꢀ 52)
+ 8.1), respectively. These sugars were also confirmed
by the retention time of their TMS ethers ( -glucose -anomer
4.1 min, -anomer 7.8 min and -rhamnose 8.6 min) with the
standards and -galactose in case of compound 3 ([
2
0
and ([a]
D
D
a
b
L
20
D
a
]
D
+80.18)
and retention time of
standard.
a-anomer 3.0, b-anomer 5.2 min with a
was identified as methyl
b
-
D
-glucopyranoside based on the sign of
25
optical rotation [
a]
D
+76.2 (c 0.1, MeOH) and Co-TLC profile [R
f
3.10. Antioxidant assay
0
.45 (EtOAc/MeOH/H
2
O; 5:2:0.5)].
Nitric oxide scavenging antioxidant activity assay was
performed following the published procedure based on diazoti-
zation reaction described by Griess (Garratt, 1964). The assay uses
sodium nitroprusside as the source of NO and sulfanilamide and
2
5
1
3
.5.1.1. Methyl ester derived from 2. [
a
]
D
ꢀ7.18 (c 0.01); H NMR
0
0
(CDCl
3
, 400 MHz):
d
5.35 (2H, dt, J = 15.1, 5.2, H-16 ,17 ), 4.13 (1H t,
J = 6.7, H-2 ), 3.51 (3H, s, MeO), 2.02–2.14 (4H, m, CH
0
0
0
2
-15 ,18 ), 1.99
0
0
0
0
(3H, s, MeCO), 1.17–1.27 (36H, br s, CH
2
-4 –14 ,19 –25 ), 0.81 (3H,
N-1-naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride under acidic con-
0
+
ꢀ
t, J = 6.5, Me-26 ); GC-MS: m/z 466 [M] .
dition to detect NO
2
generated at the expense of NO by the
antioxidant system. Briefly, a known quantity of the test
compound in solution form was mixed with 100 l of 20 mM
sodium nitroprusside solution. Total volume was made up to
1000 l with 200 mM Phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The content were
mixed well and incubated at 37 8C for 2 h followed by addition of
Griess reagent (100 l). The mixture was kept at room tempera-
ture for 20 min. Optical density (OD) of the colored solution
formed was measured at 528 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as the
positive control. OD reduced with increasing concentration of the
antioxidant component.
2
5
3
.5.1.2. Acetylsphingamine derived from 2. [
a]
D
+13.9 (c 0.011);
8.06 (1H, d, J = 7.3, NH), 4.55 (1H, dd,
J = 5.2, 4.3, H-4), 4.51 (1H, m, H-2), 4.42 (1H, dd, J = 11.3, 5.5, H-1),
.33 (1H, dd, J = 11.3, 3.2, H-1), 4.17 (1H, dd, J = 5.2, 3.2, H-3); 2.01
6H, s, 2ꢁ MeCO), 1.99 (6H, s, 2ꢁ MeCO), 1.13–1.21 (24H, br s,
m
1
3
H NMR (CDCl , 400 MHz): d
m
4
(
CH
m
+
2
(6–17), 0.86 (3H, t, J = 6.6, Me-18); GC-MS: m/z 485 [M] .
3
.5.2. Oxidative cleavage of the double bond in 2
To the solution of methyl ester of compound 2 (4 mg) in
acetone, added 1 ml of 0.04 M solution of K
aqueous solution 0.025 M KMnO and 0.09 M NaIO
round bottom flask. The reaction was allowed to proceed at 37 8C
for 18 h. After acidification with 5 N H SO , the solution was
decolorized with a 1 M solution of oxalic acid and extracted with
Et O (3 to10 ml). The combined organic extract was dried over
Na SO , filtered, and concentrated. The resulting carboxylic acids
2
CO
3
, 6 ml of an
4
4
in 100 ml
3.11. Urease inhibition assay
2
4
Antiurease activity of the isolated compounds was determined
by an optimized 96 well microplate-based modified Berthelot
(phenolhypochlorite) method using a kit (Gesellschaft fur Biochem-
ica und Diagonistica mbH, Germany) as described elsewhere (Pervez
2
2
4
were methylated with ethereal solution of diazomethane and
analyzed by GC-MS.
et al., 2008). Briefly, 20
dispensed in every well of the plate along with 60
buffer. Themixturewasincubatedat25 8Cfor10 minand5
compound was added. After 10 min incubation at room tempera-
ture, 15 l of 20 mM urea was added. The mixture was incubated at
25 8C for 10 min and then 100 l reagent 2 was added. After 25 min
incubation at room temperature, absorbance was measured in an
ELISA platereader (BioTek ModelELx 800) at630 nm. The valuesthis
obtained were used to calculate percentage inhibition using Gen 5
software. Thiourea was used as the positive control.
m
l of Human urease enzyme (1 unit) was
l of phosphate
loftest
m
m
3.6. Rubridoidside (3)
m
2
5
White amorphous powder (25 mg); [
a]
D
ꢀ64.68 (c 0.11,
m
ꢀ
1
CH OH); IR (KBr): 3440, 3005, 1755, 1603, and 1094 cm ; UV
MeOH): 218 (4.01); H and C NMR: see Table 3; HRFABMS: m/z
3
1
13
(
4
+
71.1515 [M+H] calcd. for C21
27
H O12, 471.1502.
3.7. Rubrajaleelol (4)
3
.12. Cytotoxicity assay (in vitro)
2
5
White amorphous powder (19 mg); [
CHCl ); IR (KBr): 3470, 2950, 1667 and 1070 cm
NMR: see Table 4; HREIMS: m/z 444.3610 [M] calcd. for C29
44.3603.
a
]
D
+54.38 (c 0.012,
ꢀ
1
1
13
3
;
H- and
C
Cytotoxic assay was performed using Brine shrimps following a
+
H
48
O
3
,
published method (Atta-ur-Rahman and Choudhry, 1999). Briefly,
brine shrimps (Artemia salina, Leach) eggs were hatched in artificial
seawater. A sample of the test compound containing the pre-
determined quantity was transferred to vials (three for each
concentration) with one vial as the negative control to which was
added the solvent, MeOH, only. The solvent was allowed to
evaporate overnight. When the shrimp larvae were ready, 1 mL of
sea water along with 10 shrimps was transferred to each vial and
the volume was adjusted to 5 mL per vial with sea water. The
number of survivors was counted after 24 h to calculate the
cytotoxicity in terms of %age of the dead larvae. Etoposide, an anti-
cancer drug, was used as the positive control.
4
3.8. Rubrajaleelic acid (5)
2
D
5
Colorless amorphous solid (15 mg); [
a]
+ 68.78 (c 0.011,
ꢀ1 1
CHCl ); IR (KBr): 3430, 3285–2560, 1710, 1655 and 1065 cm ; H
and C NMR: see Table 4; HREIMS: m/z 458.3408 [M] calcd. for
, 458.3396.
3
13
+
29 46 4
C H O
3.9. Acid hydrolysis
A solution of compounds 1,3 (8 mg each) in MeOH (5 ml)
containing 1 N HCl (4 ml) was refluxed for 4 h, concentrated under
reduced pressure, and diluted with H O (8 ml). The aglycones were
3.13. Phytotoxicity assay (seed germination assay)
2
extracted with EtOAc (3 ml ꢁ 15 ml). The aqueous phases were
Phytotoxicity in terms of seed germination inhibition was
determined through a published assay (Atta-ur-Rahman and
concentrated under reduced pressure and purified on preparative