Pleas De ad l to o nn oT tr aa nd sj au cs t ti omn as rgins
Page 6 of 8
Journal Name
ARTICLE
ultrasound for 10 min, and then filled with argon. Subsequently, the The Ag@UCPP as heterogeneous catalyst exhibited excellent
o
DOI: 10.1039/D0DT02559C
tube was heated in an oil bath at 120 C for 3 days. Thereafter, the activity for carboxylative cyclization of propargyl alcohols with CO
resulting precipitate was collected by filtration and repeatedly under mild conditions, together with good recyclability with
2
washed with DMF, CH
2
Cl
2
, ethanol and acetone. The obtained successively used at least five runs. The outstanding catalytic
o
power was dried under vacuum at 70 C for 24 h to produce the performance could be attributed to the synergistic effect of the
orange power, which was referred as to UCPP.
2
UCPP in adsorption and activation of CO and immobilization of Ag
nanoparticles. This work highlighted the potential of functional CMP
as support for metal nanoparticles, also affording possible
Preparation of Ag@UCPP
The Ag@UCPP was prepared according to previous literature with a opportunities for the design and synthesis of heterogeneous
[
6c]
slight modification. Typically, the prepared UCPP (100 mg) was catalyst toward CO
2
conversion.
added to a solution of AgNO (7 mg) in methanol (5 mL). The
3
mixtures were continuously stirred for 3 hrs at room temperatue.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
The solid was filtered, washed with methanol, and activated at 100
o
C in vacuum, which then was reduced by excess NaBH
4
aqueous
solution (20 mg NaBH
4
in 3 mL water) for another 4 hrs. After that,
the obtained catalyst was filtered, washed with deionized water,
o
and dried at 70 C in vacuum, furnishing the final Ag@UCPP Acknowledgements
catalyst.
We thank the Institute of Science and Technology Innovation, DGUT
No. KCYCXPT2017007).
General procedure for catalytic activity test
(
Typically, the Ag@UCPP catalyst (15 mg), propargylic alcohols (0.5
mmol), DBU (1.0 equiv.), and acetonitrile (2.0 mL) was charged into
a stainless steel autoclave with 10 mL Teflon-lined tube. After
Notes and references
2
sealing, the reactor was charge CO until the desired pressure.
1
(a) G. Kupgan, L. J. Abbott, K. E. Hart, C. M. Colina, Chem. Rev
Afterwards, the reaction proceeded at room temperature for 24
hrs. After completion, the catalyst was removed and the mixture
was analyzed quantitatively using gas chromatography with
naphthalene as internal standard. All of the pure products were
identified by H NMR, C NMR and GC-MS.
Catalyst characterization
2
018, 118, 5488-5538. (b) A. E. Creamer B. Gao, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2016, 50, 7276-7289. (c) O. Buyukcakir, S. H. Je, S. N.
Talapaneni, D. Kim, A. Coskun, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017,
9, 7209-7216.
1
13
2 (a) Q. Liu, L. Wu, R, Jackstell, M. Beller. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6,
5
2
3
933. (b) S. Dabral, T. Schaub. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 223-
46. (c) Q. W. Song, Z. –H. Zhou, L.-N. He, Green Chem. 2017, 19,
707-3728. (d) J. Luo, I. Larrosa, ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 3317-
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was obtained on a
1
3
Nicolet iS10 spectrometer. C CP-MAS solid-state NMR was
performed by JEOL JNM-ECZ600R at 300 MHz. The Ag loading was
determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-
MS; Varian Vista MPX). Power X-ray diffraction (XRD) was recorded
3332. (e) X. Lan, C. Du, L. Cao, T. She, Y. Li, G. Bai. ACS Appl.
Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 38953-38962. (f) X. Lan, Q. Li, L. Cao,
C. Du, L. Ricardez-Sandoval, G. Bai, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508,
1
45220.
M. Li, S. Abdolmohammadi, M. S. Hoseininezhad-Namin, F.
Behmagham, E. Vessally, J. CO Util. 2020, 38, 220-231.
3
o
on a Bruker D8 Advance with the scanning range of 3-80 at a rate
2
o
of 0.1 step/sec. N
2
adsorption-desorption isotherms were recorded 4 R. Méreau, B. Grignard, A. Boyaval, C. Detrembleur, C. Jerome, T.
a Micromeritics Tristar II 3020 apparatus at 77 K and the surface
areas was calculated by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method. Scanning
electron microscope (SEM) was performed on the JSM-7500.
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) was achieved on Tecnai G2
F20 S-TWIN (FEI) under 200 KV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Tassaing, ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 956-960.
5
(a) Z. Yang, B. Yu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Y. Chen, Z. Ma, G. Ji, X. Gao,
B. Han, Z. Liu, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1268-1273. (b) Y. Yuan, Y. Xie, C.
Zeng, D. Song, S. Chaemchuen, C. Chen, F. Verpoort, Catal. Sci.
Technol. 2017, 7, 2935–2939. (c) Y. Yuan, Y. Xie, C. Zeng, D. Song,
S. Chaemchuen, C. Chen, F. Verpoort, Green Chem. 2017, 19, 2936-
2940. (d) C. Xie, J. Song, H. Wu, Y. Hu, H. Liu, Y. Yang, Z. Zhang, B.
Chen, B. Han, Green Chem. 2018, 20, 4655–4661. (e) Zhang, G.;
Yang, H.; Fei, H., ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2519-2525. (f) X. Yu, Z. Yang,
F. Zhang, Z. Liu, P. Yang, H. Zhang, B Yu, Y. Zhao, Z. Liu, Chem.
Commun. 2019, 55, 12475-12478. (g) Z. Wu, X. Lan, Y. Zhang, M.
Li, G. Bai. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 11063–11069. (h) C. Du, X. Lan,
G. An, Q. Li, G. Bai. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7051-
7058.
(a) P. Bhanja, A. Modak, A. Bhaumik. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24,
7
Horike, L. Tang, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801587. (c) X. Lan,
Y. Li, C. Du, T. She, Q. Li, G. Bai. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 8560-
8
3
(
(
XPS) was tested on the PHI 1600 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
PE company, USA). CO adsorption/desorption isotherms were
2
1
13
measured on Autosorb-iQ-MP at 273 K and 298 K. H and C NMR
was operated on BUXI-I NMR (400 M).
Conclusions
6
7
In summary, a urea-linked conjugated porous polymer (UCPP)
assembled by enol-imine with order dual-unit arrays in the
networks and high physicochemical stability has been successfully
fabricated, and further served as a platform for Ag nanoparticles.
The resultant Ag@UCPP material was systematically characterized,
revealing that the UCPP not only could facilitate the high
distribution of Ag nanoparticles and confine the growth of particles,
but could provide strong interaction for stabilizing Ag nanoparticles
in the surface or interlayer of networks by the dual anchoring sites.
278-7297. (b) Z. Lei, Y. Xue, W. Chen, W. Qiu, Y. Zhang, S.
569. (d) M. Liu, J. Lan, L. Liang, J. Sun, M. Arai, J. Catal. 2017,
47, 138-147.
(a) A. I. Cooper, Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1291-1295. (b) S. Mane, Y.
X. Li, X.Q. Liu, M. B. Yue, L. B. Sun, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng
2018, 6, 17419-17426. (c) J. Chen, W. Yan, E. J. Townsend, J.
Feng, L. Pan, V. D. A. Hernandez, C. F. J. Faul, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2019, 58, 11715-11719.
Please do not adjust margins