Self-Assembly of Core−Shell Organosilicon Microcapsules
A R T I C L E S
of their preparation. Due to the small dimensions involved,
microfluidic fluid dynamics are predominantly characterized by
laminar flow, leading to unique fluid morphologies21-23 and the
production of monodisperse emulsions.24,25 To create micro-
particles, the emulsions are subsequently captured through
polymerization or coascervation. For example, flow-through
channel arrays have been used to create monodisperse micro-
emulsions26,27 that were subsequently polymerized via UV
initiation to form solid microspheres.28 Straightforward geom-
etries such as T-intersections have yielded monodisperse single
and double emulsions29 that have been polymerized to form solid
acrylic microspheres and biphasic microspheres30 as well as
nonspherical plugs and disks.31 Microfluidic flow focusing
devices32 have also been used recently to create single and
double emulsions that yielded solid acrylic microspheres, disks,
and rods33,34 in addition to multicored acrylic microspheres35,36
and dye-labeled microspheres.33,34,36 The above two-dimensional
flow focusing devices have evolved into three-dimensional,
coaxial systems such as those employed to produce hollow nylon
capsules,37 hollow cured adhesive capsules,38 solid enzyme-
containing acrylic microspheres,39 and continuously produced
hollow and solid microfibers.40
Figure 1. Schematic of the microfluidic device and the formation of the
self-assembled microcapsules.
Figure 2. Light microscope images of (A) a population of microcapsules
and (B) a single capsule.
Results and Discussion
The core-shell organosilicon microcapsules were prepared
in a simple microfluidic device41 made from flexible PVC
tubing. A continuous phase of aqueous glycerol flowed through
the tube and a disperse phase of dichlorodiphenylsilane (Cl2Ph2Si)
was introduced through a small-gauge needle inserted orthogonal
to the continuous phase flow, forming a T-junction in the center
of the channel (Figure 1, Figure S1). Disposable syringes and
syringe pumps supplied the fluids, allowing independent control
of each phase. The enhanced viscosity of the glycerol solutions
(η ) 11-60 mPa‚s) provided viscous confinement of the
disperse phase. Otherwise, the Cl2Ph2Si wet and spread along
the PVC channel walls after roughly a minute of flow in a water
continuous phase, forming polydisperse microcapsules. When
glycerol or 1% methyl cellulose was employed, no channel
wetting occurred and conversion was quantitative based on mass
yield.
The morphology of the microparticles was characterized by
light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Light microscope images reveal spheroidal microparticles with
diameters of 100-600 µm (Figure 2A) with serrated edges
visible at higher magnifications (Figure 2B). Microcapsule size
is governed by the radius r of the drop that forms in the
apparatus in Figure 1. Predicting this size is difficult, but it is
reasonable to expect that it would depend on the Reynolds and
capillary numbers (Re and Ca, respectively), interfacial surface
tension (γ), needle radius (rn), the tube radius (R), and the ratios
of disperse to continuous phase viscosities (η and ηd), densities
(F and Fd), and velocities (V and Vd). Then, dimensional analysis
yields eq 1.
Though these efforts are exciting developments in micro-
particle preparation and microfluidics, all of the investigations
to date have created particles whose morphologies closely
mirrored those of the templating fluids. Here, we present the
microfluidic preparation of microparticles possessing structured
morphologies that differ from the fluids from which they were
prepared. The initially homogeneous emulsion droplets self-
assemble within minutes of the emulsification event, forming a
hollow, core-shell morphology.
(20) Xia, Y. N.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
551-575.
(21) Thorsen, T.; Roberts, R. W.; Arnold, F. H.; Quake, S. R. Phys. ReV. Lett.
2001, 86, 4163-4166.
(22) Dreyfus, R.; Tabeling, P.; Willaime, H. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2003, 90.
(23) Zheng, B.; Tice, J. D.; Ismagilov, R. F. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 4977-
4982.
(24) Garstecki, P.; Stone, H. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2005, 94.
(25) Cristini, V.; Tan, Y. C. Lab Chip 2004, 4, 257-264.
(26) Sugiura, S.; Nakajima, M.; Iwamoto, S.; Seki, M. Langmuir 2001, 17,
5562-5566.
(27) Kobayashi, I.; Mukataka, S.; Nakajima, M. Langmuir 2005, 21, 7629-
7632.
(28) Sugiura, S.; Nakajima, M.; Itou, H.; Seki, M. Macromol. Rapid Commun.
2001, 22, 773-778.
(29) Okushima, S.; Nisisako, T.; Torii, T.; Higuchi, T. Langmuir 2004, 20,
9905-9908.
(30) Nisisako, T.; Torii, T.; Higuchi, T. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 101, 23-29.
(31) Dendukuri, D.; Tsoi, K.; Hatton, T. A.; Doyle, P. S. Langmuir 2005, 21,
2113-2116.
(32) Anna, S. L.; Bontoux, N.; Stone, H. A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 364-
366.
(33) Seo, M.; Nie, Z. H.; Xu, S. Q.; Mok, M.; Lewis, P. C.; Graham, R.;
Kumacheva, E. Langmuir 2005, 21, 11614-11622.
(34) Xu, S. Q.; Nie, Z. H.; Seo, M.; Lewis, P.; Kumacheva, E.; Stone, H. A.;
Garstecki, P.; Weibel, D. B.; Gitlin, I.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 724-728.
FVR
η
ηV
γ
V η F R
Ca Vd ηd Fd rn
r ) f
,
,
,
,
,
(1)
(35) Nie, Z. H.; Xu, S. Q.; Seo, M.; Lewis, P. C.; Kumacheva, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 8058-8063.
(
(
)
(
)
)
Re
(36) Martin-Banderas, L.; Flores-Mosquera, M.; Riesco-Chueca, P.; Rodriguez-
Gil, A.; Cebolla, A.; Chavez, S.; Ganan-Calvo, A. M. Small 2005, 1, 688-
692.
Once the apparatus geometry and fluid compositions are fixed,
the drop size can vary with the Reynolds and capillary numbers
and the ratio of flow rates of continuous and disperse phase. If
the disperse phase flow rate also is fixed, then the drop size
(37) Takeuchi, S.; Garstecki, P.; Weibel, D. B.; Whitesides, G. M. AdV. Mater.
2005, 17, 1067-1072.
(38) Utada, A. S.; Lorenceau, E.; Link, D. R.; Kaplan, P. D.; Weitz, D. A. Science
2005, 308, 537-541.
(39) Jeong, W. J.; Kim, J. Y.; Choo, J.; Lee, E. K.; Han, C. S.; Beebe, D. J.;
Seong, G. H.; Lee, S. H. Langmuir 2005, 21, 3738-3741.
(40) Jeong, W.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Mensing, G.; Beebe, D. J. Lab Chip
2004, 4, 576-580.
(41) Quevedo, E.; Steinbacher, J.; McQuade, D. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 10498-10499.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 29, 2006 9443