Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201708668
COMMUNICATION
[
b]
-
[15]
7
;
0 h, under illumination; = [alcohol]final ([ketone]final + [starting material]final)
redox potentials of water to hydroxyl radicals, +2.8 V,
and
1
[16]
methanol to methanol radicals, +1.2 V, respectively. Moreover,
due to the strongly reducing nature of the methanol radical (-
The regio- and enantioselectivity was essentially the same
as in previous studies. The only side reaction observed was a
minor overoxidation to the corresponding ketone as described
above.
Very pleasingly, high turnover numbers could be achieved
throughout these experiments that compare well with the
1.3 V), it can readily inject an electron into TiO , forming
2
formaldehyde and resulting in up to two conduction band
electrons per reactive photon, an effect also known as current
[
17]
doubling (Figure S32).
Hence, methanol oxidation not only
accelerated the H O2 generation rate but also prevented the
2
numbers reported so far with more complicated in situ H
2
O
2
formation of ROS from water oxidation (Figure S32 and Table
S3 for further details).
[1b]
[18]
generation systems.
Hence, we are optimistic that further
optimisation of the reaction setup may well lead to an
economically attractive oxyfunctionalisation reaction. Indeed, a
preparative scale hydroxylation reaction of ethyl benzene
yielded more than 100 mg of essentially enantiopure product
Overall, this study demonstrates the application of methanol
as sacrificial reductant for in situ H O2 generation from O2 to
2
promote selective, peroxygenase-catalysed oxyfunctionalisation
reactions. Admittedly, the productivities reported here do not
reach preparatively useful values yet. Also the very high
turnover numbers for rAaeUPO reported previously have not
been reached yet. Future efforts will therefore focus on
optimizing the light penetration into the reaction medium and
(
75% conversion, 51% isolated yield). Further optimisation is
currently underway.
increasing the
photochemical flow-chemistry setups
internal illumination.
H
2
O
2
generation rate, e.g. by using
[
19]
or wirelessly powered
[
20]
Acknowledgements
F.H and W.Z. gratefully acknowledge financial support by the
European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant No.
648026). B.O.B. and J.Z.B are grateful for financial support from
Figure 2. Qualitative and quantitative determination of radicals occurring
the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant no. BL 1425/1-1).
The authors thank Ben Norder (Delft University of Technology)
for XRD, Dr. Wiel H. Evers (Delft University of Technology) for
TEM and Prof. Fred Hagen (Delft University of Technology) for
EPR measurements.
during the photocatalytic process. (A) EPR spectra recorded during the
illumination of and rutile Au-TiO
2
in water with methanol for 20 min. Signals
marked with asterisk () belong to the existing oxidation product of DMPO,
[
12]
5
,5-dimethyl-2-oxopyrroline-1-oxyl (DMPOX). Signals marked with triangles
() belong to the spin-adduct •DMPO-OH. Signals marked with circles ()
[
13]
belong to the spin-adduct •DMPO-CH
2
OH from methanol.
Reaction
-
1
condition: [Au-TiO
2
] = 5 g L , [DMPO] = 30 mM, [methanol]= 100 mM, RT,
Keywords: Biocatalysis • Photocatalysis • Oxyfunctionalisation •
under illumination; (B) Time course of the photocatalytic umbelliferone
TiO • Peroxygenase
2
generation from coumarin as a specific detection method for •OH radicals.
-
1
Reaction conditions: 60 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7), [Au-TiO
2
] = 5 g L ,
o
[1]
a) Y. Wang, D. Lan, R. Durrani, F. Hollmann, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2017, 37, 1-9; b) S. Bormann, A. Gomez Baraibar, Y. Ni, D. Holtmann,
F. Hollmann, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2038-2052.
[
coumarin] = 0.1 mM, [methanol]= 0 () or 250 mM (), T = 30 C, under
illumination.
[
[
2]
3]
M. Hofrichter, R. Ullrich, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 19, 116-125.
Y. Ni, E. Fernández-Fueyo, A. G. Baraibar, R. Ullrich, M. Hofrichter, H.
Yanase, M. Alcalde, W. J. H. van Berkel, F. Hollmann, Angew. Chem.
As mentioned above, methanol not only accelerated the
overall reaction but also contributed to its robustness (Figures S
2
016, 128, 809–812, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 798–801.
[
4]
a) G. H. Moon, W. Kim, A. D. Bokare, N. E. Sung, W. Choi, Energ.
Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 4023-4028; b) M. Teranishi, R. Hoshino, S.-I.
Naya, H. Tada, Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 12965–12969, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 12773-12777.
29, 31). In the absence of methanol rAaeUPO lost its catalytic
activity almost instantaneously under illumination whereas in the
presence of methanol the enzyme activity was retained for
several hours (Figure S 31). We suspected reactive oxygen
species formed by the photocatalysts to account for this, which
was qualitatively confirmed with EPR spectroscopy (Figure
[
[
5]
6]
J. B. Priebe, J. Radnik, A. J. J. Lennox, M. M. Pohl, M. Karnahl, D.
Hollmann, K. Grabow, U. Bentrup, H. Junge, M. Beller, A. Bruckner,
ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2137-2148.
P. Molina-Espeja, S. Ma, D. M. Mate, R. Ludwig, M. Alcalde, Enz.
Microb. Technol. 2015, 73–74, 29-33.
[
13]
[14]
2A).
More quantitatively, the coumarin method showed that
hydroxyl radicals were formed in significant amounts only in the
absence of methanol (Figure 2B). Upon addition of methanol
[
[
7]
8]
X. Z. Li, C. C. Chen, J. C. Zhao, Langmuir 2001, 17, 4118-4122.
C. G. Hatchard, C. A. Parker, Proc. Royal Soc. London Ser. A-Math
Phys. Sci. 1956, 235, 518-536.
(
250 mM) the hydroxyl radical formation rate dropped to only
0
.6% of the original value.
Apparently, methanol oxidation occurs significantly faster
[9]
C. Kormann, D. W. Bahnemann, M. R. Hoffmann, Environ. Sci. Technol.
1988, 22, 798-806.
than water oxidation, which is comprehensible considering the
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.