Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
ACS Catalysis
pubs.acs.org/acscatalysis
Research Article
Keon[Cy]
KHo[H3O+]
transitional and rotational freedoms, leading to the large loss of
entropy.31 In this mechanism, the C−O and C−H bonds in
cyclohexanol are cleaved in one concerted step. When the
reaction occurs in the active capsule, the highly polar
confinement in the capsule appears to stabilize the cyclohexyl
carbenium ion, shifting the reaction mechanism from E2 to E1.
The E1 mechanism is also seen in cyclohexanol dehydration by
hydrated hydronium ions in the aqueous phase,8 which is by
far more polar than CHCl3. It should be emphasized that the
higher transition entropy suggests that the constrained
environment induces a later transition state and/or a higher
reaction volume for the elimination reaction.
Chlorocyclohexane is formed via the substitution of the OH
group in cyclohexanol by the Cl− ion (Figure 4C).
Chlorocyclohexane is not observed, and we hypothesize that
blocking this reaction route is related to the strong hydrogen
bonding of the chloride anion to the capsule framework,24,26
hindering it to approach cyclohexanol from the appropriate
orientation.
r = k[Cap]·
·
1 + Keon[Cy] 1 + KHo[H3O+]
(1)
where r is the dehydration rate, [Cap] is the concentration of
resorcinarene capsules, and [Cy] and [H3O+] are the
cyclohexanol and the hydronium ion concentrations, respec-
tively. Regression of the plots in Figure 3 using eq 1 gives the
values of Koen, KoH, and k at different temperatures (Table 1).
Table 1. Kinetic Parameters for Cyclohexanol Dehydration
Catalyzed by the Resorcinarene Capsule with HCl
temperature (K)
Koen
KHo
k (s−1
)
318
323
328
333
586
446
296
217
−60
30
16
12
6.5
1.3 × 10−5
2.8 × 10−5
5.8 × 10−5
1.4 × 10−4
ΔHo or ΔHo‡ (kJ mol−1
)
4
−86
6
138
5
ΔSo or ΔSo‡ (J mol−1 K−1
)
−134 11
−243 19
93 16
For comparison, zeolite HBEA, a microporous solid acid,
was tested in cyclohexanol dehydration. It has an identical
reacting space for each turnover of cyclohexanol, that is, 1.4
nm3 in the capsule cavity and 1.1 nm3 micropore volume per
BAS in HBEA (0.20 cm3 g−1 micropore volume normalized to
BAS concentration). Under identical conditions, it shows a
catalytic activity higher than free HCl and lower than the active
capsule (Figure 5) and a reaction order of zero for
cyclohexanol (Figure S8). The activation energy and activation
entropy for the active capsule and in HBEA are very close (145
vs 138 kJ mo−1; 93 vs 97 J mol−1 K−1, Figure 5), while largely
different from those in HCl (47 kJ mol−1, −212 J mol−1 K−1).
This indicates the same change in the mechanism and kinetics
of the reaction by confining the reacting space, irrespective of
whether an organic or an inorganic structure is constituting the
pore or cavity.
Raising the reaction temperature reduced Keon and KHo ,
indicating an exothermic process for the encapsulation of
cyclohexanol and the association of hydronium ions with the
enthalpy and entropy changes for the two steps were obtained,
and by the Eyring relation (Figure S6C), the activation
enthalpy and entropy were deduced. The enthalpies of
cyclohexanol encapsulation and hydronium ion association
were −60 and −86 kJ mol−1, respectively; the intrinsic
activation enthalpy is 138 kJ mol−1, and the activation entropy
is 93 J mol−1 K−1. Such high intrinsic activation enthalpy and
entropy indicate that the cyclohexanol dehydration follows an
E1 mechanism, which proceeds via a metastable cyclohexyl
carbenium ion intermediate (C6H11+).8,31
In contrast, the activation enthalpy of the HCl-catalyzed
dehydration in CHCl3 with water is only 47 kJ mol−1 and the
activation entropy is −212 J mol−1 K−1 (Figures 5 and S7).
Such low activation enthalpy and entropy indicate that the
dehydration by hydronium ions in CHCl3 proceeds via an E2
mechanism. In this mechanism, the hydronium ion associates
with cyclohexanol to form the transition state and loses
In spite of these analogies, there is still a 7 kJ mol−1
difference in the activation energy of the active capsule and
HBEA, which caused a different rate by a factor of 8 (at 333
K). This is speculated to be caused by the differences in
forming the confined space. With the same reacting volume,
the capsule activity offers a completely closed space in all three
dimensions, while HBEA constrains the reacting space along
the channel walls but not along the channel axial dimension.
Thus, the reacting cyclohexanol in HBEA may have higher
freedom of motion, which agrees with the slightly higher
activation entropy in HBEA than in the capsules. However, the
capsule cavity constituted by hydrogen bonds is not as rigid as
the micropore channels held by covalent bonds in HBEA, so
that it is possibly capable of flexibly readjusting the dimension
to better fit the reacting transition state and thus decrease the
activation energy.
CONCLUSIONS
■
We have shown that resorcinarene hexamer capsules in CHCl3
are capable of encapsulating cyclohexanol with a maximum
capacity of two cyclohexanol molecules per capsule. In the
presence of HCl forming hydrated hydronium ions, the
encapsulated cyclohexanol is dehydrated to cyclohexene, with
rates 2 orders of magnitude higher than in the unconstrained
solvent. The reaction of cyclohexanol in the capsule did not
lead to partially chlorinated cyclohexanol because Cl− was
stabilized by interacting with the capsule and thus became less
reactive.
Figure 5. Arrhenius plots of the cyclohexanol dehydration rate on
different catalysts. Rate on HCl is normalized to the amount of HCl;
rate on HBEA is normalized to the BAS amount in the loaded HBEA;
and rate on the active capsule is normalized to the amount of the
active capsule. (Reaction conditions: 300 mM cyclohexanol, 150 mM
HCl, and 1/40 volume of water in chloroform (orange); 20 mM
cyclohexanol, 3.3 mM capsule, and 32 mM HCl in water-saturated
chloroform (blue); and 23 mg of water-saturated HBEA, 20 mM
cyclohexanol in 4 mL of water-saturated chloroform (black)).
13374
ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 13371−13376