and SmBr
three primary absorbance regions for SmBr
and 604 nm. For SmBr -HMPA, these peaks have been
2
-HMPA (50 equiv) in THF solvent. There are
2
, at 410, 548,
Table 1. SmBr -HMPA-Mediated Reactions
2
2
shifted to the shorter wavelengths 394, 526, and 582 nm.
The bands between 500 and 650 nm for Sm(II) complexes
have been ascribed to f-d transitions, although this assign-
ment is not a certainty.13 The two shortest wavelengths are
consistent in terms of relative intensities. However, the peak
2
at 604 nm for SmBr loses a significant amount of its relative
intensity upon the addition of HMPA. These shifts to shorter
wavelengths show that the Sm(II) complex is absorbing a
higher amount of energy. A reasonable conclusion is that
HMPA, being a more tightly bound ligand than THF, is
increasing the ligand field strength of the system. In transition
metals, increased ligand field strength increases the splitting
of the d-orbitals responsible for absorption.14 A similar
conclusion could be drawn here, that f-orbital splitting is
occurring to a larger extent, increasing the amount of energy
necessary for an excited state to be achieved. While 4f
orbitals are highly shielded in lanthanide elements, it has
been reported that perturbations of up to 0.1 eV (9.6 kJ
-
1
15
mol ) can occur from ligand effects. The maximum shift
of 22 nm by the SmBr absorptions upon the addition of
2
-
1
HMPA is equivalent to 4 kJ mol , well within this
established literature value. Our studies show there is clearly
a
Yields based on GC-MS analysis. b 2-Octanol found in 20% yield.
c
Isolated yields in parentheses. d General conditions: 0.25-1.0 mmol
2
a relationship between the addition of HMPA to SmBr and
the change in the energies of the ground and excited-state
orbitals, whatever the transitions may be.
substrate, 2-2.5 equiv SmBr2-HMPA (50 equiv HMPA), under nitrogen
atmosphere (See Supporting Information).
It is interesting to compare the UV-vis spectra of SmI
and SmBr and their HMPA complexes. Both SmI and
SmBr absorptions shift to shorter wavelengths upon addition
of HMPA. While SmI and SmBr complexes show absorp-
tions at 618 nm (SmI ) and 604 nm (SmBr ), these peaks
broaden significantly upon the addition of HMPA. Although
the exact species in solution for the bromide complexes
cannot be discerned from these data, careful examination of
2
2
2
reductant of choice for alkyl chloride reductions. We also
2
found that SmBr -HMPA is not useful in ester reduction.
2
2
2
All attempts to reductively couple alkyl chlorides with esters
resulted in reduction of the chloroalkane and recovery of
the ester.
2
2
Another reaction that we explored was the reduction of
ketimines. Although the reductive dimerization of aldimines
the UV-vis spectra in Figure 3 shows that both SmBr
2
and
1
6
2
has been carried out with SmI , there are few examples of
SmBr -HMPA are different than their SmI analogues. This
2
2
1
7
the reduction of ketimines. Treatment of the N-benzyl
imines of acetophenone and pinacolone with SmBr -HMPA
supports electrochemical evidence presented earlier in this
paper and clearly shows that addition of excess HMPA to
2
produced the corresponding amines in less than 15 min at
room temperature. The reduction product from the N-benzyl
imine of pinacolone was isolated in a 90% yield. We are
currently exploring the reduction of less hindered ketimines
SmBr
HMPA)
To examine the synthetic utility of SmBr
2
does not produce the octahedral complex [Sm-
2
+
(
6
] .
2
2
and SmBr -
HMPA, several reactions with functionalities that are typi-
cally difficult to reduce were performed. Table 1 lists some
with SmBr -HMPA to examine the possibility of carrying
2
out reductive coupling reactions that lead to vicinal diamines.
In conclusion, we have studied the influence of HMPA
substrates that were exposed to SmBr -HMPA, the obtained
2
products, and their respective yields. The pinacol coupling
of 2-octanone provides a 70% yield of product with the
balance of the reaction mixture being 2-octanol. More
interesting is the reduction of alkyl chlorides. Both 1-chlo-
rododecane and chlorocyclohexane are reduced quantitatively
to the corresponding alkanes in less than 2 h at room
temperature. Although chloroalkanes can be reduced by
on SmBr
a more powerful reductant in a manner analogous to SmI
the reductant is distinct from those formed between SmI
and HMPA. The combination of SmBr
2 2
. While coordination of HMPA to SmBr produces
2
,
2
2
and HMPA provides
a powerful reducing reagent capable of reducing carbon-
chlorine bonds and imines. We are currently carrying out a
SmI
2
-HMPA, the reaction requires elevated temperatures
-HMPA is the
(
16) (a) Enholm, E. J.; Forbes, D. C.; Holub, D. P. Synth. Commun. 1990,
0, 981. (b) Imamoto, T.; Nishimura, S. Chem. Lett. 1990, 1141.
17) Banik and co-workers utilized Sm metal and a catalytic amount of
and extended periods of time. Thus, SmBr
2
2
(
(
(
13) Okaue, Y.; Isobe, T. Inorg. Chem. Acta 1988, 144, 143.
14) Harris, D. C.; Bertolucci, M. D. Symmetry and Spectroscopy; Dover
iodine to reduce and reductively couple aldimines and ketimines. The
identity of the reactive intermediate has not been established. Banik, B.
K.; Zegrocka, O.; Banik, I.; Hackfeld, L.; Becker, F. F. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 6731.
Publications Inc.: New York, 1978; pp 397-398.
(15) Ortiz, J. V.; Hoffman, R. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 2095.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 15, 2001
2323