GModel
CATTOD-8788; No. of Pages8
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
X. Wan et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
O
Catalyst
O
+
CH OH
O2
+ H O
2
3
+
OCH3
Scheme 1. Oxidative esterification of methacrolein with methanol to methyl methacrylate.
particle size will be discussed in detail. The substrate scope of the
Au/MgO catalyst will also be investigated.
2.3. Catalytic reaction
The oxidative esterification of MAL and other aldehydes or alco-
hols to methyl esters was performed in a batch-type Teflon-lined
stainless-steel autoclave. Typically, MAL purchased from Alfa Aesar
2
. Experimental
(
12 mmol) and the catalyst (typically, 0.50 g) were added into the
2
.1. Catalyst preparation
reactor pre-charged with methanol (20 mL). After the introduction
of O2 with a certain pressure (typically 0.2 MPa), the mixture was
heated up to a reaction temperature (typically 343 K) in an oil bath,
and then the catalytic reaction was started by vigorously stirring.
After a fixed time (typically 2 h, recorded as reaction time), the reac-
tion was stopped by cooling down the reactor to room temperature
in cold water. The products were analyzed by a gas chromatograph
equipped with a FID detector and a capillary column (DB-FFAP,
60 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 m) using ethanol as an external standard
for quantification.
The supported Au catalysts were prepared by
a
deposition–precipitation (DP) method using urea as a homo-
geneous precipitant. In brief, urea was first added into an aqueous
solution of HAuCl4 (typically 0.48 mmol L ) with a molar ratio
of urea/Au of 100:1. Then, the support was added into the mixed
aqueous solution, and the suspension was vigorously stirred at
−1
3
53 K. After aging for a certain time (typically 4 h), the solid product
was recovered by centrifugation followed by thorough washing
with deionized water to remove the remaining chloride anion. The
resulting powdery solid was dried in air at 353 K for 1 h, and finally
reduced in H at 523 K for 2 h. The concentration of HAuCl and the
3
. Results and discussion
2
4
aging time were regulated to control the size of Au nanoparticles
as reported previously [25]. The target Au loading in each catalyst
used in this work was 0.5 wt%.
3
.1. Catalytic behaviors of Au nanoparticles loaded on different
supports
Table 1 shows the catalytic performances of Au catalysts loaded
on different supports for the direct oxidative esterification of MAL
with methanol in the presence of O2 to MMA. Au catalysts loaded
on some metal oxides without basicity such as SiO , TiO , and
2
.2. Catalyst characterization
Transmission electronic microscopy measurements were car-
2
2
SBA-15 showed poorer activity for the conversion of MAL. The
selectivities of MMA over these catalysts were also quite lower.
Many side reactions occurred over these catalysts, and the main
by-products included isobutyric acid, isobutyl aldehyde, dimers of
the methacrolein, and CO . The employment of Al O , ZnO, ZrO ,
and hydroxyapatite as the supports of Au catalysts provided mod-
erate MMA selectivities (68–83%) although the conversions of MAL
over these catalysts were not high. Among all of the catalysts exam-
ined in the present work, the Au/MgO and Au/hydrotalcite (HT)
exhibited the best performance for the conversion of MAL to MMA;
the yields of MMA were 97% and 90% over the Au/MgO and Au/HT,
ried out on a JEM-2100 electron microscope operated at an
acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The mean size of Au nanoparticles
in the sample was estimated from the TEM micrographs by count-
ing around 150–200 particles. By assuming a spherical model of Au
nanoparticles, the Au dispersion (D) could be estimated by using
the following relationship, D = 1.17/d(nm) × 100%, where d is parti-
cle diameter [26]. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
2
2
3
2
(
4
ICP-MS) measurements were performed with an Agilent ICP-MS
500 instrument to measure the content of Au in each sample. Spe-
cific surface areas of the catalysts were measured by N adsorption
2
with Micromeritics Tristar II 3020.
CO2 adsorption measurements were performed on
a
Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument. Typically, the sample
loaded in a quartz tube was first pretreated with high-purity He
at 423 K for 2 h. After the sample was cooled down to 323 K, the
Table 1
Catalytic performances of Au catalysts loaded on different supports for the oxidative
esterification of MAL with CH3OH in the presence of O2.
a
reactor was evacuated for 1 h. Then, CO adsorption was performed
2
Selectivityb (%)
Catalyst
MAL conv. (%)
by dosing certain amount of CO . After adsorption for 30 min, the
2
MMA
MIB
MAA
Others
gas phase and the weakly adsorbed CO2 were evacuated. Then,
CO2 adsorption amount was evaluated by the difference between
the CO2 amounts injected and evacuated.
Au/SiO2
Au/SBA-15
Au/Al2O3
Au/TiO2
Au/ZrO2
Au/ZnO
Au/CeO2
Au/MgO
Au/HT
16
13
42
25
33
28
58
98
99
31
16
8.8
80
39
67
78
99
99
91
83
0.5
0.3
1.6
1.5
0.2
2.7
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.6
1.1
0.8
3.0
0.8
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
82
90
16
59
33
19
0.4
0.4
8.4
16
The strength of basicity for different supports was estimated
by Hammett titration. The methyl red, bromothymol blue, phenol-
phthalein, 2,4-dinitroaniline, and 4-nitroaniline were used as the
Hammett indicators with the pKa values of +4.8, +7.2, +9.3, +15.0,
and +18.4, respectively. The indicators were dissolved in petroleum
ether of reagent grade and its concentration was ∼0.1 wt%. After
drying in vacuum, 100 mg of grinded sample was rapidly trans-
ferred into a tube and 1 mL of petroleum ether was injected to cover
the sample. Subsequently, several drops of indicator solution were
added followed by vigorous shaking. The strength of the basicity of
supports was determined by the color change.
Au/HAP
a
Reaction conditions: catalyst (Au loading, ∼0.45 wt%), 0.50 g; CH3OH/MAL = 40:1
molar ratio); CH3OH, 20 mL; P(O2) = 0.2 MPa; T = 343 K; t = 2 h.
and some unknown products.
(
b
Please cite this article in press as: X. Wan, et al., Magnesia-supported gold nanoparticles as efficient catalysts for oxidative esterification of