190
D. Tibiletti et al. / Journal of Catalysis 244 (2006) 183–191
a support such as zirconia, which is yet difficult to reduce, the
WGS mechanism could involve a simple redox mechanism as
described by Flytzani–Stephanopoulos et al. and Gorte et al.
References
[1] C. Rhodes, G.J. Hutchings, A.M. Ward, Catal. Today 23 (1995) 43.
[2] M. Laniecki, M. Malecka-Grycz, F. Domka, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 196
[
13–19], possibly at the metal–support interface. This could in-
(
2000) 293.
3] A.N. Fatsikostas, D.I. Kondarides, X.E. Verykios, Catal. Today 75 (2002)
45.
volve activation of water at an oxygen vacancy on the surface
of the zirconia adjacent to a Pt particle, followed by transfer of
O(ads) to the Pt, where it could react with CO to release CO2.
We emphasise that these considerations of possible reaction
intermediates strictly apply only to this catalyst under these re-
action conditions. Elsewhere [36,39,69], we have frequently
emphasised the point that the dominant reaction mechanism
for the WGS reaction is dependent on experimental parame-
ters, such as the reaction temperature or the gas composition.
To this we can now add the choice of support, because it
seems abundantly clear that the mechanism on zirconia under
these experimental conditions is different from that on ceria-
or ceria/zirconia-supported catalysts. Finally, even for this cat-
alyst, it must be stressed that the use of different experimental
conditions (such as much higher water concentration, e.g., 52%,
as used by Davis et al. [30], instead of the 7% used here) or a
different metal or method of preparation of a zirconia-supported
catalyst could result in different conclusions. The feed used in
the present study also lacked the CO2 that normally would be
present in a true fuel processor. Some experiments with added
CO2 were carried out, but the analysis of the data was partic-
ularly complex because of the occurrence of the reverse reac-
tion. It should be stressed that the dominant mechanism could
change with increasing partial pressure of CO2.
[
1
[4] K.A. Adamson, Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1231.
[5] C.C. Elam, C.E.G. Padro, G. Sandrock, A. Luzzi, P. Lindblad, E.F. Hagen,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 28 (2003) 601.
[6] V. Idakiev, T. Tabakova, A. Naydenov, Z.-Y. Yuan, B.-L. Su, Appl. Catal.
B Environ. 63 (2006) 178.
[
[
7] W. Ruettinger, O. Ilinich, R.J. Farrauto, J. Power Sources 118 (2003) 61.
8] R. Farrauto, S. Hwang, L. Shore, W. Ruettinger, J. Lampert, T. Giroux,
Y. Liu, O. Ilinich, Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 33 (2003) 1.
9] P.S. Querino, J.R.C. Bispo, M.D. Rangel, Catal. Today 107–108 (2005)
920.
[
[10] H. Iida, A. Igarashi, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 303 (2006) 48.
[11] D. Tibiletti, A. Amieiro-Fonseca, R. Burch, Y. Chen, J.M. Fisher, A. Go-
guet, C. Hardacre, P. Hu, A. Thompsett, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (47) (2005)
22553.
[12] S. Ricote, G. Jacobs, M. Milling, Y. Ji, P.M. Patterson, B.H. Davis, Appl.
Catal. A Gen. 303 (2006) 35.
[13] W. Liu, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, J. Catal. 153 (1995) 317.
[
[
14] Q. Fu, H. Saltsburg, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Science 301 (2003) 935.
15] Y. Li, Q. Fu, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 27
(
2000) 179.
16] T. Bunluesin, R.J. Gorte, G.W. Graham, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 15 (1998)
07.
17] R.J. Gorte, S. Zhao, Catal. Today 104 (2005) 18.
[
1
[
[18] S. Hilaire, S. Sharma, R.J. Gorte, J.M. Vohs, H.-W. Jen, Catal. Lett. 70
2000) 131.
19] S. Hilaire, X. Wang, T. Luo, R.J. Gorte, J. Wagner, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 215
2001) 271.
(
[
[
[
(
4
. Conclusion
20] C.M.Y. Yeung, F. Meunier, R. Burch, D. Thompsett, S.C. Tsang, J. Phys.
Chem. B 110 (2006) 8540.
21] D.C. Grenoble, M.M. Estadt, D.F. Ollis, J. Catal. 67 (1981) 90.
Only carbonyl and formate species were observed by in
situ DRIFTS during the WGS reaction over our Pt/ZrO2. The
steady-state surface coverage of carbonate species was negligi-
ble. Isotopic transient kinetic analyses revealed that formates
exchanged uniformly according to a first-order law, suggest-
ing that most formates observed by DRIFTS were of the same
reactivity. In addition, the time scale of the exchange of the re-
action product CO2 was significantly shorter than that of the
surface formates. Therefore, the formate route, which is based
on the formates seen on DRIFTS, can be ruled out as being
the main reaction pathway in the present case. The number of
precursors of the reaction product, CO2, was lower than the
number of surface Pt atoms, suggesting that carbonyl species,
or some “infrared-invisible” complex (not excluding formates)
at the interface between Pt and zirconia was the main reaction
intermediate. A simple redox mechanism could also explain the
present results.
[22] A. Luengnaruemitchai, S. Osuwan, E. Gulari, Catal. Commun. 4 (2003)
15.
2
[23] A. Venugopal, J. Aluha, M.S. Scurrell, Catal. Lett. 90 (2003) 1.
[24] S.L. Swartz, M.M. Seabaugh, C.T. Holt, W. Dawson, Fuel Cells Bull. 30
(2000) 7.
[25] T. Shido, Y. Iwasawa, J. Catal. 141 (1993) 71.
[26] G. Jacobs, L. Williams, U. Graham, G.A. Thomas, D.E. Sparks, B.H.
Davis, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 252 (2003) 107.
[27] G. Jacobs, L. Williams, U. Graham, D. Sparks, B.H. Davis, J. Phys. Chem.
B 107 (2003) 10398.
[28] G. Jacobs, U.M. Graham, E. Chenu, P.M. Patterson, A. Dozier, B.H.
Davis, J. Catal. 229 (2005) 499.
[
[
29] H. Iida, A. Igarashi, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 303 (2006) 48.
30] E. Chenu, G. Jacobs, A.C. Crawford, R.A. Keogh, P.M. Patterson, D.E.
Sparks, B.H. Davis, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 59 (2005) 45.
[31] G. Jacobs, E. Chenu, P.M. Patterson, L. Williams, D. Sparks, G. Thomas,
B.H. Davis, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 258 (2004) 203.
[
[
[
32] G. Jacobs, P.M. Patterson, L. Williams, E. Chenu, D. Sparks, G. Thomas,
B.H. Davis, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 262 (2004) 177.
33] G. Jacobs, P.M. Patterson, L. Williams, D. Sparks, B.H. Davis, Catal.
Lett. 96 (2004) 97.
34] M. Weibel, F. Garin, P. Bernhardt, G. Maire, M. Prigent, in: Catalysis
and Automotive Pollution Control II, vol. 71, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991,
p. 195.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank MEL for providing the ZrO2 sample and
Dr. Tiziano Montini, University of Trieste for performing the
chemisorption measurements. Financial support was provided
by MIUR (Italy) under the PRIN projects (to A.T.), the Carmac
EPSRC project, and the CONCORDE Coordination Action on
Nanostructured Oxides (NMP2-CT-2004-505834).
[35] R.A. Koeppel, A. Baiker, C. Schild, A. Wokaun, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday
Trans. I 87 (1991) 2821.
[36] D. Tibiletti, A. Goguet, F.C. Meunier, J.P. Breen, R. Burch, Chem. Com-
mun. (2004) 1636.
[37] X.Q. Gong, P. Hu, R. Raval, J. Chem. Phys. 119 (2003) 6324.