Chemical Papers
Compared with the FT-IR of PAMPS5M, the peak at
3318 cm−1 of PFAMPS, ascribed to N–H stretching, is
weaker, because –SO3H was displaced by (–SO3)3Fe. The
peak at 2976 cm−1 is ascribed to saturated C–H stretching,
the peak at 1646 cm−1 is ascribed to C=O stretching, and
the peaks at 1032 and 1148 cm−1 are indicative of the pres-
The influence of PAMPS with different crosslink-
ing degrees on the reaction was studied. PAMPS5M,
PAMPS10M, PAMPS15M, PAMPS20M, and PAMPS25M
were used as catalysts for the reaction, where the yields of
4a were 95, 90, 88, 83, and 83%, respectively. With increas-
ing crosslinking degrees of PAMPS, the H+ content and the
yields of 4a decreased. There was not a sulfonic group in
the crosslinking reagent MBA, so the H+ content of PAMPS
decreased with increasing crosslinking degrees.
−
ence of –SO3 .
The FT-IR of recycled PFAMPS is similar to that of vir-
gin PFAMPS, which confrms that the structure of PFAMPS
does not change after reaction catalysis. Therefore, the
catalytic efect of recycled PAMPS does not signifcantly
decrease.
As shown in Table 3, with increased PAMPS5M amounts
catalyze the Biginelli reaction to synthesize 3,4-dihydropy-
rimidin-2(1H)-ones, where ionized H+ from PAMPS acted
as a catalyst. Additionally, protonic acid could act as an acid,
and Lewis acids could act catalysts. Lewis acidic Fe3+ is
widely used as a catalyst and is nontoxic, but inorganic fer-
ric salts, for example FeCl3, used as catalysts are generally
unable to be recycled. Fe3+ could be supported on inorganic
materials or polymers, and recycled after reaction catalysis,
but Fe3+ can be easily lost after recycling for some supported
Fe3+ catalysts and the catalytic efects of recycled catalysts
decrease. The reason may be that the action between Fe3+
and matrix is weak. There are amido and sulfonic groups in
et al. 2009). PAMPS reacts with Fe(OH)3 to give PFAMPS,
and the action between Fe3+ and the polymer matrix is
strong. Fe3+ was not easily lost in the PAMPS matrix. In the
manuscript, PAMPS5M was chosen to react with Fe(OH)3 to
prepare PFAMPS, which was subsequently used as a catalyst
for the Biginelli reaction. As shown in Table 3, when the
amounts of PFAMPS catalyzing the reaction for 5 h were
60, 80, and 100 mg, the yields of 4a were 76, 85, and 87%,
respectively. As the amount of PFAMPS increased, the yield
of 4a increased.
The infuence of catalysts on the yield of 4a
The infuence of catalysts containing sulfonic groups on
the yield of 4a was examined. As shown in Table 2, the
Biginelli reaction of benzaldehyde (1a), ethyl acetoacetate,
and urea without catalyst yielded 4a less than 5%. The H+
densities of PAMPS5M, p-TsOH·H2O, sulfamic acid, LSA,
CSA, SSA, and ACER were 4.51, 5.26, 10.30, 2.20, 5.17,
4.39, and 0.82 mmol/g, respectively. They were each used as
catalysts to synthesize 4a. To compare the catalytic efects
of diferent catalysts, appropriate amounts of each catalyst
were added to give the same H+ contents. The yields of 4a
catalyzed by PAMPS5M, p-TsOH·H2O, sulfamic acid, LSA,
CSA, SSA, and ACER were 95, 93, 91, 80, 90, 87, and 83%,
respectively. As shown, the catalytic efect of PAMPS5M
was the best. The experiments also showed that p-TsOH·H2O
and sulfamic acid cannot be recycled as catalysts. ACER is a
traditional catalyst widely used in industry, and the amount
of ACER is 5.5 times that of PAMPS5M. The yield of 4a
catalyzed by ACER is lower than that of 4a catalyzed by
PAMPS5M.
For comparison, other sulfonic acid-type polymers,
such as LSA, CSA, SSA, and ACER, were reacted with
Table 2 Efects of various sulfonic acid-type catalysts on 4a
Entry Catalyst
H+ density
of catalyst/
mmol·g−1
Amount of Reac-
Yield/%
catalyst/
mg
tion
Table 3 Optimization of reaction conditions
time /h
Entry
Catalyst
Amount of
catalyst/mg
Reaction Yield of 4a/%
time/h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Catalyst free
PAMPS5M 4.51
PAMPS10M 4.01
PAMPS15M 3.97
PAMPS20M 3.86
PAMSP25M 3.62
p-TsOH·H2O 5.26
–
0
100
100
100
100
100
85
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
<5
95
90
88
83
83
93
91
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PAMPS5M
PAMPS5M
PAMPS5M
PAMPS5M
PAMPS5M
PAMPS5M
PFAMPS
PFAMPS
PFAMPS
PFAMPS
PFAMPS
100
80
60
100
100
100
100
80
5
5
5
4
3
2
5
5
5
4
3
95
89
80
94
90
81
87
85
76
86
73
Sulfamic
10.30
45
acid
9
LSA
CSA
SSA
2.20
5.17
4.39
0.82
240
100
100
550
5
5
5
5
80
90
87
83
9
10
11
60
80
80
10
11
12
ACER
1 3