Reaction Kinetics in Ionic Liquids
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 106, No. 13, 2002 3147
References and Notes
Summary and Conclusions
(1) Welton, T. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2071, and references therein.
Brennecke, J. F.; Maginn, E. J. AIChE J. 2001, 47, 2384.
(2) Behar, D.; Gonzalez, C.; Neta, P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105,.
(3) The mention of commercial equipment or material does not imply
recognition or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and
Technology, nor does it imply that the material or equipment identified are
necessarily the best available for the purpose.
(4) Grodkowski, J.; Neta, P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 4475.
(5) Schuler, R. H.; Patterson, L. K.; Janata, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1980,
84, 2088.
Pulse radiolysis of ionic liquids (BMIPF6, BMIBF4, BuPicPF6,
BuPyBF4, and R4NNTf2) permits production of a variety of
radicals and measurement of absolute rate constants for reduc-
tion and oxidation of various molecules. The experimental rate
constants for oxidation of ClPz and Trolox by CCl3O2• radicals
in the ionic liquids (Table 4) are much lower than rate constants
for the same reactions in aqueous solutions and closer to rate
constants measured in alcohols. This comparison suggests that
the ionic liquids do not behave as highly polar solvents.
However, from comparison of the experimental rate constants
with the diffusion-controlled limits estimated from the viscosities
of the solvents, it is concluded that encounters between reactants
in ionic liquids are more fruitful than encounters in water and
much more than those in nonpolar solvents.
(6) Buxton, G. V.; Greenstock, C. L.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. J.
Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513.
(7) Radiolysis of water produces hydrated electrons along with hydroxyl
radicals and small amounts of hydrogen atoms. The alcohol serves as a
scavenger for the OH radicals and permits observation of the reaction of
the hydrated electrons with other solutes. The use of high pH is for
preventing the reaction of hydrated electrons with protons that are also
formed in the radiolysis.
(8) Bobrowski, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 3524.
Solvated electrons that are radiolytically produced in R4NNTf2
do not react rapidly with the solvent and can react with solutes.
Thus it was possible to reduce benzophenone to its ketyl radical
and to determine the rate constant for electron transfer from
this radical to duroquinone. Although the experimental rate
constant is relatively low, it is close to the diffusion-controlled
limit in this solvent. The rate constants for the same reaction in
water and in glycerol are also close to the respective diffusion-
controlled limits, but the value is much lower in 2-PrOH. In
contrast with R4NNTf2, solvated electrons produced in imida-
zolium or pyridinium ionic liquids are rapidly scavenged by
the solvent cations. In the case of BMI+ the electrons are
completely trapped, as discussed before,2 but with BuPy+ and
BuPic+ it is possible to follow the electron transfer from the
solvent radicals to various solutes. Surprisingly, several such
reductions occur with rate constant that are significantly higher
than the diffusion-controlled limit, unlike the rate constants for
the same reactions in water and 2-PrOH, which are slower than
the diffusion-controlled limit. This very fast reaction is inter-
preted as an electron hopping mechanism, whereby the electron
reaches its final destination via intervening pyridinium groups
without requiring the diffusion of a specific radical to approach
a reactant molecule.
(9) (CF3SO2)2NH is a strong acid, with pKa ) 1.7 (Foropoulos, J., Jr.;
DesMarteau, D. D. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 33, 3720).
(10) By comparison with the behavior of the succinimidyl radical: Lind,
J.; Jonsson, M.; Eriksen, T. E.; Merenyi, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 1610.
Lind, J.; Jonsson, M.; Shen, X.; Eriksen, T. E.; Merenyi, G.; Eberson, L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3503.
(11) Rao, P. S.; Hayon, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 2274.
(12) Neta, P.; Grodkowski, J.; Ross, A. B. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
1996, 25, 709.
(13) Veltwisch, D.; Asmus, K.-D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1982,
1147.
(14) Adams, G. E.; Willson, R. L. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1
1973, 69, 719.
(15) Hayon, E.; Ibata, T.; Lichtin, N. N.; Simic, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1972,
76, 2072.
(16) Espenson, J. H. Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Mechanisms, 2nd
ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1995; pp 201-202.
(17) Watanabe, T.; Honda, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 2617.
(18) Neta, P.; Simic, M. G.; Hoffman, M. Z. J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 80,
2018.
(19) In the aqueous TEOA solutions, when the concentration of p-NAP
was reduced below 0.3 mmol L-1, the kinetic traces indicated two formation
steps. The slower step became more pronounced as the concentration of
p-NAP was decreased and its rate constant was estimated to be ∼4 × 108
L mol-1 s-1. We interpret this observation by considering that two radicals
can be formed from TEOA, (HOCH2CH2)2NC˙ HCH2OH and (HOCH2CH2)2-
NCH2C˙ HOH, both reducing p-NAP with very similar rate constants, but
the second radical can undergo base-catalyzed elimination of (HOCH2CH2)2-
•
NH to yield CH2CHO (Gilbert, B. C.; Larkin, J. P.; Norman, R. O. C. J.
Ionic liquids also affect the reduction potentials of certain
couples, e.g., by preferential solvation of the reduced or oxidized
species as compared with the solvation of these species in other
solvents. It has been demonstrated that the equilibrium between
the MV2+/MV•+ couple and the AQS-/AQS•2- couple reverses
direction upon going from water to 2-PrOH.23 We confirm these
findings and show that the equilibrium between the MV2+/MV•+
couple and the DQ/DQ•- couple also reverses direction upon
going from water to 2-PrOH. In all cases the electron transfer
rate constants are fairly high. On the other hand, these electron
transfer reactions are much slower in BuPyBF4 and the direction
of the equilibrium is the same as in 2-PrOH and opposite that
in water. The slowness of the electron transfer is partly due to
the high viscosity and partly due to a lower driving force for
the reaction, leading to a very large solvent effect on the rate
constant. The change in driving force, i.e., the shift in equilib-
rium 16 and 17, appears to be due to enhanced solubility of
species with fewer negative or positive charges. This may be
taken as another indication that this ionic liquid is highly
associated, thus solubilizing neutral species better than ionic
species. The effect of the microenvironement on the reduction
potentials of the reactants is demonstrated by the finding that
addition of small amounts of water to the ionic liquid has a
very large effect on the electron transfer rate constant.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1972, 794. Steenken, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1979,
83, 595) while the first radical cannot do so. As the concentration of p-NAP
is decreased the rate of reduction is accordingly decreased, permitting a
more substantial fraction of the second radicals to undergo elimination. This
results in a decrease in the contribution of the fast step and an increase in
the contribution of the slow step. Since •CH2CHO is not a reducing radical,
the slow step probably involves reaction with p-NAP via addition, as do
various other radicals (Jagannadham, V.; Steenken, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 6542; 1988, 110, 2188).
(20) Ledwith, A. In Biochemical Mechanisms of Paraquat Toxicity;
Autor, A. P., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1977; p 21.
(21) Wardman, P.; Clarke, E. D. Br. J. Cancer 1987, 5, Suppl. 8, 172.
(22) Wardman, P. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1989, 18, 1637.
(23) Pal, H.; Mukherjee, T. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1993, 70, 409.
(24) Calculated from thiocyanate dosimetry by correcting for the
difference in electron density of the solutions and assuming that the molar
absorption of TMPD•+ is 1.2 × 104 L mol-1 cm-1, similar to that determined
in CCl4 solutions by Burrows, H. D.; Greatorex, D.; Kemp, T. J. J. Phys.
Chem. 1972, 76, 20.
(25) Calculated by assuming that the molar absorption coefficient of
ClPz•+ in MtBANTf2 is similar to that in water (1.07 × 104 L mol-1 cm-1):
Pelizzetti, E.; Meisel, D.; Mulac, W. A.; Neta, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,
101, 6954.
(26) Neta, P.; Huie, R. E.; Mosseri, S.; Shastri, L. V.; Mittal, J. P.;
Maruthamuthu, P.; Steenken, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 4099.
(27) Alfassi, Z. B.; Huie, R. E.; Kumar, M.; Neta, P. J. Phys. Chem.
1992, 96, 767.
(28) Alfassi, Z. B.; Huie, R. E.; Neta, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 7253.
(29) Neta, P.; Huie, R. E.; Maruthamuthu, P.; Steenken, S. J. Phys.
Chem. 1989, 93, 7654.